myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Dudney <bdud...@mac.com>
Subject Re: [proposal] JavaDoc from the spec?
Date Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:27:20 GMT
always easier to ask forgiveness than permission, I love it! :-)

TTFN,

-bd-

On Jul 21, 2005, at 7:04 AM, Martin Marinschek wrote:

> I would say that yes, it is OK.
>
> we could of course just do it and see what happens ;)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 7/21/05, Bill Dudney <bdudney@mac.com> wrote:
> From reading the license we will need a lawyer :-)
>
> Looks like paragraphs 2-5 are the important ones
>
> http://tinyurl.com/bd4hf
>
> I think paragraph 2 gives us the license to copy the javadoc. Esp
> part i & iii, can we fully implement the spec or pass the user guide
> part of the TCK without the javadocs? Since pg 38 of the spec
> (version 1.2_PR)  explicitly says the javadoc are part of the spec
> (older versions f the spec say the same thing) we probably have the
> license to copy them.
>
> Just my thoughts from the bit of research I've been able to do this  
> am.
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2005, at 6:01 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > I'm +1 for that as long as Craig and Sun are +1
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 7/21/05, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello, any lawyer listening that *really* understands the
> >> Sun.CfcsSpec.license.11.14.2003?
> >> Is it allowed to copy and (re)use text from the spec. Would that be
> >> kind of "reproduction", which is only allowed for private use
> >> according to the spec license?
> >> I don't know.
> >>
> >> -Manfred
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2005/7/21, Bill Dudney <bdudney@mac.com>:
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> Is there an issue with copying the javadoc from the spec  
> classes? I
> >>> remember someone said we could not use the jsf-api.jar file a long
> >>> time ago but the java doc is part of the spec. We should be  
> able to
> >>> copy that correct? So I'd like to propose that as I'm adding
> >>> tests to
> >>> the javax.faces.* packages that I also add javadoc to these  
> classes.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> TTFN,
> >>>
> >>> -bd-
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>


Mime
View raw message