myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r350265 - /myfaces/api/trunk/src/java/javax/faces/component/UIComponent.java
Date Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:12:45 GMT
I removed it as soon as I realized there was still a lack of clarity
on this issue.
However, (and I'm not a lawyer), the CDDL looks compatible with the
Apache license to me.

On 12/2/05, Abrams, Howard A <Howard.Abrams@ca.com> wrote:
> A while back someone asked if ASF was reviewing CDDL to allow including
> part of glassfish into a future MyFaces JSF1.2 implementation. Did a
> review ever happen?
>
> My understanding is JSF1.2 (and the rest of glassfish) is CDDL licensed,
> and that CDDL is _NOT_ compatible with the Apache license. Someone from
> Apache legal needs to review this issue, and in the meantime we need to
> remove anything that comes from the JEE5 RI.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Kitching [mailto:skitching@obsidium.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:14 PM
> > To: MyFaces Development
> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r350265 -
> /myfaces/api/trunk/src/java/javax/faces/component/UIComponent.java
> >
> > mkienenb@apache.org wrote:
> > > Author: mkienenb
> > > Date: Thu Dec  1 07:59:09 2005
> > > New Revision: 350265
> > >
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=350265&view=rev
> > > Log:
> > > Copied JSF RI 1.2 javadoc for setParent(UIComponent)
> >
> > Do we really have the "all clear" to copy JSF1.2 javadoc to MyFaces?
> > I know that one of the MyFaces developers stated that he had chatted
> > with Ed Burns (JSF1.2 spec lead) on IRC and had been told that the
> > license for JSF1.2 allowed this. But that's kind of informal.
> >
> > Has anyone actually read the license that the JSF1.2 javadoc is under,
> > and confirmed that it is acceptable to copy this into MyFaces 1.1.x?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Simon
>
>

Mime
View raw message