mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kshitij Kalambarkar <kshitijkalambar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc1
Date Wed, 22 Jul 2020 06:56:46 GMT
+ 1

* Built from source on Ubuntu 18.04 with CUDA, CUDNN
* Verified test_higher_order_grad.py

Great job!

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:02 PM Chaitanya Bapat <chai.bapat@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> - Built from source on Ubuntu18 with CUDA ON, USE_INT64_TENSOR_SIZE ON
> - Verified large tensor tests work as expected on a p3.16xl instance [with
> 8 Tesla V100 GPUs]
> - Verified OpPerf utility works as expected.
>
> Steps followed:
> https://gist.github.com/ChaiBapchya/8a5131932693d4ca47281368c752b726
>
> Thanks Ciyong for leading with the releases. Incredible job.
>
> Regards,
> Chai
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 23:05, Karan Jariwala <karankjariwala@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Build from source on Ubuntu 18 with CUDA/CUDNN/NCCL ON and verified with
> > Horovod 0.19.5 by running unittest and integration tests.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Karan
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:23 PM Sheng Zha <zhasheng@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1. I checked:
> > >
> > > [x] Are release files in correct location? Yes
> > > [x] Do release files have the word incubating in their name? Yes
> > > [x] Are the digital signature and hashes correct? Yes
> > > [x] Does DISCLAIMER file exist? Yes, DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > > [x] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists? Yes
> > > [x] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
> > > Yes, though the license still reads "Copyright [yyyy] [name of
> copyright
> > > owner]", which needs correction.
> > >
> > > [x] Is the NOTICE year correct? Yes
> > > [x] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
> > > NOTICE?
> > > No. mshadow is now contributed to MXNet via software grant and should
> be
> > > removed from NOTICE.
> > >
> > > [x] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE? Confirmed
> > >
> > > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> > > [x] Does the software have a compatible license? Yes. Minor issue:
> > > Dual license in cmake/Modules/FindJeMalloc.cmake.
> > >
> > > [x] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE? Yes
> > > [x] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> Yes
> > >
> > > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> > > [x] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
> > > file?
> > > No. TVM NOTICE file hasn't been included.
> > >
> > > [x] Do all source files have ASF headers?
> > > Yes, except those in 3rdparty folder and those mentioned in license.
> > > [x] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
> > > control? Yes
> > > [x] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release? No
> > > [x] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear? Yes,
> Makefile
> > > is present and is straightforward.
> > > Is the issue minor? Yes
> > > Could it possibly be fixed in the next release? Yes
> > >
> > > I vote with:
> > > [x] +1 release the software
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2020/07/20 17:25:50, "Skalicky, Sam" <sskalic@amazon.com.INVALID>
> > > wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Tested:
> > > > - Make flow building from source, verified all example/extensions/*
> > work
> > > correctly
> > > > - staticbuild flow cpu & cu102 variants producing the pip wheels,
> > tested
> > > with custom extension library
> > > >
> > > > Sam
> > > >
> > > > ´╗┐On 7/20/20, 4:07 AM, "Chen, Ciyong" <ciyong.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >     CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
> Do
> > > not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender
> and
> > > know the content is safe.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     Thanks Aston, Patric for the vote.
> > > >
> > > >     Hi Community,
> > > >
> > > >     I would like to call for action to test/validate/vote for the
> > > release candidate (1.7.0.rc1).
> > > >     As we've not reached the quorum, I would like to extend the
> voting
> > > process to July 22, 23:59:59 PST.
> > > >     Please prepare your time and provide feedback if you've tried
> with
> > > the pre-released code base, thanks!
> > > >
> > > >     Best Regards,
> > > >     Ciyong
> > > >
> > > >     -----Original Message-----
> > > >     From: Zhao, Patric <patric.zhao@intel.com>
> > > >     Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 11:36 AM
> > > >     To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > >     Cc: dev@mxnet.apache.org; Bob Paulin <bob@apache.org>; Henri
> > > Yandell <bayard@apache.org>; Jason Dai <jasondai@apache.org>; Markus
> > > Weimer <weimer@apache.org>; Michael Wall <mjwall@apache.org>
> > > >     Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > > 1.7.0.rc1
> > > >
> > > >     +1
> > > >
> > > >     Passed the performance benchmarking for CPU tests and no
> regression
> > > is found.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     > -----Original Message-----
> > > >     > From: Aston Zhang <astonlzhang@gmail.com>
> > > >     > Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2020 1:45 PM
> > > >     > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > >     > Cc: dev@mxnet.apache.org; Bob Paulin <bob@apache.org>;
Henri
> > > Yandell
> > > >     > <bayard@apache.org>; Jason Dai <jasondai@apache.org>;
Markus
> > > Weimer
> > > >     > <weimer@apache.org>; Michael Wall <mjwall@apache.org>
> > > >     > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > > >     > 1.7.0.rc1
> > > >     >
> > > >     > +1
> > > >     > Passed d2l-en v0.14.1:
> > > >     > https://github.com/d2l-ai/d2l-en/releases/tag/v0.14.1
> > > >     >
> > > >     > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:34 AM Chen, Ciyong <
> > > ciyong.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >     >
> > > >     > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > >     > >
> > > >     > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> > > 1.7.0.
> > > >     > > Voting will start 16th July 23:59:59 PST and close on 19th
> July
> > > >     > > 23:59:59 PST.
> > > >     > >
> > > >     > > Link to release notes:
> > > >     > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.7.0+Release+note
> > > >     > > s
> > > >     > >
> > > >     > > Link to release candidate:
> > > >     > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.7.0.rc1
> > > >     > >
> > > >     > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> > > >     > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.7.0.rc1
> > > >     > >
> > > >     > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> > > >     > > +1 = approve
> > > >     > > +0 = no opinion
> > > >     > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > >     > >
> > > >     > > Here's the changes comparing to 1.7.0.rc0:
> > > >     > >
> > > >     > >   *   Revert "Fix memory leaks in Gluon (#18328) (#18358)
> > > (#18692)
> > > >     > >   *   revise activations (#18700)
> > > >     > >   *   Fix the monitor_callback invalid issue during
> calibration
> > > with
> > > >     > > variable input shapes (#18632) (#18703)
> > > >     > >
> > > >     > >
> > > >     > > Best regards,
> > > >     > > Ciyong Chen
> > > >     > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
> *+1 (973) 953-6299*
>
> [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image: https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat
> ]
> <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
> https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
> https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message