mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lanking <>
Subject Re: [apache/incubator-mxnet] [RFC] MXNet 2.0 JVM Language development (#17783)
Date Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:33:48 GMT
@szha For option 4, I would recommend to consume the JNA layer as a submodule from DJL. I am
not sure if this is recommendation serves as "add a dependency in mxnet".

There are two key reason that support for that:

1. DJL moves really fast and we can quickly change the JNA layer whenever in need. Comparing
to the merging speed in MXNet.

2. Consume as a submodule means MXNet community don't have to take care much on the maintainance.
DJL team will regularly provide Jar for MXNet user to consume.

We can also contribute code back in MXNet repo, since it is open source. But we may still
keep a copy in our repo for fast iteration. It may cause diverged version on JNA layer.

Overally speaking, my recommendation on option 4 leads towards a direction to consume DJL
JNA as a submodule.

You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 7-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message