Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of martin.marinschek@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.200 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=NAHA1a5vaCciTKNpI4ctfRnOaPUJW8y7L1c896wiNH7RpMoVJ0QBQzNR4iqWrIYSOwOwGTL6U7Wb/BZoXrPm/2qHD3AERGG5nezNMhdIJHM8/Ym4gOaJkvCm3ACNBlQAJkupPvfLdPyMFfJNr9E2GjM3wHqqXVzmAmcnFdENkew=
Message-ID: <5a99335f0602101142y5e521c94l86b44164931415b8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:42:07 +0100
From: Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com>
Reply-To: martin@marinschek.com
To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Next release: Core or Tomahawk?
In-Reply-To: <1a681ff20602101119i1242cfa1i93e99801f533f89d@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <2387fbc50602091225k2e8fc606je61848b7c4ce6406@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8f985b960602091236n336bf43cw3deb23ca4e5cfc9c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5a99335f0602091243i611de324v9a14bf347faeb79f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1a681ff20602100804r7796739ci@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2387fbc50602101110p2a93fd7au84bdc974632e657a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1a681ff20602101119i1242cfa1i93e99801f533f89d@mail.gmail.com>

+1 again ;)

regards,

Martin

On 2/10/06, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 ok for me
>
> On 2/10/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So you are ok with what is the commons branch at this moment?
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 2/10/06, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > There should be no problem, but I have only tested with myfaces only
> > > (not with the ri+tomahawk, shale and other stuff). The
> > > extensionsFilter should be stable now.
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > > 2006/2/9, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > I'd like to ask Bruno about the changes he made today to the source=
s -
> > > > is that in - out will that cause problems?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 2/9/06, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I also think core makes the most sense.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 for core
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/9/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I'm thinking we should release core first.  This will allow all=
 of the
> > > > > > users (and other ASF projects like Shale) that use MyFaces to t=
ake
> > > > > > advantage of the new M2 stuff we are publishing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Either way we will create a branch - actually maven will create=
 it ;-)
> > > > > >  Then we can have a more deliberate discussion before releasing=
.  We
> > > > > > can figure out which bugs to fix before rolling out, etc.  Also=
 for
> > > > > > core we will need to subject the release to the TCK.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sean
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces