myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manfred Geiler <manfred.gei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [proposal] tobago component lib
Date Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:06:01 GMT
+1 subproject

2005/9/27, Mathias Brökelmann <mbroekelmann@googlemail.com>:
> +1 for subproject
>
> 2005/9/27, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com>:
> > Yes, a separate subproject is ok,
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > 2005/9/27, Thomas Spiegl <thomas.spiegl@gmail.com>:
> > > sounds reasonable
> > >  +1 for separate subproject
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/26/05, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > for separate subproject just like tomahawk
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 9/26/05, Sean Schofield < sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > For now everything should be more or less separate.  Tobago is an
> > > > > incubator project so its not going to be part of myfaces for some
> > > > > time.  I'm not sure if they are planning to use the "share" subproject
> > > > > but they should definitely have their own jar, TLD and
> > > > > faces-config.xml (same as my position on the sandbox.)
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/26/05, Werner Punz <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since the Tobago guys have sent their CLA paperworks to
the ASF,
> > > > > > > we now have to decide how that thing will really work :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We discussed in an older thread that they are olny committing
into
> > > the
> > > > > > > "tobago" source code base and not into myfaces (api|core|tomahawk)
> > > > > > > (remember the "gentlement's agreement" mail :-))
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So we have figure out how that will work...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So should we create a new subproject in SVN for "tobago"?
Sean
> > > brought
> > > > > > > this up in another thread.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Perhaps a subproject  makes most sense... Because we will
have than
> > > > > > > "families" of components:
> > > > > > > -tomahawk
> > > > > > > -tobago
> > > > > > > -sandbox
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 for separate taglibs (finally I am allowed to vote ;-) ),
the main
> > > reason for this is, that
> > > > > > the tobago components overal to a certain degree functionality
wise
> > > > > > yet they cannot be mixed with tomahawk for now.
> > > > > > Also we might get other component libs in the long run under
the
> > > myfaces
> > > > > > umbrella...
> > > > > > Id say that a different taglib compatible to the myfaces core
> > > > > > is a good idea.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Trainings in English and German
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Mathias
>

Mime
View raw message