Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19351 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2005 18:07:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2005 18:07:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 27930 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2005 18:07:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-myfaces-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27891 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2005 18:07:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact myfaces-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list myfaces-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27878 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2005 18:07:23 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_SBL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mailgwvw01.freelance.com (HELO mailgwvw01.freelance.com) (207.234.129.118) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:07:22 -0800 Received: from mailgwvw02.freelance.com (mailgwvw02.freelance.com [207.234.129.52]) by mailgwvw01.freelance.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j27I858Q010505; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:08:05 +0100 Received: from 10.0.0.101 ([200.88.145.229]) by mailgwvw02.freelance.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2005030719071813:197 ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:07:18 +0100 Subject: Re: Better popup calendar From: Sylvain Vieujot To: martin@marinschek.com Cc: MyFaces Development In-Reply-To: <5a99335f050307100222d7e4d5@mail.gmail.com> References: <2045566240.1110215697578.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> <1110216441.6927.73.camel@localhost.localdomain> <2387fbc5050307094548c6b1c@mail.gmail.com> <5a99335f050307100222d7e4d5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:07:17 -0400 Message-Id: <1110218837.6927.76.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailgw01/Freelance(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 03/07/2005 07:07:18 PM, Serialize by Router on mailgw01/Freelance(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 03/07/2005 07:07:18 PM, Serialize complete at 03/07/2005 07:07:18 PM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-cMnZoCOxLmymUTQJW+MH" X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mailgwvw01.freelance.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/632/Thu Dec 16 14:15:42 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on mailgwvw01.freelance.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --=-cMnZoCOxLmymUTQJW+MH Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain The 2 calendar from javascript.internet.com are not that better than the one we have now. I'll make an email asking for an ASL version agreement. I'll let you know. Sylvain. On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 19:02 +0100, Martin Marinschek wrote: > Unfortunately the two licences are not compatible - we have had this > discussion before, and this is why we have the calendar as is, that > one was licensed under a very unrestrictive license (the main > difference to the LGPL is that under the LGPL, all changes to the > source base need to be given back to the source base, if I remember > correctly.) > > You could always go and ask the developer, though, if he would either > change the license to the ASL or if he would give out a version under > the ASL. > > regards, > > Martin > > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:45:26 -0500, Sean Schofield > wrote: > > I always thought it would be nice to provide a few different styles of > > calendars. Here is the one we use now in our current application > > (we've made some configuration changes so its not exactly the same): > > > > http://www.javascriptkit.com/script/script2/timestamp.shtml > > > > This is also a nice one: > > > > http://javascript.internet.com/calendars/date-picker.html > > > > sean > > > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:34:27 -0600, Heath Borders > > wrote: > > > If it isn't, we could just make a JSF wrapper to utilize the existing > > > code. Then if people wanted to use it, they could access that code > > > separately. Of course, this would be a lot more work, and might not > > > be worth it if this wasn't a phenomenally better calendar. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:27:21 -0400, Sylvain Vieujot wrote: > > > > I've found this http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/ (popup) calendar, > > > > that looks quite better than the one we're using now. > > > > > > > > It's released under the LGPL. > > > > Does anyone know if it's ok to unclude LGLP code in Apache licensed projects > > > > ? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Sylvain. > > > > > > -- > > > -Heath Borders-Wing > > > hborders@mail.win.org > > > > > --=-cMnZoCOxLmymUTQJW+MH Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 The 2 calendar from javascript.internet.com are not that better than the one we have now.

I'll make an email asking for an ASL version agreement.

I'll let you know.

Sylvain.

On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 19:02 +0100, Martin Marinschek wrote: 
Unfortunately the two licences are not compatible - we have had this
discussion before, and this is why we have the calendar as is, that
one was licensed under a very unrestrictive license (the main
difference to the LGPL is that under the LGPL, all changes to the
source base need to be given back to the source base, if I remember
correctly.)

You could always go and ask the developer, though, if he would either
change the license to the ASL or if he would give out a version under
the ASL.

regards,

Martin


On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:45:26 -0500, Sean Schofield
<sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> I always thought it would be nice to provide a few different styles of
> calendars.  Here is the one we use now in our current application
> (we've made some configuration changes so its not exactly the same):
> 
> http://www.javascriptkit.com/script/script2/timestamp.shtml
> 
> This is also a nice one:
> 
> http://javascript.internet.com/calendars/date-picker.html
> 
> sean
> 
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:34:27 -0600, Heath Borders
> <heath.borders@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If it isn't, we could just make a JSF wrapper to utilize the existing
> > code.  Then if people wanted to use it, they could access that code
> > separately.  Of course, this would be a lot more work, and might not
> > be worth it if this wasn't a phenomenally better calendar.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:27:21 -0400, Sylvain Vieujot <svieujot@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I've found this http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/ (popup) calendar,
> > > that looks quite better than the one we're using now.
> > >
> > > It's released under the LGPL.
> > > Does anyone know if it's ok to unclude LGLP code in Apache licensed projects
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Sylvain.
> >
> > --
> > -Heath Borders-Wing
> > hborders@mail.win.org
> >
>
--=-cMnZoCOxLmymUTQJW+MH--