Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of brunoaranda@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.205 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Wd3zJ35xECSgDvipraG61bIDcA5CkuAXPESA3BrFSk+cVngVKgOhovWXwdzGaddPKC3TrU8H9TP7KFXeVwNOlyrsfOZvoVxhkqpEXXyJdnAT/CLSwmp71YsMIvg7mCshyC4ytZH2GoNIXwgVX9DcD66aoeuhvQUrMTsszXQEh6o=
Message-ID: <1a681ff205070903584a14a371@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 12:58:39 +0200
From: Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com>
To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org>, werpu@gmx.at
Subject: Re: Two Input Suggests (Lets not go down this road again)
In-Reply-To: <dan2kp$r2c$2@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <2387fbc505070811414a905e96@mail.gmail.com>
	 <dan1je$psq$1@sea.gmane.org> <dan26d$r2c$1@sea.gmane.org>
	 <dan2kp$r2c$2@sea.gmane.org>

I am sure we will reach a consensus on this and get the best component
possible. I give you my opinion in both components, not knowing the
insights of any of them.
Regarding the name of the component, I like more the name
'inputSuggest', because it is easy to remember and someone who do not
know what this component does will associate directly to Google's
suggest. I like more the suggestions scroll-box of the Matt-Sean
component as it seams cleaner, but I like the input box coloring of
Werner's component. Both of them are great so the result of the merge
would be even greater!

Regards,

Bruno

- Suggestions display: I like more the scroll box of the=20
2005/7/9, Werner Punz <werpu@gmx.at>:
> Werner Punz wrote:
> >
> > Actually just checked the sources I got in today from the svn sandbox,
> > there is nothing from me left anymore :-D
> > Command back, that suff is from someone else, but they placed the code
> > for the autocomplete on top of the prototype which is excellent
> >
> >
> Btw... another thing, I checked the code for the new autocomplete
> Javascripts, it is absolutely excellent.
> Unfortunately it has the same component leak problems like the effects.
>=20
> (I am not sure, but I think the guy who wrote this stuff,
> basically must be the same one I contacted yesterday, because of a
> component leak problem in the basic effects code)
>=20
>