Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89198 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2005 10:43:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2005 10:43:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 27863 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2005 10:43:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 27837 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2005 10:43:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 27822 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2005 10:43:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:43:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of manfred.geiler@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.202 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.202] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:43:30 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i18so1580836wra for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:43:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eJjXGykYSsOd7NOOjnSlOa1JvtrgobCvFpANjYtZQPO9ewTLZMTHgNJineuNxzvNOr7l2Ou3fpy+IyQJvcax6bU6tPkFQpr+f1dYxGoRe5PSjUXMb0VjiCeUc6JZe4C73oolHT+k323gYh/kGXA4JgKla47RFtXDp6QtX39eNfQ= Received: by 10.54.2.56 with SMTP id 56mr168316wrb; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:43:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.94.1 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 03:43:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <564d4f68050909034333cc2678@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:43:13 +0200 From: Manfred Geiler Reply-To: manfred.geiler@gmail.com To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: Java 5 code in Sandbox ? In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <17183.12169.886854.884111@sun.com> <9eb65db00509071322293de413@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Just a sidenote: According to the spec the JSF 1.1 container itself must even be compatible to J2SE 1.3 ! Of course, this is no requirement for custom components. But, we should keep in mind, that the J2EE world is spinning a little bit slower than the J2SE client world... ;-) -Manfred 2005/9/8, Werner Punz : > Mathias Br=F6kelmann wrote: > > Just a note. JDK1.5 is able to produce 1.4 classes. We could change > > the build process to let the user choose which target he needs and > > still provide 1.4 classes (or both) in the releases. But let us bring > > the next release out before going that way. > > > Maintenance nightmare, I would not want to keep two codebases > in the long run. > I have moved from two projects from 1.4 to 1.5 and believe me, once > you made the switch and have started to use the new constructs, > it is close to impossible to go back, the backporting effort > is too big, once you have reached a certain point, which for sure you > will reach soon enough. >=20 >