myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Schofield <sean.schofi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should we include javdoc in binary distro?
Date Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:24:14 GMT
Sounds good.  Manfred is right that it was always included.  The
javadocs will be separated by subproject as well.  That will be nice.

sean

On 6/28/05, James Cooper <ardneh321@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the TLD javadoc should definitely be included in the distro,
> and would not mind seeing the core TLD as well.
> 
> My two cents worth,
> James
> 
> On 6/28/05, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What do people think about including javadoc in the binary distro?
> > Obviously the javadoc won't be in the SVN but should it be included in
> > the distro?  What about the javadoc for the TLD?
> >
> > sean
> >
>

Mime
View raw message