Return-Path: 
 <myfaces-dev-return-272-apmail-incubator-myfaces-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67548 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2004 00:49:09 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Dec 2004 00:49:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 45312 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2004 00:49:08 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-myfaces-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 45260 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2004 00:49:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact myfaces-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:myfaces-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:myfaces-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:myfaces-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <myfaces-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <myfaces-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list myfaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 45244 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2004 00:49:08 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from mail.wildehor.de (HELO mail.wildehor.de) (213.238.32.130)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:49:05 -0800
Received: from [213.238.32.130] (helo=server.wildehor.de)
	by mail.wildehor.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CjoSm-00077t-Ku
	for myfaces-dev@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 01:46:48 +0100
In-Reply-To: <000a01c4ede3$dc78a630$6402a8c0@fumakilla>
To: "MyFaces Development" <myfaces-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Shale for 2.x? (was Re: RoadMap)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 September 26, 2003
Message-ID: 
 <OF4B34972B.14C102D1-ONC1256F7A.00027F33-C1256F7A.00047D98@wildehor.de>
From: carsten@wildehor.de
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 01:46:57 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on nands/NandS(Release 6.5.1|January 28,
 2004) at 12/30/2004
 01:46:48 AM,
	Serialize complete at 12/30/2004 01:46:48 AM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="=_alternative 00047D8DC1256F7A_="
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 00047D8DC1256F7A_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

What is the main pruposal of MyFaces? I see 
a: the need of an open source implementation of JSF and 
b: like the idea to implement 'extras' to give the open source 
implamantation a real meaning to use it *g*

In my opinion shale and similar projects are trying to fill a gap for 
existing applications or programmers which have not the possibility to 
change to jsf completly. I developed a application for a company with 
realy many cooperations so struts ore jsf was no alternative for us 
because of branding problems and similars. I would realy like to see the 
focus of the MyFaces on the JSF implementation with performance and 
stability with the plus of realy needed or 'neat' components to higher the 
aceptance. Trying to assimilate the one or other project should be the 
third or further focus to get some attention for developers which have not 
the chance to decide which technology to use but giving them a plus for 
the decicionmaker. My opinion is definetly egoistic but i think it is the 
only chance to deliver extraordinary good code. (even better than sun's 
(sooorry lars *g* )).

It that sense and do not flame me please

Carsten Fregin

P.S.
This is my 11 beer with my investor so please are mercyfull with my bad 
english and typos *g*

--=_alternative 00047D8DC1256F7A_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">What is the main pruposal of MyFaces?
I see </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">a: the need of an open source implementation
of JSF and </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">b: like the idea to implement 'extras'
to give the open source implamantation a real meaning to use it *g*</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">In my opinion shale and similar projects
are trying to fill a gap for existing applications or programmers which
have not the possibility to change to jsf completly. I developed a application
for a company with realy many cooperations so struts ore jsf was no alternative
for us because of branding problems and similars. I would realy like to
see the focus of the MyFaces on the JSF implementation with performance
and stability with the plus of realy needed or 'neat' components to higher
the aceptance. Trying to assimilate the one or other project should be
the third or further focus to get some attention for developers which have
not the chance to decide which technology to use but giving them a plus
for the decicionmaker. My opinion is definetly egoistic but i think it
is the only chance to deliver extraordinary good code. (even better than
sun's (sooorry lars *g* )).</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">It that sense and do not flame me please</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Carsten Fregin</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">P.S.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">This is my 11 beer with my investor
so please are mercyfull with my bad english and typos *g*</font>
<br>
--=_alternative 00047D8DC1256F7A_=--