myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Schofield" <sean.schofi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Portlet/Tomahawk bugs [was RE: JSF 1.2: branch, wiki, maven repo, ...]
Date Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:09:36 GMT
So we're talking a new JIRA category and *not* a new maven artifact
right? If so then +1.

Sean

On 4/24/06, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Stan,
>
> Are you willing to cycle through each of the portlet issues and
> reclassify each one?  (either as a core portlets component bug or move
> it to a tomahawk bug (either portlet component or whatever else is
> relevent?)
>
> The query I used was
>
> Project: MyFaces Core
>
> Issue Type: Bug
>
> Components:  No Component, General, JSR-127
>
> Resolutions:  Unresolved
>
> (basically I pulled up the MYFaces-core tracker, selected
> "outstanding" issues, and narrowed down the issue type and components
> involved.)
>
> At some point I should look through the other 42 issues and see why
> they're not bugs.  I suspect most of the remaining stuff is
> misclassified.
>
> If you want, I will add JIRA portlet components for Core or Tomahawk.
> Just let me know.
>
>
> On 4/24/06, Stan Silvert <stan.silvert@jboss.com> wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 11:37 AM
> > > To: MyFaces Development
> > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2: branch, wiki, maven repo, ...
> > >
> > > On 4/24/06, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > It looks like we have 75 unresolved bugs filed against core, but
> > those
> > > > with a vested interest in having them fixed will eventually submit
> > > > patches.
> > >
> > > I've knocked this down to 65 bugs after moving issue to Tomahawk and
> > > reclassification.
> > > I noticed there were a number of portlet issues in there.  Should we
> > > consider these separate?  Perhaps create a portlet component for core?
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I think that's a pretty good idea.  Portlet bugs don't affect TCK and
> > they should only hold up a release if they are really severe.
> >
> > Most of these are there because of integration problems between
> > "standard" JSF Portlets and Tomahawk.  Now that Tomahawk is its own
> > project it is more unclear which project should be responsible for the
> > fix.  It may be that we need a TomahawkMyFacesPortlet that adds the
> > extra stuff needed to support these components.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I'll have to keep these issues on the back burner for
> > awhile longer - at least until JSF 1.2 is done.  If any other committer
> > wants to take them over, be my guest.
> >
> > Stan Silvert
> > JBoss, Inc.
> > ssilvert@jboss.com
> > callto://stansilvert
> >
>

Mime
View raw message