Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46154 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2005 06:57:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2005 06:57:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 70181 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2005 06:57:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-myfaces-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70132 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2005 06:57:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact myfaces-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list myfaces-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70119 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2005 06:57:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:57:08 -0800 Received: from [212.227.126.209] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CuQ41-0004Q4-00; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:57:05 +0100 Received: from [217.83.93.182] (helo=[192.168.2.100]) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CuQ41-0001O1-00; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:57:05 +0100 Message-ID: <41F9E212.9040805@matthias-wessendorf.de> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:56:18 +0100 From: Matthias Wessendorf Reply-To: matzew@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MyFaces-Dev CC: Jonas Jacobi Subject: [JAR] myfaces.jar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:157ed430dbf2887568e54eb61bfb58ed X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all, I got email from Jonas (Oracle) and he asked why we provide myfaces.jar and a standalone version (api, extention, impl, wml) I remember, that we did a split in *old* SF codebase. Craig mentioned splitting them should be cleaner. But now there is again a myfaces.jar and also the standalone version. (http://tinyurl.com/4skb6) Shouldn't we better keep the separate instead a all-in-one JAR? Any thoughts? Thanks, Matthias