mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lai Wei <roywei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.rc1
Date Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:55:53 GMT
+1
Build from source on Ubuntu with CUDA/CUDNN/MKLDNN and tested with
keras-mxnet.
Unit tests passed and example works on CPU/GPU.


Best Regards

Lai


On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:49 AM Lin Yuan <apeforest@gmail.com> wrote:

> Correction: it was built from source on Ubuntu 16.04
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:42 AM Lin Yuan <apeforest@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Build from source on Ubuntu 18 with CUDA/CUDNN/NCCL on and verified it
> > works with Horovod 0.18.2
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 9:55 AM Przemysław Trędak <ptrendx@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Dear MXNet community,
> >>
> >> This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.6.0.
> >> Voting starts today and will close on Friday 1/10/2020 23:59 PST.
> >>
> >> Link to release notes:
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.6.0+Release+notes
> >>
> >> Link to release candidate:
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.6.0.rc1
> >>
> >> Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.6.0.rc1/
> >>
> >> The differences comparing to previous release candidate 1.6.0.rc0:
> >> * Fix for RNN gradient calculation for MKLDNN ([v1.6.x] Cherry-pick
> >> MKL-DNN Rnn operator enhancements to v1.6.x (#17225))
> >> * Fix for Windows CMake build (Backport #16980 #17031 #17018 #17019 to
> >> 1.6 branch (#17213))
> >> * CPU counterpart to contrib multihead attention operators (Interleaved
> >> MHA for CPU path (#17138) (#17211))
> >> * Fix for #16060 (fix norm sparse fallback (#17149))
> >> * Fix for inconsistent names in estimator API (fix parameter names in
> the
> >> estimator api (#17051) (#17162))
> >> * Fixes for OpenMP (Backport 3rdparty/openmp fixes (#17193))
> >> * Fix for pointwise fusion speed for large networks (which was the
> reason
> >> of -1 in the vote for rc0) as well as fixes for nondeterminism in sum of
> >> squares operator and trainer parameter order (Backport #17002, #17068
> and
> >> #17114 to 1.6 branch (#17137))
> >>
> >>
> >> Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> >> +1 = approve
> >> +0 = no opinion
> >> -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Przemyslaw Tredak
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message