myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Heath Borders <heath.bord...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Refactored Examples
Date Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:04:02 GMT
I'd prefer to have our test-cases managed with cactus tests, but from
a learning perspective, it will be a lot easier with single-component
pages.


On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:19:57 +0100, Martin Marinschek
<martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> After looking at the examples again, I believe that Sean is right - we
> should have two sample applications: one showing MyFaces in action
> (that is the current examples app right now), with the framework
> showing off what it can do, and one very simple one where each
> component is demonstrated with several test cases for it (the
> framework around the components reduced to a min.)
> 
> so still a +1 from me.
> 
> regards,
> 
> Martin
> 
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:32:25 -0500, Sean Schofield
> <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I did apply your patch on my local box.
> > > The examples are much smaller(simpler?)
> >
> > That was the idea.
> >
> > > But JSCookMenu is now missing, if I see all... ;)
> >
> > I think I mentioned that in my intial email.  I'm not too familiar
> > with that one so if you or someone else could add that in that would
> > be great.
> >
> > > Ok, for others... I made a upload for an example WAR
> > >
> > > go for
> > > http://www.apache.org/~matzew/myfaces-sean.war
> > >
> > > and look.
> > >
> > > I liked the *old* example web app... since it was
> > > more a web app :-)
> >
> > Yes but it makes it harder to understand each individual component.
> > Are you just making a comment or are you -1 on this?
> >
> > > But the new version is perhaps more easier for starters?
> >
> > I think so.  Actually its easier for developers (me) too ;-)  When I
> > was working on the tree example I had to maintain a separate example
> > for myself and then remember to copy everything over to the new
> > example.  I think the examples should be as simple as possible so the
> > user can focus on the minimum requirements for the component in
> > question.
> >
> > Is everyone still in agreement on this?
> >
> > > -Matthias
> >
> > sean
> >
> 


-- 
-Heath Borders-Wing
hborders@mail.win.org

Mime
View raw message