mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Markham <aaron.s.mark...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CUDA recommendation
Date Sat, 25 May 2019 00:52:17 GMT
Sounds like we need an * near the CUDA 10.1 recommendation if there
are known performance issues. Is there a particular issue # tracking
the performance issues?
I'm seeing a CUDA 10 Windows issue here that seems unresolved:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/14479

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:00 PM Sheng Zha <zhasheng@apache.org> wrote:
>
> 10.1 is recommended. The oldest CUDA version that we release is 8.0.
>
> -sz
>
> On 2019/05/24 23:29:38, Marco de Abreu <marco.g.abreu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > While we are at the topic, did we actually agree on dropping support for
> > some versions? So far we are releasing all the way been to cuda 7.5 I think
> >
> > -Marco
> >
> > Skalicky, Sam <sskalic@amazon.com.invalid> schrieb am Fr., 24. Mai 2019,
> > 23:43:
> >
> > > Hi Aaron
> > >
> > > Right now, the most stable version is CUDA 9.2. CUDA 10 is supported and
> > > some pip wheels are available, but there are known performance issues. And
> > > we are quickly moving to CUDA 10.1. So things are still in flux now. I
> > > think the best approach would be to wait a couple more weeks before
> > > updating this part of the docs.
> > >
> > > Sam
> > >
> > >
> > > > On May 24, 2019, at 2:09 PM, Aaron Markham <aaron.s.markham@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What version of CUDA is currently recommended?
> > > > Now that there are packages for CUDA 10, shouldn't the build from
> > > > source (and other) documentation reflect the latest greatest
> > > > combinations?
> > > >
> > > > Specifically the Ubuntu guide [1] states: "CUDA 9.2 is recommended."
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/versions/master/install/ubuntu_setup.html#cuda-dependencies
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Aaron
> > >
> > >
> >

Mime
View raw message