myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manfred Geiler <manfred.gei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Scope provided of myfaces-impl and myfaces-api in tomahawk and sandbox?
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:16:03 GMT
Ok, now I understand.

-1 for having compile dependency to core (api, impl) in tomahawk
+1 for "provided" scope

Manfred


On 2/15/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> No.  Bernd wants the myfaces core dependencies to be included in his
> tomahawk projects automatically when he declares a tomahawk
> dependency.
>
> FWIW we will probably all want this in our personal projects since we
> use the MyFaces implementation.  But for other users this is not the
> case.  So I say make the user specify the core dependencies explicity.
>
> Sean
>
> On 2/15/06, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What about the <optional> attribute in the dependency. Would that
> > solve the problem?
> >
> > Manfred
> >
> >
> > On 2/15/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Why has myfaces-impl and myfaces-api the scope provided?
> > > >
> > > > Is the myfaces-impl and myfaces-api installed on the container?
> > > >
> > > > The normal user would expect a compile dependency to the myfaces-libs.
> > > > If I like to use the RI instead, I have to exclude the dependency in my
> > > > project and add a dependency to the RI.
> > >
> > > Hmmm.  I wasn't aware that was an option.
> > >
> > > > Now I have to declare a dependency to myfaces or the RI im my tomahawk
> > > > or sandbox project everytime.
> > >
> > > Many of our tomahawk users use the RI so I don't see the big deal.
> > >
> > > > Can we switch back to the compile dependency, please.
> > >
> > > Lets see what the others think before we decide.  Now that I know
> > > there is an option to exclude the dependency I am more open to your
> > > request.  I still think its weird to automatically include the myfaces
> > > core when you declare the tomahawk dependency.
> > >
> > > The user has the option and 50% of our users will probably be using
> > > another implementation.  So it seems more appropriate to have a
> > > provided scope.
> > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Bernd
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dipl.-Ing. Bernd Bohmann - Atanion GmbH - Software Development
> > > > Bismarckstr. 13, 26122 Oldenburg, http://www.atanion.com
> > > > phone: +49 441 4082312, mobile: +49 173 8839471, fax: +49 441 4082333
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message