mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Wall <mjw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Ownership of discuss.mxnet.io
Date Sun, 05 Jul 2020 16:24:56 GMT
Did a ticket ever get opened for this?  I can open one, but want to
verify my understanding:

"We want to explore the possibility of hosting discuss.mxnet.io and
discuss.gluon.ai on Apache infrastructure and hook into Apache user
management."

Shane also asked if we started a conversation with Brand management.
How can I help there?

Mike

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:03 AM Marco de Abreu <marco.g.abreu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think we can start by opening a ticket with infra referring to this
> thread.
>
> -Marco
>
> Sheng Zha <szha.pvg@gmail.com> schrieb am Do., 18. Juni 2020, 09:45:
>
> > Hi Shane,
> >
> > Thanks for the comment. With my apache hat on, I definitely agree that it
> > would be better to have such forum on Apache managed infra. I’ve started
> > with discussion archive to ensure that everything is recorded, and I think
> > I can quickly try to make the backups of that forum accessible to the PPMC
> > and Apache infra.
> >
> > I think the best way to achieve the goal of continuity, eventually, would
> > be to host it on Apache infrastructure and have its hosting funded by ASF.
> > How do we go about requesting this?
> >
> > As for the trademark review, we started working on reviewing the binary
> > distribution usage and are currently focusing on the more pressing issue
> > there. We will get to the domain name usage afterwards.
> >
> > -sz
> >
> > > On Jun 17, 2020, at 6:07 AM, Shane Curcuru <asf@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2020/06/12 22:39:10, Marco de Abreu <marco.g.abreu@gmail.com>
> > wrote: ...
> > >> The mxnet.io domain is not under control of the ASF. If we say that a
> > user
> > >> facing platform is managed and endorsed by the PPMC, we should make it
> > >> available under the ASF domain system to further represent the official
> > >> affiliation. Also, it removes a weak link in the chain - e.g. the case
> > when
> > >> the mxnet.io domain ran out and broke quite a bit of stuff. Since the
> > ASF
> > >> offers subdomains for projects, I don't see any reason why not to use
> > them.
> > >
> > > This is the core issue for me, from the larger Apache perspective.
> > > Domain names using Apache marks - especially when they have interactive
> > > traffic about the Apache project itself - work best when the domain name
> > > itself is owned by the ASF.  That ensures continuity for the future, in
> > > the case where a party (which includes individual PMC members) stops
> > > contributing to the project.  When the ASF Infra team has direct admin
> > > access to a service or domain, we know that the ASF will be able to
> > > manage it for the future.
> > >
> > > Also, has the PPMC worked with Apache Brand Management on use of
> > > trademarks in domain names?
> > >
> > >  https://apache.org/foundation/marks/domains
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > - Shane
> > >  Director & Member
> > >  The Apache Software Foundation
> >

Mime
View raw message