myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk
Date Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:38:31 GMT
he he.

he was faster than I ;)
I planed to blog the *sandbox demo* (screens and code)
I modified it on my own to have a backing bean behind the formular.
Really works nice!

On 2/12/06, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on blogging on myfaces and dojo ;)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 2/11/06, Werner Punz <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:
> > Btw. just to add something to this discussion, Alex Russel the core
> > maintainer of Dojo asked me for permission to blog that we now use Dojo
> > in Myfaces.
> > If no one objects I would like to give him the permission
> > so that he can spread the news a little bit ;-)
> > As it is very likely that we wont pull the plug on Dojo.
> >
> >
> > Werner
> >
> >
> >
> > Bruno Aranda schrieb:
> > > Ok, sounds sensible. Let's wait for the next release then, so we have
> > > the time to test all this thoroughtly,
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > > On 2/11/06, Werner Punz <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:
> > >> Hi Bruno, as we talked things over already over gtalk.
> > >>
> > >> I think we should wait a few more weeks, and should
> > >> make a push for MyFaces 1.1.3.
> > >>
> > >> The reason, there is a foundation there, but we do not have any real
> > >> components yet (which I would love to showcase)
> > >>
> > >> (except for the one development component
> > >> which can trigger the dojo system)
> > >>
> > >> If the others have no objection I would rather have those interfaces
> > >> stabilized while we work on 1-2 actual components
> > >> (Bruno does currently, so do I and also Laurie Harper who contacted me
a
> > >> while ago) so that we see if this foundation
> > >> can hold in actual usage.
> > >>
> > >> As for the interfaces please use them and do not try to trigger Dojo
> > >> directly. The main reason for this is, that some big companies as it
> > >> seems move towards dojo as well, so we might have do do an adjustment of
> > >> how to initialize all that stuff in future releases (maybe weblets or
> > >> something else) to avoide double imports currently I only root into our
> > >> own resource loader and let dojo handle the rest.
> > >>
> > >> If you need an extension please extend those interfaces and do not hack
> > >> your own stuff.
> > >>
> > >> So -1 for pushing it into tomahawk yet, simply due to the fact that I
> > >> want to have everything seen in a real useage and want to know if I have
> > >> to do some adjustments on the foundation I laid.
> > >> But feel free to hack away in the sandbox, and we will opt a move
> > >> towards tomahawk for 1.1.3.
> > >>
> > >> Werner
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Bruno Aranda schrieb:
> > >>> Hi devs,
> > >>>
> > >>> I want to promote the dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk as I need
> > >>> this on a project I am working on. Do we have to vote on this? As it
> > >>> is not a component strictly speaking... BTW, Werner, do you think that
> > >>> the dojo code is stable enough to move it to tomahawk?
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Bruno
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>


--
Matthias Wessendorf
Zülpicher Wall 12, 239
50674 Köln
http://www.wessendorf.net
mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Mime
View raw message