myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Marinschek <martin.marinsc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: New x:htmlTag component
Date Tue, 24 May 2005 05:48:03 GMT
Very good idea!

+1 from me for that, I'd sure as hell love to get rid of those
f:verbatim tags all over the place.

regards,

Martin

On 5/24/05, Sylvain Vieujot <svieujot@apache.org> wrote:
>  For the example, you are right, if the text is that ... just text.
>  But as it often occurs to be more complex (with tags, ...), you end up
> having to need both.
> 
>  
>  On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 00:21 -0400, Sean Schofield wrote: 
>  Sounds interesting. I will try to put forward a formal sandbox
> proposal for us to vote on later this week. This sounds like a good
> candidate for sandbox. I've got a component of my own for the sandbox
> as well.
> 
> sean
> 
> btw, in your example wouldn't you only need <f:verbatim><h1>bla
> blah</h1></f:verbatim> ?
> 
> On 5/23/05, Sylvain Vieujot <svieujot@apache.org> wrote:
> > I'm preparing a new component to render html tags :
> > 
> > <x:htmlTag value="h1">bla bla</x:htmlTag>
> > would render : <h1>bla bla</h1>
> > 
> > The goal is to avoid the <f:verbatim><h1></f:verbatim>bla
> > bla<f:verbatim></h1></f:verbatim> codes.
> > ... and to avoid doing one component by html tag (like the very usefull
> > <x:div>).
> > 
> > Any suggestion ?
> > Any better tag name ?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Sylvain.
> 
>

Mime
View raw message