Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-11843-apmail-myfaces-dev-archive=myfaces.apache.org@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83155 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2006 10:56:52 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2006 10:56:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 46033 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2006 10:57:38 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 45984 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2006 10:57:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.myfaces.apache.org>
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 45970 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2006 10:57:38 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:57:38 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [212.6.122.28] (HELO mail4.ewetel.de) (212.6.122.28)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:57:37 -0800
Received: from gateway.privat (dyndsl-085-016-003-101.ewe-ip-backbone.de
 [85.16.3.101])
	by mail4.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k21AvEfR026480
	for <dev@myfaces.apache.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:57:15 +0100 (MET)
Received: from debian.privat ([192.168.1.1])
	by gateway.privat with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1FEP0y-0004Eh-58
	for dev@myfaces.apache.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:57:04 +0100
Message-ID: <44057DFF.2000502@weber-oldenburg.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:57:03 +0100
From: Volker Weber <users.myfaces@weber-oldenburg.de>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: ExtensionFilter: get rid of its buffering
References: <44057B87.5020809@ops.co.at>
In-Reply-To: <44057B87.5020809@ops.co.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Weber-Oldenburg-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-CheckCompat: OK
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hi,

i'm not sure and have not tested, but AFAIK the
<link rel="stylesheet" ..> tags don't work outside html-head.

Regards,
  Volker


Mario Ivankovits wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Currently I try to get rid of the buffering of the extension filter. (No
> code yet, just many many thoughts about it)
> 
> First of all: Who says we have to render the <script src= stuff in
> html-head?
> 
> I tried a short XHTML and checked it on http://validator.w3.org/check -
> it didnt complain about it.
> A short look in
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/xhtml11_dtd.html#a_xhtml11_dtd shows
> 
> <!-- These elements are neither block nor inline, and can
>      essentially be used anywhere in the document body.
> -->
> <!ENTITY % Misc.class
>      "%Edit.class;
>       %Script.class;
>       %Misc.extra;"
> 
> 
> so this makes me thinking we can get rid of it without any troubles.
> 
> So why cant we just render the script in place and are fine with it.
> 
> Just the JsValueChangeListener is an exception which know a
> "bodyTagEvent" attribute. But I think we can get rid of it and handle
> this through the new to come documentBody tag.
> 
> There are also other ideas, but I will discuss them after I know why we
> can NOT get rid of the script tag in html-head ;-)
> 
> Ciao,
> Mario
> 

-- 
Don't answer to From: address!
Mail to this account are droped if not recieved via mailinglist.
To contact me direct create the mail address by
concatenating my forename to my senders domain.