myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Schofield <sean.schofi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk
Date Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:52:35 GMT
So are we basically redistributing the javascript stuff from Dojo?

Sean

On 2/11/06, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> You are absolutely right.
>
> In any case, we don't talk about pushing in an AJAX component, but the
> dojo-framework - which is a well known and respected framework and
> shouldn't represent a problem in tomahawk. We don't want to use it's
> AJAX functionality in tomahawk, but the event-listener stuff.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 2/11/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > By the way,
> >
> > Given how much the ajax-related stuff changes it might be better to
> > not push this stuff into the trunk until we're absolutely sure that's
> > how we want it.  In general I don't think needing something on a
> > project at work is a sufficient reason to put something into tomahawk.
> >  You can always use the sandbox.jar in production just as easily as
> > you can tomahawk.jar.
> >
> > In this case I haven't had time to review things so I will trust the
> > judgement of others but as we become a more high profile ASF project I
> > think we should keep in mind that once we put stuff out there people
> > will rely on it and will not be happy if interfaces break or things
> > are removed.
> >
> > As Ted once pointed out to me, the project's main responsibility is to
> > serve the people who actually do the work (people like Bruno.)  People
> > who just use our stuff and like to complain are a secondary concern.
> > Still, we should try and keep as many people happy as we can.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 2/10/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > If its not a component then I guess that's ok.  Can you add some docs
> > > to the website on how to us it etc?
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > On 2/10/06, Grant Smith <work.grant@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1 absolutely
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2/10/06, Matthias Wessendorf <mwessendorf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > doing these things. But I do think that we should go with dojo
for new
> > > > > > stuff...
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 on using dojo! I played with the stuff, after Werner added it
to
> > > > Sandbox.
> > > > > Really neat stuff!
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2/10/06, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I want to promote the dojo stuff from sandbox to tomahawk
as I need
> > > > > > > this on a project I am working on. Do we have to vote on
this? As it
> > > > > > > is not a component strictly speaking... BTW, Werner, do
you think that
> > > > > > > the dojo code is stable enough to move it to tomahawk?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > Zülpicher Wall 12, 239
> > > > > 50674 Köln
> > > > > http://www.wessendorf.net
> > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Grant Smith
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>

Mime
View raw message