myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stan Silvert" <stan.silv...@jboss.com>
Subject RE: [PROPOSAL] Future Releases
Date Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:37:18 GMT
> Aren`t you JBoss` JSR 252 / 127 man ?

Yes, I am the JBoss rep for JSR-252.  We didn't participate in JSR-127.
We were a VERY small company back then.  So, I don't believe I have any
access to the JSF 1.1 TCK.

Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
ssilvert@jboss.com
callto://stansilvert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mwessendorf@gmail.com [mailto:mwessendorf@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of
> Matthias Wessendorf
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 8:51 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Future Releases
> 
> > Please let me know what I need to sign and where to send it.  I'd
like
> > to get involved with the TCK testing.
> 
> 
> Aren`t you JBoss` JSR 252 / 127 man ?
> 
> 
> > Stan Silvert
> > JBoss, Inc.
> > ssilvert@jboss.com
> > callto://stansilvert
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 6:50 PM
> > > To: MyFaces Development
> > > Subject: [PROPOSAL] Future Releases
> > >
> > > Here are four proposals to help us get future releases out ASAP.
> > >
> > > 1.) Branch tomahawk now (even before the core vote is finalized.)
> > > This will allow testing and a quick followup release since this
> > > one-time upgrade of core will require a new tomahawk.  We release
with
> > > anything but a major show stopper.
> > >
> > > 2.) Branch core (again) immediately following the release of
1.1.2.
> > > The branch is several weeks old and there may already be TCK
problems
> > > in the trunk or other issues that nobody has discovered.  Since
we'd
> > > like to do more frequent releases, lets start this process earlier
> > > rather then later.
> > >
> > > 3.) Comprehensive wiki on the release procedure starting with the
core
> > > release.  There have been so many changes and problems that I have
> > > given up on documentation this go round.  But we should have
better
> > > documentation so that people other then myself can do the release.
> > >
> > > 4.) More TCK testers.  Get more of the committers to sign the NDA,
and
> > > more importantly, get their machines to be able to run the TCK.
The
> > > more TCK testers we have out there the faster we can fix these
> > > problems.
> > >
> > > Sean
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> Aechterhoek 18
> 48282 Emsdetten
> http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Mime
View raw message