mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tianqi Chen <>
Subject Re: Severe legal issues with releases on
Date Sun, 10 May 2020 15:52:43 GMT
I agree, In the meanwhile. @Leonard I think we should ask trademark@apache
whether they would approve the use of

repo names: mxnet-cu80 mxnet-cu10 etc, given that
- they are distributed by individual contributors(as individuals and not as
ASF PPMC members),
- marked as thirdparty binary
- Build from the original ASF source with no modifications, while with an
"optional build config" that enables CUDA acceleration support, which
abides the rules in


On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:06 AM Markus Weimer <> wrote:

> On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 10:50 PM Tianqi Chen <>
> wrote:
> >
> > Seems the conclusion so far is only release source through apache and
> > release the binary builds as third party(as a different community, a
> > company or individual)
> Yes, that is the precedent established in multiple projects. I think
> it might still be worthwhile to pursue an exception from nvidia,
> though. Do we have any nvidia employees on the list that can inquire
> about that?
> Markus

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message