Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63456 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2006 06:58:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2006 06:58:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 79004 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2006 06:58:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 78962 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2006 06:58:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 78951 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2006 06:58:13 -0000 Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of mario@ops.co.at designates 194.152.182.4 as permitted sender) Received: from [194.152.182.4] (HELO smtp.ops.co.at) (194.152.182.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 23:58:13 -0700 Received: by smtp.ops.co.at (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7480F23C0E1; Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:54:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.27.1.102] (lints1.int.ops.co.at [172.27.1.102]) by smtp.ops.co.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D1223C0D7 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:54:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4434BB2E.2010609@ops.co.at> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:54:38 +0200 From: Mario Ivankovits User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: RESTful JSF References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on smtp.ops.co.at X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-24.8 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, LOCAL_WHITE_RECV_TS1,LOC_SPMSIG_2,RATWR10_MESSID,SMILEY autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi! > Forgive me if this has already been brought up, but what about URIs > 255 chars? This is why I proposed to route the real link generation through some sort of interface. That way we can provide a service like TinyURL - so the url size is no longer a problem here. Since even a long url requires relatively less memory you can store them for decades ;-) > What does the servlet spec say about URI size limits? > Its more "what do the http spec say" about URI size limits - and how long might it take to have browsers with higher limits spread out. Ciao, Mario