mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tao Lv <ta...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Discussion] MXNet 1.5.1 release
Date Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:54:58 GMT
Hi Aaron,

They were proposed to be ported to v1.5.x at the beginning of the
discussion but I didn't see any action for that. So I'm wondering if
they're still needed. I asked for that in the last update on 8/20 but
didn't get a response.

If they're still needed, I hope someone who is more familiar with Julia
frontend can help to cherry pick the commits to the v1.5.x branch.

thanks,
-tao

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:43 PM Aaron Markham <aaron.s.markham@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I don't see any request for action on the Julia PRs: 5 or 6.
> We didn't put the change in right away because we wanted it to not break
> anything. But the changes are needed to make Julia setup more seamless.
>
> What "update" is needed?
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019, 08:36 Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > @Pedro, seems the issue is still open on the master branch. Do you still
> > think we can have your fix on the 1.5.x branch?
> >
> > Progress since last update:
> > 1. We received several more proposals in the github thread [1]. I humbly
> > ask the reporters to pick the fixes to the v1.5.x. I will keep tracking
> the
> > progress and the healthy status of the release branch.
> > 2. Thanks to @Lai, the licence issue of julia cat image was fixed on the
> > master branch and I opened a PR to pick it to v1.5.x [2].
> > 3. The GPU OOM issue was fixed on the master branch by @Lin [3] . But
> there
> > is a problem with porting the fix to v1.5.x branch [4].
> >
> > Opens:
> > 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15803 still can not
> pass
> > the CI;
> > 2. Call for a update from julia folks about the back porting for [5] and
> > [6]
> > 3. License issue of cub and pybind is still open. @Lai opened a PR [7] to
> > update cub submodule but seems it need more effort than just commit id
> > update. I suspect that we cannot finish this work in 1.5.1 patch release.
> > 4. Still no progress for the sidebar issue on web page [8].
> > 5. Call for a conclusion about fixing the GPU OOM issue in 1.5.1
> >
> > Besides, I would like to ask if there is any preference for the release
> > timeline of 1.5.1 patch release? Please share so I can propose the time
> for
> > code freeze.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -tao
> >
> > [1]  https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15613.
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/16026
> > [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15948
> > [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15999
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15609
> > [6]  https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15608
> > [7] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15963
> > [8] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15200
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:50 AM Pedro Larroy <
> pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok. I was just asking if we want this fix in 1.5.1 since it addresses
> > > crashes using multiprocessing. The problem with cherry picking is that
> > the
> > > patch contains the dynamic load change which shouldn't impact anything
> > else
> > > but is not supposed to go in a release branch.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:19 PM Lin Yuan <apeforest@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15762  contains some
> > > > unrelated changes which is being reverted. Please do not cherry pick
> it
> > > > yet.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:25 PM Pedro Larroy <
> > > pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > There's a fix that I did which seems to still produce crashes in
> 1.5
> > > for
> > > > > some users, which I got notice today and is fixed in master.
> > > > >
> > > > > Might be useful to put in 1.5.1:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15762   ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Pedro.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:49 AM Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi dev,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here is an update for the 1.5.1 patch release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Thanks for the effort from whole community, we have cherry
> > picked
> > > a
> > > > > > bunch of fixes to v1.5.x branch. So far, the branch looks
> healthy:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/NightlyTestsForBinaries/activity/
> > > > > > 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15803 cannot
> > pass
> > > > the
> > > > > > CI;
> > > > > > 3. I hope julia folks can take a look at the back porting for
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15609 and
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15608 - do we
> still
> > > > need
> > > > > > them?
> > > > > > 4. License issue of cub and pybind is still not fixed. We also
> has
> > a
> > > > > > license issue of a cat image in julia examples.
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15542
> > > > > > 5. Still no progress for the sidebar issue:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15200
> > > > > > 6. There is a GPU OOM issue in 1.5.0 release and already root
> > caused
> > > by
> > > > > > Lin:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15703#issuecomment-522780492
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > We need decide whether we want to get it fixed in the 1.5.1
patch
> > > > > release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please find details in
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Plan+and+Status
> > > > > > .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > -tao
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:57 PM Zhao, Patric <
> > patric.zhao@intel.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the explanation, Marco & Tao. Sounds great!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 9:54 PM
> > > > > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Discussion] MXNet 1.5.1 release
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regarding the open issue, is there default code
> > > owner/maintainer?
> > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > so, he/she will be the right people to look into
the issue.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/CODEOWNERS
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have no idea. But the CODEOWNERS is used to receive
change
> > > > > > > notificaitons,
> > > > > > > > not actually indicates the maintainer of a piece of
code.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do we have regularly build, run, functionality and
> performance
> > > > > testing
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > this release?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As Marco mentioned, build, run and functionality of
v1.5.x
> > branch
> > > > are
> > > > > > > tracked
> > > > > > > > automatically by the CI for each cherry pick pull
request and
> > the
> > > > > > > nightly tests
> > > > > > > > here:
> > > > > > > > http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-
> > > > > > > >
> > > ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/NightlyTestsForBinaries/activity
> > > > .
> > > > > > > > I see it's healthy so far.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For performance, Shufan will track CPU performance
with his
> > test
> > > > > suite
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > send out the report once the branch is frozen. I'm
not sure
> if
> > > > there
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > other performance tests.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:36 PM Marco de Abreu
> > > > > > > > <marco.g.abreu@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Patric,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > CI should automatically pick up the branch and
validate it
> as
> > > > > usual.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > Marco
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Zhao, Patric <patric.zhao@intel.com> schrieb
am Mo., 12.
> > Aug.
> > > > > 2019,
> > > > > > > 15:22:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It's great works, Tao 😊
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regarding the open issue, is there default
code
> > > > owner/maintainer?
> > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > > so, he/she will be the right people to look
into the
> issue.
> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-
> > > > > > > > mxnet/blob/master/CODEOWNERS
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Do we have regularly build, run, functionality
and
> > > performance
> > > > > > > > > > testing
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > this release?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --Patric
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 8:59
PM
> > > > > > > > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Discussion] MXNet 1.5.1
release
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Update:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > We're cherry picking fixes from the
master to the
> v1.5.x
> > > > > branch.
> > > > > > > > > > > Some
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > them are already merged. Please find
details on the
> cwiki
> > > > page:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Pl
> > > > > > > > > > > an+a
> > > > > > > > > > > nd+Status
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >  There are still 3 opens:
> > > > > > > > > > > 1. Nightly test failure on CI (
> > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15374
> ):
> > > The
> > > > > > issue
> > > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > > > > open. I'm wondering if it has been
fixed or not. If
> not,
> > is
> > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > anyone
> > > > > > > > > > > working on it?
> > > > > > > > > > > 2. Broken Sidebar on website API for
master and 1.5.0 (
> > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15200
> ):
> > I
> > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > progress on this issue? Do we still
want to include it
> > into
> > > > > 1.5.1
> > > > > > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > > > release?
> > > > > > > > > > > 3. License issues need to be fixed
before 1.6 release (
> > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15542
> ):
> > > > > > Currently
> > > > > > > > > > > the license issue for code and images
is partially
> fixed
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > master
> > > > > > > > > > branch and
> > > > > > > > > > > will be picked to v1.5.x soon. MKLML
license issue is
> > > pushed
> > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > > > to 1.6 release. But license issue for
cub and pybind is
> > > still
> > > > > > open.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if you any suggestion.
Thanks for your
> > support!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -tao
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:03 PM Tao
Lv <
> taolv@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Update:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to wkcn's report, Issue
#15774 [1] and the fix
> > > > #15751
> > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > > > > > are added to the scope of 1.5.1
patch release.
> > > > > > > > > > > > For issue #15703 [3], I'm still
waiting from the
> > response
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > the reporter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Issue #15431 [4] was closed as
false positive report.
> > > > > > > > > > > > I also included several MKL-DNN
backend issues
> reported
> > > by
> > > > > > mxnet
> > > > > > > > > users
> > > > > > > > > > > > and downstream projects. They
are already fixed on
> the
> > > > master
> > > > > > > > branch.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Please kindly check the full list
of issues need be
> > > > included
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1.5.1 patch release:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Pl
> > > > > > > > > > > an+a
> > > > > > > > > > > > nd+Status
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > For issues which are already fixed
on the master
> > branch,
> > > we
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > > start
> > > > > > > > > > > > to cherry pick the fix commit
to the v1.5.x branch.
> For
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > > > > > > > which are still open, we will
start to track the fix
> > > > process.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your great support.
Let me know if you
> have
> > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > > questions or concerns.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -tao
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15774
> > > > > > > > > > > > [2]
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15751
> > > > > > > > > > > > [3]
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15703
> > > > > > > > > > > > [4]
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15431
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:04 PM
Tao Lv <
> > taolv@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Per Sam's proposal [1], Issue
#15737 [2] and the fix
> > [3]
> > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > >> added
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > >> the scope of 1.5.1 patch release.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> A friendly reminder: the issue
proposing will be
> > closed
> > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > > > >> 11pm
> > > > > > > > > > > >> 8/7 CST (8am 8/7 PST). After
that, we will start to
> > > cherry
> > > > > > pick
> > > > > > > > > fixes
> > > > > > > > > > > >> to the v1.5.x branch.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-
> > > > > > > > > > > mxnet/issues/15613#issuecomment-5
> > > > > > > > > > > >> 18430120 [2]
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15737
> > > > > > > > > > > >> [3]
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15692
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 4:24
PM Tao Lv <
> > taolv@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Hi Sandeep/Lai,
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> Thank you for the prompt
response!
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15200
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> added
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> the list to track the
sidebar issue.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at
7:54 AM sandeep
> krishnamurthy
> > <
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> sandeep.krishna98@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thank you Tao and
Shufan.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Sidebar missing bug
in API documentation is
> > > > inconvenience
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> the
> > > > > > > > > > user.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> It
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> would great if we
can fix it with 1.5.1
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019,
10:14 AM Lai Wei <
> > > > > royweilai@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > Hi Tao,
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > Thank you so
much for driving it.  Currently
> > nightly
> > > > > test
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > on
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> tutorials are
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > failing and it
need to be fixed. [3] I have
> > updated
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > issue[1] and
cwiki.[2]
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > [1]
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15613
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > [2]
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Pl
> > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> n+and+Status
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > [3]
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15374
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > Best Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > Lai
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > On Wed, Jul 31,
2019 at 8:04 AM Tao Lv <
> > > > > taolv@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >  Hi community,
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Thanks for
the initiative from Sam
> > > > (samskalicky@github
> > > > > > ),
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > we already
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > have a
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > discussion
thread [1] on github about the
> > defects
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > bugs exposed
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> in the
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > 1.5.0 release.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Shufan (juliusshufan@github)
and I
> > (TaoLv@github)
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > like
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> manage
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > the
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > release
of 1.5.1. This will be our first debut
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > release
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> process,
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > your
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > comments
are always valuable.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Per the
SemVer 2.0 [2], MXNet 1.5.1 will be a
> > > patch
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > release
which
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > contains
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > backwards-compatible
fixes only.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > I have created
a page on cwiki [3] to track
> the
> > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > process
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> moved
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > the issues
and PRs mentioned in the github
> > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > thread
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> page.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > Here I would
like to ask the community to:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > (1) Raise
any other defect or regression you
> > > > > identified
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > in the
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > 1.5.0 release.
Please file a github issue for
> it
> > > and
> > > > > > note
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > the issue
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> number in
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > this thread;
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > (2) Please
comment with one sentence for why
> you
> > > > think
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > the issue
is critical and must have in the
> 1.5.1
> > > > > > release;
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > (3) If the
issue is already fixed on master
> > branch
> > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > already
have
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> a PR
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > WIP, please
also note the fix commit id or PR
> > > > number;
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > (4) If the
issue is still open and there is no
> > PR
> > > > WIP,
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > please
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> indicate
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > whether
you'd be willing to help it out;
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > (5) Feel
free to comment if any other
> suggestion
> > > for
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > I suggest
to keep this thread open for one
> week
> > to
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > collect
enough information and proposals
> before
> > we
> > > > > > decide
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > the timeline
for the
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> release.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > So
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > your timely
response will be highly
> appreciated!
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > PS: Sorry
to say that even as a committer,
> this
> > is
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > first time
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> for me
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > to
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > manage a
release. So it would be great if an
> > > > > experienced
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > committer
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> can
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > help
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > to guide
the process.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > -tao
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > [1]
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15613
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > [2] https://semver.org/
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > [3]
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Pl
> > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> n+and+Status
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message