myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Marinschek <martin.marinsc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: proposal: consolodate examples/standard & examples/simple
Date Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:26:44 GMT
There is a page for that,

but as I said before - I am far from being finished, it doesn't work now ;)

I just had to check it in as I wanted to work on it from home as well.

regards,

Martin

On 7/10/05, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cancel that.  I just remembered that I added a simple example for
> inputSuggest.  Its already in the simple webapp.
> 
> I will turn the question around to you then ... can you provide a
> simple example for the ajax variant?
> 
> sean
> 
> On 7/9/05, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree no hurry (I'm still working on reorg follow up.)
> >
> > Matt, can you possibly provide this?
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On 7/9/05, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yes, no hurry with that one..
> > >
> > > It's really just there for trying out the AJAX stuff right now, and I
> > > will sure want to merge the two component's feature sets later on...
> > >
> > > So let's wait until it matures a little.
> > >
> > > In the meantime, could you provide a sample page for the inputSuggest?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 7/10/05, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > That's fine to demonstrate the layout stuff but we could do that with
> > > > a few foo.jsp pages instead of confusing things by duplicating all of
> > > > the examples.
> > > >
> > > > I will reserve comment on ajaxInputSuggest and how it fits in the
> > > > sandbox until I have a chance to see it up close.
> > > >
> > > > sean
> > > >
> > > > On 7/9/05, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Well, there is another thing the old examples are illustrating -
> > > > > wasn't that the layout stuff? I wonder if Manfred and Thomas are
keen
> > > > > on having an example for them as well in the new examples app.
> > > > >
> > > > > Apart from that, a +1 from me...
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/9/05, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > This brings another issue to my mind. What we should do with
the
> > > > > > sandbox components. IMO they should be clearly separated of
the
> > > > > > tomahawk ones. I would do another war (like it is currently)
for this,
> > > > > > or, if not, a new section of the examples with warnings, alerts,
> > > > > > use-at-your-own-risks, etc regarding the possible unstability
of the
> > > > > > sandbox components.
> > > > > > BTW, I've seen that the ajaxInputSuggest example uses the prefix
's'
> > > > > > for the sandbox taglib.  For me, it is OK, we should warn to
everybody
> > > > > > using sandbox components in its applications that when a sandbox
> > > > > > component goes to tomahawk the prefix will change from 's' to
'x'.
> > > > > > I've seen that Sean has used the prefix 'x' for the inputSuggest
> > > > > > example, as it is alone in the page and there are no tomahawk
> > > > > > components in the example. But, if we did this we could not
put both
> > > > > > sandbox and tomahawk components in the same page...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bruno
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2005/7/8, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2005/7/8, Grant Smith <grants@marathon-man.com>:
> > > > > > > >  +1 for consolidation, yet with separate areas for
non-jsCookMenu-cluttered
> > > > > > > > stuff.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > >  Can we get a few more +1's for this?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/7/05, Bill Dudney <bdudney@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  yes now the cobwebs are clearing...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > if we get agreement I'd be up for getting rid of standard
and making
> > > > > > > > a JSCookMenu example.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TTFN,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -bd-
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Jul 7, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  A little background ...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I created the simple examples because they had way
less HTML
> > > > > > > > cluttering them up because they were not running inside
of menus, etc.
> > > > > > > >  We still needed an example that showed off JSCookMenu
so people
> > > > > > > > argued that we should keep the old examples around
for this purpose.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > When I did the reorg, I created an svn:external for
the src in simple
> > > > > > > > so that it points to the standard. So the source code
is *exactly*
> > > > > > > > the same.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I would like to stop maintaining the two sets of examples
as you
> > > > > > > > propose. When we create a new component nobody is
going to want to
> > > > > > > > add it to both examples and so they will get hopelessly
out of sync
> > > > > > > > over time. I would suggest dropping standard examples
and adding a
> > > > > > > > few fancy JSCookMenu examples, etc. to simple (that
show off what
> > > > > > > > standard was trying to do.) That will take a little
bit of time so we
> > > > > > > > need a volunteer (if we can get agreement.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > sean
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 7/7/05, Bill Dudney <bdudney@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  Hi All,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It appears that the code in examples/standard and
the code in simple/
> > > > > > > > standard is the same. Any objections to getting rid
of one or the
> > > > > > > > other?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TTFN,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -bd-
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  .
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message