mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc2
Date Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:06:54 GMT
When "fixing", please "fix" through actual root-cause analysis (use gdb,
for instance) and not simply by guesswork and cutting out things which
probably aren't actually at fault (blaming an OMP library that's in
worldwide distribution int he billions should be treated with great
skepticism).

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:44 AM Lin Yuan <apeforest@gmail.com> wrote:

> Pedro,
>
> While I agree with you we need to fix this usability issue, I don't think
> this is a release blocker as Przemek mentioned above. Could we fix this in
> the next minor release?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lin
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:38 AM Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Right. Would it be possible to have the CMake build also use libgomp for
> > consistency with the releases until these issues are resolved?
> > This can affect anyone compiling the distribution with CMake and also
> > happens randomly in CI, worsening the contributor experience due to CI
> > failures.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:33 AM Przemysław Trędak <ptrendx@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Pedro,
> > >
> > > From the issue that you linked it seems that you are using the LLVM
> > > OpenMP, whereas I believe the actual release uses libgomp (at least
> > that's
> > > what seems to be the conclusion from this issue:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/16891)?
> > >
> > > Przemek
> > >
> > > On 2020/02/04 03:42:30, Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > -1
> > > >
> > > > Unit tests passed in CPU build.
> > > >
> > > > I observe crashes related to openmp using cpp unit tests:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17043
> > > >
> > > > Pedro.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:44 PM Chaitanya Bapat <chai.bapat@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > > Successfully built MXNet 1.6.0rc2 on Linux
> > > > > Tested for OpPerf utility
> > > > > For CPU -
> > > > >
> https://gist.github.com/ChaiBapchya/d5ecc3e971c5a3c558d672477b4b6b9c
> > > > >
> > > > > Works well!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 15:43, Lin Yuan <apeforest@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tested Horovod with mnist example. My compiler flags are below:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [✔ CUDA, ✔ CUDNN, ✔ NCCL, ✔ CUDA_RTC, ✖ TENSORRT,
✔ CPU_SSE, ✔
> > > CPU_SSE2,
> > > > > ✔
> > > > > > CPU_SSE3, ✔ CPU_SSE4_1, ✔ CPU_SSE4_2, ✖ CPU_SSE4A, ✔
CPU_AVX, ✖
> > > > > CPU_AVX2, ✔
> > > > > > OPENMP, ✖ SSE, ✔ F16C, ✖ JEMALLOC, ✔ BLAS_OPEN, ✖
BLAS_ATLAS, ✖
> > > > > BLAS_MKL, ✖
> > > > > > BLAS_APPLE, ✔ LAPACK, ✖ MKLDNN, ✔ OPENCV, ✖ CAFFE, ✖
PROFILER, ✔
> > > > > > DIST_KVSTORE, ✖ CXX14, ✖ INT64_TENSOR_SIZE, ✖ SIGNAL_HANDLER,
✖
> > > DEBUG, ✖
> > > > > > TVM_OP]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 9:55 PM Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I tested below items:
> > > > > > > 1. download artifacts from Apache dist repo;
> > > > > > > 2. the signature looks good;
> > > > > > > 3. build from source code with MKL-DNN and MKL on centos;
> > > > > > > 4. run fp32 and int8 inference of ResNet50 under
> > > > > /example/quantization/.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > > > -tao
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 11:00 AM Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I see. I was looking at this page:
> > > > > > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 4:54 AM Przemysław Trędak
<
> > > ptrendx@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Tao,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Could you tell me where did you look for it and
did not find
> > > it? I
> > > > > > just
> > > > > > > >> checked and both
> > > > > > > >>
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc2/
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > >> draft of the release on GitHub have them.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thank you
> > > > > > > >> Przemek
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On 2020/02/01 14:23:11, Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > It seems the src tar and signature are missing
from the
> tag.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:09 AM Przemysław
Trędak <
> > > > > > > ptrendx@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet
(incubating)
> > > version
> > > > > > 1.6.0.
> > > > > > > >> > > Voting starts today and will close on
Monday 2/3/2020
> > 23:59
> > > PST.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Link to release notes:
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Link to release candidate:
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc2
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Link to source and signatures on apache
dist server:
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc2/
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > The differences comparing to previous
release candidate
> > > > > 1.6.0.rc1:
> > > > > > > >> > >  * Fixes for license issues (#17361,
#17375, #17370,
> > #17460)
> > > > > > > >> > >  * Bugfix for saving LSTM layer parameter
(#17288)
> > > > > > > >> > >  * Bugfix for downloading the model
from model zoo from
> > > multiple
> > > > > > > >> processes
> > > > > > > >> > > (#17372)
> > > > > > > >> > >  * Fixed a symbol.py in AMP for GluonNLP
(#17408)
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Please remember to TEST first before
voting accordingly:
> > > > > > > >> > > +1 = approve
> > > > > > > >> > > +0 = no opinion
> > > > > > > >> > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > >> > > Przemyslaw Tredak
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
> > > > > *+1 (973) 953-6299*
> > > > >
> > > > > [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > > > > <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
> > > https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat
> > > > > ]
> > > > > <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
> > > > > https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya
> > > >[image:
> > > > > https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > > > > <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message