Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of manfred.geiler@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.203 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=kgvgizoWXPtDMF2G60p8i0JHhJpKVGywJ4vK3Z2FwFlFPEofMNeH1GDR/FFAxmU/XvX6L3aqAvMWjM/COD3Uz/6OMdTIYLMciFBC4+4h+ETQlQAnB0nj5NM+7HQ/gx8EWp47mT+030MLVsRK1mN/QGt8PXrLFTOCik9E0pIh2Wk=
Message-ID: <564d4f680505190023183331b7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:23:29 +0200
From: Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org>,
	Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sandbox
In-Reply-To: <2387fbc505051815113edfd478@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <428251DA.4010605@marathon-man.com>
	 <2387fbc5050511122810140cfd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8b3ce37905051503248d442e9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5a99335f050515093525feaa4a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5a99335f05051509402e4c265f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20050515103749.S42063@minotaur.apache.org>
	 <2387fbc505051512317a758667@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8b3ce3790505151633642cf308@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5a99335f050515175376415a2c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2387fbc505051815113edfd478@mail.gmail.com>

+1

-Manfred

2005/5/19, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com>:
> I propose that we go ahead and create a sandbox area and at a minimum
> it can be used by committers (such as myself) who have existing code
> they want to get feedback on.  Those that want to contribute a
> component and work within the confines of the sandbox rules (a myfaces
> committer has to commit your code and patches) can also volunteer
> components.
>=20
> Can we agree on this principle?  I will come up with a proposal for a
> specific SVN structure this weekend but for now we need agreement on
> the concept.
>=20
> sean
>=20
>=20
> On 5/15/05, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, I think that should finally be sorted out ;)
> >
> > And we will try to err to the best of the ASF, promised.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 5/16/05, Ted Husted <ted.husted@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 5/15/05, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > It's not a question of what you *think* you can maintain. If you =
bring an
> > > > > external code base into the ASF repository, you *must be committe=
d* - as a
> > > > > community, not one or two individuals - to maintaining it and res=
olving
> > > > > any technical issues, not to mention resolving any legal issues *=
before*
> > > > > it touches the ASF repository. If there is even a hint that this =
is not
> > > > > the case, you should go through the incubator.
> > > >
> > > > In the case of Jesse's SF code it doesn't sound like incubator is
> > > > required.  This is based on Craig's detailed explanation as well as
> > > > common sense.  According to Craig it is fine for a few individuals =
to
> > > > work off list on things and then offer them to the community for
> > > > inclusion.  Its up to the PMC to decide whether or not that code
> > > > should then go in the sandbox or could be added directly to the sou=
rce
> > > > code proper.
> > >
> > > According to Craig, it is fine for *committers* to work of list and t=
hen ...
> > >
> > > I haven't reviewed Jesse's SF code. But if it's on the scale of custo=
m
> > > JSP tag, then you might have Jesse file a CLA and accept the donation
> > > directly to the MyFaces project. If the contribution is more than a
> > > tag library, with several interacting tags, then it might be
> > > significant enough to pass through the Incubator.
> > >
> > > Whether you put the component into the trunk, or into a sandbox, is a
> > > separate issue than whether the project or the incubator accepts the
> > > donation.
> > >
> > > Some projects use a sandbox to develop new code and then decide
> > > whether to make it part of the standard distribution (merge it with
> > > the trunk).
> > >
> > > The Incubator Project is the Foundation's "front controller" for
> > > significant, or extra-ordinary,  code donations.
> > >
> > > HTH (really I do!), Ted :)
> > >
> >
>