myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Marinschek <martin.marinsc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: tags, branches and 'current'
Date Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:54:16 GMT
Ok, Bill,

can you take over here?

You tried this before?

regards,

Martin

On 9/23/05, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sigh.  How did we miss this one?  I thought we did a test of
> everything?  This is probably the only type of error where we could
> justify doing this although its kind of embarassing that it happened
> in the first place.
>
> Technically you can check into a tagged version so this is probably
> the best thing to do.  Let me know when its done (and tested) and I
> can do a rebuild and re-publish of the myfaces binary bundles over the
> weekend.
>
> sean
>
> On 9/23/05, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We have been discussing doing a release as the problem with the
> > faces-config.xml missing in the myfaces-all.jar is a very prominent
> > one ;)
> >
> > If there is a way of fixing the existing release with just the
> > faces-config.xml file, that would be better!
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 9/23/05, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > as long as 1_1_0 is ok to change (by convention tags are not
> > > > modified, only branches).
> > >
> > > Technically you can change it but SVN (at least Tortoise SVN) warns
> > > you and says its a tag and you shouldn't.  Why do we need a branch at
> > > this point?
> > >
> > > We could create a branch for it but lets establish why this is necessary first.
> > >
> > >
> > > > All I'm looking for is a place to change the release only enough to
> > > > get the faces-config.xml file in place (as well as the other missing
> > > > bits because that file is not found) and then get a new release
> > > > pushed out.
> > > >
> > > > Martin M is planning on doing another release from the trunk after I
> > > > finish my commit. That is fine but risky.
> > >
> > > We're doing a release?  I haven't read every message on the dev list
> > > but I must have missed this discussion.  What is the motivation for
> > > this?
> > >
> > > > TTFN,
> > > >
> > > > -bd-
> > >
> > > sean
> > >
> > > > On Sep 23, 2005, at 5:53 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -1
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that after I tagged the 1.1 release I created a external in
the
> > > > > "release" dir so if you use
> > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/release/1_1_0/ you will get
> > > > > "current" but for the release.  It doesn't include sandbox so its
not
> > > > > quite the same but sandbox is not part of the official release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Doesn't this give you what you need?
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/23/05, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I agree with Martin on this - if you need everything, you can
always
> > > > >> checkout MyFaces, right?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> regards,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Martin
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 9/23/05, Martin Cooper <martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Bill Dudney wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Well the idea is that people would then be using current/trunk
> > > > >>>> to checkout
> > > > >>>> instead of just current.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> But by definition, what's in branches and tags is not current,
so
> > > > >>> why does
> > > > >>> it make sense to include them under 'current'? The structure
you
> > > > >>> described
> > > > >>> is exactly what you have without using the 'current' external
in
> > > > >>> the first
> > > > >>> place, isn't it?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>> Martin Cooper
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> TTFN,
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> -bd-
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Bill Dudney wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Hi All,
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I'd like to propose that we change current to
be;
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> current
> > > > >>>>>>    /branches
> > > > >>>>>>    /tags
> > > > >>>>>>    /trunk
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Still all externals but tracking the group of
tags & branches
> > > > >>>>>> that are
> > > > >>>>>> common across all the subprojects.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> current/trunk -> becomes what we currently
call current
> > > > >>>>>> current/branches -> currently empty
> > > > >>>>>> current/tags -> 1_1_0 with externals to each
subproject's
> > > > >>>>>> 1_1_0 tag
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> I would recommend against doing that. It would mean
that
> > > > >>>>> everyone checking
> > > > >>>>> out 'current' would end up with multiple copies of
the entire
> > > > >>>>> source tree,
> > > > >>>>> which is unlikely to be something that they would
want.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Most people are unlikely to want more than one version
of the
> > > > >>>>> source at any
> > > > >>>>> given time, so I don't see a need to clump together
multiple
> > > > >>>>> versions in a
> > > > >>>>> single checkout.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> --
> > > > >>>>> Martin Cooper
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> To fix the faces-config.xml bug that's been identified
in the
> > > > >>>>>> 1_1_0
> > > > >>>>>> release we can create a branch in current/branches/1_1_0
that
> > > > >>>>>> uses
> > > > >>>>>> externals to the tags for everything but 'build'
which would
> > > > >>>>>> point to the
> > > > >>>>>> 1_1_0 branch in build (not yet created but I'd
be glad to do
> > > > >>>>>> that).
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Thoughts?
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> TTFN,
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> -bd-
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://www.irian.at
> > > > >> Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > >> JSF Trainings in English and German
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Trainings in English and German
> >
>


--

http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Trainings in English and German

Mime
View raw message