mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Zhao, Patric" <patric.z...@intel.com>
Subject RE: Proposal for MXNet website improving
Date Mon, 23 Dec 2019 05:43:37 GMT
From my view, performance is a big plus for MXNet and the reason why lots of people adopted
in MXNet.

I still think we need to have a top-level class for "performance".

Thanks,

--Patric 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chen, Ciyong <ciyong.chen@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 12:08 PM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Proposal for MXNet website improving
> 
> Hi Aaron,
> 
> Thanks for your valuable feedback.
> I'll prepare to contribute this change and PR soon, and update the contents
> as suggested.
> 
> Regarding making "Performance" a Key Feature to replace with "Tools &
> Libraries", anything I need to take care when removing "Tools & Libraries"
> part?
> 
> Thanks!
> -Ciyong
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Markham <aaron.s.markham@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2019 4:14 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Proposal for MXNet website improving
> 
> Hi Ciyong, thanks for the proposal.
> I like your suggestions. Will you be submitting a PR?
> 
> Some feedback:
> 
> * Regarding changing the URLs, let's avoid that. We just had a lot of work
> trying to fix broken links.
> * As far as changing the headings, sure, Tutorials and FAQs makes sense.
> * Adding performance as a nav item - my preference and going from UX
> guidelines, is to keep the number of them down to less than five or six.
>     - What about making performance a Key Feature and highlighting that on
> the main page? I'd switch it with Tools & Libraries since Ecosystem is the next
> thing below.
> 
> Cheers,
> Aaron
> 
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 2:03 AM Chen, Ciyong <ciyong.chen@intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi MXNet community,
> >
> > While doing search for MXNet from the official
> website[https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/], it's not that convenient to
> get the recent/latest performance data, besides there's some mismatch
> between the link and description in the current websites.
> > We can also add some new contents (like distributed training via Horovod,
> and AMP with bfloat16 data type) descriptions in FAQ section.
> >
> > So I propose to improve the current website structure from below 3
> > areas
> >
> > 1.        Add a new Tab "Performance" in the header, and change
> "Doc&Tutorials" to "Tutorials&FAQ" according to the current contents.
> >
> > 2.        Align description of FAQ section to the inner page.
> >
> > 3.        FAQ list adjustment
> >
> > Please check the details via below link
> >
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gQrC1V1LeJH5NT6zRqBl8Ub2qSr1dc8O
> >
> > Suggestions and comments are highly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -Ciyong
> >
Mime
View raw message