myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike Kienenberger (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-416) Installing Tomahawk breaks jsf-ri commandLink and Button components
Date Tue, 16 May 2006 19:58:08 GMT
    [ ] 

Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-416:

Looks like this also breaks MyFaces Core (without tomahawk) too:

On 5/10/06, Jonathan Harley <> wrote:
> Hi, I've been trying out MyFaces 1.1.3 after previously using 1.1.1.
> Everything went fine except that all my h:commandLinks stopped
> working, because they were generating onClick javascript which
> called clear_linkDummyForm, but the javascript method itself was
> not being generated.
> After a bit of a search on the JIRA, I tried adding in the
> Tomahawk ExtensionsFilter (from Tomahawk 1.1.2), and lo,
> clear_linkDummyForm() is added to pages which have the
> ExtensionsFilter mapped and not to pages which don't.
> Is it really the case that the ExtensionsFilter is now mandatory
> to make basic (non-extension) JSF features work, or am I missing
> some new bit of config?
> I assume it must be the latter, because if ExtensionsFilter was
> mandatory, why not just roll its functionality into the core MyFaces
> servlet?

> Installing Tomahawk breaks jsf-ri commandLink and Button components
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>          Key: TOMAHAWK-416
>          URL:
>      Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Extended CommandLink/CommandButton, NavigationMenuItem
>     Versions: 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT
>     Reporter: Mike Youngstrom
>     Priority: Blocker

> It appears that the extended Link and Button renderers added to the tomahawk faces-config
break JSF-RI's ability to correctly render Links and buttons.  This is a serious issue.  Coming
up soon will be the first solo tomahawk release which is supposed to help show tomahawk's
independence from myfaces core.  Yet this release will be completely unusable on the only
other major jsf implementation out there.  Let me know if there is something the RI can do
to help fix this problem.
> Mike

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message