myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "sean schofield (JIRA)" <incubator-...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (MYFACES-85) Non-standard attributes in the html taglibs
Date Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:33:17 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-85?page=history ]

sean schofield updated MYFACES-85:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: ext_forceId_attribute.xml

New entity file for the forceId attribute (this is conjunction with the patch should fix the
problem for forceId attribute.)  Transient attribute still needs to be addressed (I am hoping
the person who know transient best will step forward ...)

> Non-standard attributes in the html taglibs
> -------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MYFACES-85
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-85
>      Project: MyFaces
>         Type: Bug
>     Versions: 1.0.7 beta, 1.0.8 beta
>     Reporter: sean schofield
>  Attachments: ext_forceId_attribute.xml, forceIdAttribute.patch
>
> I noticed that some of the extended attributes have crept into the standard HTML taglibs.
 For instance, you can set a property of transient on <h:form>.  These should be limited
to the extended HTML tags only.  I believe they are just ignored in the standard case but
they should not be in the TLD.  IDE tools like JBuilder also show these as available attributes
which is incorrect.
> So far I've identified transient and the new forceId attribute.  forceId is there because
I was basically following the pattern of transient.  Both are defined in the 'ui_component_attributes.xml'
file which I believe applies to all of the HTML tags (both standard and extended.)  This should
be changed so that they only apply to the correct extended tags that actually support the
properties.  (There is already a comment in that file questioning the appropriateness of using
the attribute here so apparently at least someone else already agrees with me on this.)
> I will try to work on a patch for forceId shortly.  The person responsible for the transient
property might want to patch that one.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message