mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anirudh Acharya <anirudhk...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ONNX Support
Date Mon, 07 Oct 2019 19:45:36 GMT
Hi Chaitanya,

The last I checked( a couple of months back) there are a few
customers/users of MXNet in Amazon who use ONNX in production.

The last commit for ONNX module was on Aug 29th
- b7cca015553d707cd1c4ce292826d7311309419c

So IMO disabling any of the tests is not a good idea.


Thanks
Anirudh


On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 12:27 PM Chaitanya Bapat <chai.bapat@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello MXNet community,
>
> I wanted to know if MXNet should continue support for ONNX. Is there anyone
> actively working on MXNet ONNX or maintaining it?
>
> If not, can we skip/disable the ONNX tests from the CI.
> Reason - Whilst working on a Transpose operator PR [1], I encountered
> failure for ONNX [2]. Given operator passes rest of the CI pipeline tests.
> I am able to reproduce the error. However, the root cause for ONNX model
> failure couldn't be found. Moreover, there seems to be near zero activity
> as far as PR check-ins are concerned.
>
> How does ONNX fit in for MXNet going forward?
> Thank you
> Chai
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/16104
> [2]
>
> http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/mxnet-validation%2Funix-cpu/detail/PR-16104/14/pipeline
>
> --
> *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
> *+1 (973) 953-6299*
>
> [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image: https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat
> ]
> <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
> https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
> https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message