Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39537 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2005 22:10:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2005 22:10:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 82126 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2005 22:10:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-myfaces-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82075 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2005 22:10:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact myfaces-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list myfaces-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82062 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2005 22:10:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of sean.schofield@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.200 as permitted sender) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:10:56 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so526551wra for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:10:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=JkAjjRkbv/VprjmScp3cFWvA9rua3EHUUA01h64ys1NyO+UwiIaTXtWdgHGzXRpOLl84hp4x9BDCxWo4PGvjxavNDCw38KGJLwmmnCs4ITulQoJMDYPn1ulHOujmATKe8bOyhPS/VQr3CnlqRzQzzkraGZhOA0JIP2yE9NOZhHY= Received: by 10.54.31.37 with SMTP id e37mr9001wre; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:10:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.10.11 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:10:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2387fbc5050218141038e18b5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:10:53 -0500 From: Sean Schofield Reply-To: Sean Schofield To: MyFaces Development , martin@marinschek.com Subject: Re: Extending TagSupport In-Reply-To: <5a99335f05021809222442768c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <42161C88.90701@matthias-wessendorf.de> <5a99335f05021809222442768c@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N A few of those tags are related to the soon to be obsolete Tree Control. So I wouldn't worry too much about them. sean On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:22:15 +0100, Martin Marinschek wrote: > those tags just don't need the JSF-tab base clazz behaviour... > > they are almost non-JSF ;) > > regards, > > Martin > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:49:12 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am looking at some Tag clazzes and saw that most > > extend one of (our) JSF base tag clazzes. > > > > But some extend TagSupport, which isn't a JSF tag clazz... > > > > These clazzes are: > > -UpdateActionListenerTag > > -IconProviderTag > > -TabChangeListenerTag > > -TreeSelectionListenerTag > > > > Is there any special reason, I just can't see? > > > > Thanks, > > Matthias > > >