Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10163 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2006 19:23:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2006 19:23:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 26264 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2006 19:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 25906 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2006 19:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 25895 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2006 19:24:28 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:24:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mario@ops.co.at designates 194.152.182.4 as permitted sender) Received: from [194.152.182.4] (HELO smtp.ops.co.at) (194.152.182.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:24:27 -0800 Received: by smtp.ops.co.at (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 068D723C48A; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:24:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.3.1] (mgate.int.ops.co.at [172.27.0.11]) by smtp.ops.co.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C57D23C0D7 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:24:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <440C8C52.5080000@ops.co.at> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 20:24:02 +0100 From: Mario Ivankovits User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: Testing Progress? References: <2387fbc50603061049n3cf47968ybc45f433bfde47f5@mail.gmail.com> <440C87F6.6030703@ops.co.at> <2387fbc50603061109g3128571dqb433508dc5ab6de1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2387fbc50603061109g3128571dqb433508dc5ab6de1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on smtp.ops.co.at X-Spam-Level: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, hits=-61.2 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, LOCAL_SPAMSIGN_2,RATWR10_MESSID,SMILEY,SPG_mg_genit2, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi! > Is the ExtensionFilter bug something that already exists in the > current 1.1.1 release? IMHO no. This bug were introduced during the creation of AddResourceFactory which was 2006-02-08. So after the 1.1.1 release. > If its not a new bug then I don't mind > releasing with the bug in place. Also, if the bug only affects > tomahawk then it doesn't matter at this point. This bug affects the whole system as soon as you start using the filter which is a requirement for myfaces. Its a REALLY nasty bug as the filter will deliver the response not to the requestee. Its possible to get the output of another user instead of the one you requested. > (Sorry for not taking > the time to read my old email but I am trying to help you guys out > with the release before I leave the country.) > :-) Thank you! >> BTW: How do you plan to tag shared? We need separate tags for >> shared_tomahawk and shared_imp, no? >> > > No, those are artifacts of maven. There is only one copy of the > shared source code and it will be branched and tagged according to the > version (2.0.0) > So if you release tomahawk at any time later you have to increase the version? But even then, the shared_impl-2.0.1 might not be compatible to shared_impl-2.0.0 if you tagged shared to release tomahawk. --- Mario