myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manfred Geiler <manfred.gei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [proposal] TLD changes
Date Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:34:59 GMT
+1 for sbx

And what about "thk" or "tmhk" for tomahawk?

Having 2, 3 or 4 character namespaces is
 * Bad news for vi addicts - so sorry about that ;-)
 * no problem for IDE users with "IntelliSense" or WYSIWYG Editor users

My 0.2

-Manfred



2005/8/2, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com>:
> 'sbx' is exactly what i was thinking about.  In english 'ts' has a
> certain meaning though ('tough shit') which is a unsympathetic way to
> say 'If you don't like it too bad for you.'  ;-)
> 
> sean
> 
> On 8/2/05, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 0.5
> > After all that time using the 'x', changing to 't' is a big change as
> > we all have got used to 'x'. The massive replace is needed, and
> > existing production applications could change progressively from 'x'
> > to 't' as the prefix is defined in each page. I do agree that it is
> > more natural to use the 't' now that the components+extensions
> > subproject it is called tomahawk and for new users the 't' might be
> > more understandable than an x. Also, what Dennis points out has been
> > said some times in the past and it is not the first time the 'x'
> > debate is started....
> > Maybe for the sandbox we could use a 2 or 3-letter prefix, such as
> > 'sx' (then the 'x' would have more sense for the Xtensions) or 'sbx'.
> > Or maybe 'ts' (tomahawk sandbox)...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > 2005/8/2, Dennis_Byrne@ak.blm.gov <Dennis_Byrne@ak.blm.gov>:
> > >
> > > From a user's perspective, I felt slightly jilted by the 'x' because that is
> > > what I and everyone else have always used for the JSTL XML taglib - which is
> > > pretty popular, and to my knowledge, "claimed it" first.
> > >
> > > Dennis Byrne
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message