mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lin Yuan <apefor...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Discussion] MXNet 1.5.1 release
Date Tue, 27 Aug 2019 20:19:24 GMT
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15762  contains some
unrelated changes which is being reverted. Please do not cherry pick it yet.

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:25 PM Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com>
wrote:

> There's a fix that I did which seems to still produce crashes in 1.5 for
> some users, which I got notice today and is fixed in master.
>
> Might be useful to put in 1.5.1:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15762   ?
>
> Pedro.
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:49 AM Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi dev,
> >
> > Here is an update for the 1.5.1 patch release.
> >
> > 1. Thanks for the effort from whole community, we have cherry picked a
> > bunch of fixes to v1.5.x branch. So far, the branch looks healthy:
> >
> >
> http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/NightlyTestsForBinaries/activity/
> > 2. https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15803 cannot pass the
> > CI;
> > 3. I hope julia folks can take a look at the back porting for
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15609 and
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15608 - do we still need
> > them?
> > 4. License issue of cub and pybind is still not fixed. We also has a
> > license issue of a cat image in julia examples.
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15542
> > 5. Still no progress for the sidebar issue:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15200
> > 6. There is a GPU OOM issue in 1.5.0 release and already root caused by
> > Lin:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15703#issuecomment-522780492
> > .
> > We need decide whether we want to get it fixed in the 1.5.1 patch
> release.
> >
> > Please find details in
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Plan+and+Status
> > .
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -tao
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:57 PM Zhao, Patric <patric.zhao@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the explanation, Marco & Tao. Sounds great!
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 9:54 PM
> > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Discussion] MXNet 1.5.1 release
> > > >
> > > > > Regarding the open issue, is there default code owner/maintainer?
> If
> > > > > so, he/she will be the right people to look into the issue.
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/CODEOWNERS
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have no idea. But the CODEOWNERS is used to receive change
> > > notificaitons,
> > > > not actually indicates the maintainer of a piece of code.
> > > >
> > > > Do we have regularly build, run, functionality and performance
> testing
> > > for
> > > > > this release?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As Marco mentioned, build, run and functionality of v1.5.x branch are
> > > tracked
> > > > automatically by the CI for each cherry pick pull request and the
> > > nightly tests
> > > > here:
> > > > http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-
> > > > ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/NightlyTestsForBinaries/activity.
> > > > I see it's healthy so far.
> > > >
> > > > For performance, Shufan will track CPU performance with his test
> suite
> > > and
> > > > send out the report once the branch is frozen. I'm not sure if there
> > are
> > > any
> > > > other performance tests.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:36 PM Marco de Abreu
> > > > <marco.g.abreu@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Patric,
> > > > >
> > > > > CI should automatically pick up the branch and validate it as
> usual.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Marco
> > > > >
> > > > > Zhao, Patric <patric.zhao@intel.com> schrieb am Mo., 12. Aug.
> 2019,
> > > 15:22:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It's great works, Tao 😊
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regarding the open issue, is there default code owner/maintainer?
> > If
> > > > > > so, he/she will be the right people to look into the issue.
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-
> > > > mxnet/blob/master/CODEOWNERS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do we have regularly build, run, functionality and performance
> > > > > > testing
> > > > > for
> > > > > > this release?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --Patric
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org>
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 8:59 PM
> > > > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Discussion] MXNet 1.5.1 release
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Update:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We're cherry picking fixes from the master to the v1.5.x
> branch.
> > > > > > > Some
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > them are already merged. Please find details on the cwiki
page:
> > > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Pl
> > > > > > > an+a
> > > > > > > nd+Status
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  There are still 3 opens:
> > > > > > > 1. Nightly test failure on CI (
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15374):
The
> > issue
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > still
> > > > > > > open. I'm wondering if it has been fixed or not. If not,
is
> there
> > > > > anyone
> > > > > > > working on it?
> > > > > > > 2. Broken Sidebar on website API for master and 1.5.0 (
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15200):
I
> don't
> > > > > > > see
> > > > > any
> > > > > > > progress on this issue? Do we still want to include it
into
> 1.5.1
> > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > release?
> > > > > > > 3. License issues need to be fixed before 1.6 release (
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15542):
> > Currently
> > > > > > > the license issue for code and images is partially fixed
on the
> > > > > > > master
> > > > > > branch and
> > > > > > > will be picked to v1.5.x soon. MKLML license issue is pushed
> out
> > > > > > > to 1.6 release. But license issue for cub and pybind is
still
> > open.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let me know if you any suggestion. Thanks for your support!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -tao
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:03 PM Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Update:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks to wkcn's report, Issue #15774 [1] and the
fix #15751
> > [2]
> > > > > > > > are added to the scope of 1.5.1 patch release.
> > > > > > > > For issue #15703 [3], I'm still waiting from the response
> from
> > > > > > > > the reporter.
> > > > > > > > Issue #15431 [4] was closed as false positive report.
> > > > > > > > I also included several MKL-DNN backend issues reported
by
> > mxnet
> > > > > users
> > > > > > > > and downstream projects. They are already fixed on
the master
> > > > branch.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please kindly check the full list of issues need be
included
> in
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > 1.5.1 patch release:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Pl
> > > > > > > an+a
> > > > > > > > nd+Status
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For issues which are already fixed on the master branch,
we
> > will
> > > > > start
> > > > > > > > to cherry pick the fix commit to the v1.5.x branch.
For
> issues
> > > > > > > > which are still open, we will start to track the fix
process.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for your great support. Let me know if you
have any
> > > > > > > > questions or concerns.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -tao
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15774
> > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15751
> > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15703
> > > > > > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15431
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:04 PM Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Per Sam's proposal [1], Issue #15737 [2] and the
fix [3] are
> > > > > > > >> added
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > >> the scope of 1.5.1 patch release.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> A friendly reminder: the issue proposing will
be closed
> before
> > > > > > > >> 11pm
> > > > > > > >> 8/7 CST (8am 8/7 PST). After that, we will start
to cherry
> > pick
> > > > > fixes
> > > > > > > >> to the v1.5.x branch.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-
> > > > > > > mxnet/issues/15613#issuecomment-5
> > > > > > > >> 18430120 [2]
> > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15737
> > > > > > > >> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15692
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 4:24 PM Tao Lv <taolv@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> Hi Sandeep/Lai,
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Thank you for the prompt response!
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15200
 is
> > > > > > > >>> added
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>> the list to track the sidebar issue.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 7:54 AM sandeep krishnamurthy
<
> > > > > > > >>> sandeep.krishna98@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Thank you Tao and Shufan.
> > > > > > > >>>> Sidebar missing bug in API documentation
is inconvenience
> > for
> > > > > > > >>>> the
> > > > > > user.
> > > > > > > >>>> It
> > > > > > > >>>> would great if we can fix it with 1.5.1
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019, 10:14 AM Lai Wei
<
> royweilai@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> > Hi Tao,
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>> > Thank you so much for driving it.
 Currently nightly
> test
> > > > > > > >>>> > on
> > > > > > > >>>> tutorials are
> > > > > > > >>>> > failing and it need to be fixed.
[3] I have updated the
> > > > > > > >>>> > issue[1] and cwiki.[2]
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>> > [1]
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15613
> > > > > > > >>>> > [2]
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Pl
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > >>>> n+and+Status
> > > > > > > >>>> > [3]
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15374
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>> > Best Regards
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>> > Lai
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:04 AM Tao
Lv <
> taolv@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >  Hi community,
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > Thanks for the initiative from
Sam (samskalicky@github
> > ),
> > > > > > > >>>> > > we already
> > > > > > > >>>> > have a
> > > > > > > >>>> > > discussion thread [1] on github
about the defects and
> > > > > > > >>>> > > bugs exposed
> > > > > > > >>>> in the
> > > > > > > >>>> > > 1.5.0 release.
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > Shufan (juliusshufan@github)
and I (TaoLv@github)
> would
> > > > > > > >>>> > > like
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>>> manage
> > > > > > > >>>> > the
> > > > > > > >>>> > > release of 1.5.1. This will
be our first debut on the
> > > > > > > >>>> > > release
> > > > > > > >>>> process,
> > > > > > > >>>> > your
> > > > > > > >>>> > > comments are always valuable.
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > Per the SemVer 2.0 [2], MXNet
1.5.1 will be a patch
> > > > > > > >>>> > > release which
> > > > > > > >>>> > contains
> > > > > > > >>>> > > backwards-compatible fixes only.
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > I have created a page on cwiki
[3] to track the
> release
> > > > > process
> > > > > > > >>>> > > and
> > > > > > > >>>> moved
> > > > > > > >>>> > > the issues and PRs mentioned
in the github discussion
> > > > > > > >>>> > > thread
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>>> > > the
> > > > > > > >>>> page.
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > Here I would like to ask the
community to:
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > (1) Raise any other defect or
regression you
> identified
> > > > > > > >>>> > > in the
> > > > > > > >>>> > > 1.5.0 release. Please file a
github issue for it and
> > note
> > > > > > > >>>> > > the issue
> > > > > > > >>>> number in
> > > > > > > >>>> > > this thread;
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > (2) Please comment with one
sentence for why you think
> > > > > > > >>>> > > the issue is critical and must
have in the 1.5.1
> > release;
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > (3) If the issue is already
fixed on master branch or
> > > > > > > >>>> > > already have
> > > > > > > >>>> a PR
> > > > > > > >>>> > > WIP, please also note the fix
commit id or PR number;
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > (4) If the issue is still open
and there is no PR WIP,
> > > > > > > >>>> > > please
> > > > > > > >>>> indicate
> > > > > > > >>>> > > whether you'd be willing to
help it out;
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > (5) Feel free to comment if
any other suggestion for
> the
> > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > I suggest to keep this thread
open for one week to
> > > > > > > >>>> > > collect enough information and
proposals before we
> > decide
> > > > > > > >>>> > > the timeline for the
> > > > > > > >>>> release.
> > > > > > > >>>> > So
> > > > > > > >>>> > > your timely response will be
highly appreciated!
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > PS: Sorry to say that even as
a committer, this is the
> > > > > > > >>>> > > first time
> > > > > > > >>>> for me
> > > > > > > >>>> > to
> > > > > > > >>>> > > manage a release. So it would
be great if an
> experienced
> > > > > > > >>>> > > committer
> > > > > > > >>>> can
> > > > > > > >>>> > help
> > > > > > > >>>> > > to guide the process.
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > -tao
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > [1]
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/15613
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > [2] https://semver.org/
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > > [3]
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.5.1+Release+Pl
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > >>>> n+and+Status
> > > > > > > >>>> > >
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message