myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manfred Geiler <manfred.gei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release decisions
Date Fri, 09 Sep 2005 12:31:16 GMT
+1
Thanks Sean,
-Manfred

2005/9/9, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com>:
> So are we ok to build a release candidate now?  If so, I will try and
> get one up this weekend.
> 
> sean
> 
> On 9/8/05, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > 2005/9/8, Ron <ron@ronsmits.org>:
> > > +1
> > > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 13:26 -0400, Abrams, Howard A wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:24 AM
> > > > > To: MyFaces Development
> > > > > Subject: Release decisions
> > > > >
> > > > > I just fixed an important stumbling block in the build script so
now
> > > > > it should be possible to build a release *without* the sandbox stuff
> > > > > (and without the build crashing.)  There have been a lot of changes
to
> > > > > the HEAD during the past week, so I'm not sure how we should proceed.
> > > > >
> > > > > My thinking is that we should rebuild the 1_0_10 tag/branch with
the
> > > > > newest code and just heavily test.  I think there is too much stuff
in
> > > > > the HEAD that we would want.  But at some point we need to freeze
the
> > > > > 1.0.10 code.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I propose that I make a new 1.0.10 branch off the latest code
and
> > > > > that we use that to build a release candidate.  Only the most
> > > > > important bugs (such as missing stuff from the release bundle) would
> > > > > then be addressed in 1.0.10.  Last minute requests for fixing specific
> > > > > bugs will be fixed on the trunk but they won't go into 1.0.10.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can I get a few +1's on that?
> > > > >
> > > > > sean
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message