mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From kellen sunderland <kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status
Date Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:20 GMT
Sounds good Steffen.  I believe most of these PRs only fix functional
problems (they don't add features) and should be fairly low risk.

Update from my side:
13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <- Already
merged, thanks Haibin!

Ready for review / merge with all tests passed:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13898
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13900
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13897

-Kellen

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:06 PM Steffen Rochel <steffenrochel@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Kellen - thanks, please go ahead. I'm ok as long we avoid risky PR and can
> get to a stable and tested build by Friday.
>
> Best,
> Steffen
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:48 PM kellen sunderland <
> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Many thanks for the license fixes and allowing some other PRs to come
> into
> > the release.
> >
> > For #13697 I've contacted the author Zhennan and let him know he can cut
> a
> > branch to v1.4.x to update any APIs that are required.
> >
> > For the other PRs listed here's some new PRs for the v1.4.x branch.
> > 13188: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13898
> > 13727: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13900
> > 13695: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13899 <- Already
> > merged, thanks Haibin!
> >
> > I'd also propose that we include this TensorRT PR which fixes inference
> > bugs and updates to a more stable commit of onnx-trt:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13897
> >
> > -Kellen
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:57 PM Steffen Rochel <steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Lin - please go ahead to integrate into 1.4.x.
> > > Steffen
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:17 PM Lin Yuan <apeforest@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Steffen,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to ask to include one more PR for 1.4.0.rc1:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13845
> > > >
> > > > This PR exports exception handling API of MXNet. It is needed by
> > Horovod
> > > > with MXNet integration to elegantly throw exception at Python level
> > > rather
> > > > than a C++ abort.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Lin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 2:24 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dear MXNet community -
> > > > > Zach & friends made good progress resolving the licensing issues.
> One
> > > > more
> > > > > PR on 1.4.x branch is expected today.
> > > > > The code freeze for 1.4.0.rc1 is Thursday Jan 17th 6pm PST.
> > > > > I'm asking the requester to add following PR to 1.4.x branch:
> > > > > Tao:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13882
> > > > > Kellen:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13697
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13188
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13727
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13695
> > > > > Pedro:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13535
> > > > >
> > > > > If there are additional PR to be considered for 1.4.0.rc1 please
> send
> > > > > request to dev@.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Steffen
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:28 AM Qing Lan <lanking520@live.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I added a section F in the document that explained the current
> > > > > > static-linked dependencies we used for official release. As
there
> > > are a
> > > > > few
> > > > > > licenses are under BSD3 and GPL, we need to handle them in our
> next
> > > > > > release. Please take a look and leave any concerns you may have.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Qing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 1/7/19, 8:33 PM, "kellen sunderland" <
> > > kellen.sunderland@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     So I see two quick options that should cut down on the
> > dependency
> > > > > > licenses
> > > > > >     required for TRT in the source release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     1: We can simply remove in the release package the submodules
> > for
> > > > > onnx
> > > > > > in
> > > > > >     folder
> > > > > >
> > incubator-mxnet/3rdparty/onnx-tensorrt/third_party/onnx/third_party.
> > > > > >     None of those dependencies are used in the build (I've just
> > > > verified
> > > > > >     locally on my machine).
> > > > > >     2: We can make a cmake based checkout system and ensure
we
> only
> > > > > > checkout
> > > > > >     the required files when TRT builds are enabled (similar
to
> the
> > > > > current
> > > > > >     mkl-ml setup).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     I'd suggest option 1 for this release, and that we support
> > > option 2
> > > > > > for the
> > > > > >     1.5 release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:19 PM Lv, Tao A <tao.a.lv@intel.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     > What should I do for the double headers in
> > > > > > 3rdparty/mkldnn/src/cpu/xbyak/?
> > > > > >     >
> > > > > >     > -tao
> > > > > >     >
> > > > > >     > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > >     > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenrochel@gmail.com]
> > > > > >     > Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51 AM
> > > > > >     > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > >     > Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status
> > > > > >     >
> > > > > >     > Kellen and Tao -
> > > > > >     > yes, the understanding is that dependencies need to
be
> > > considered
> > > > > > and all
> > > > > >     > licences referenced to include in top level LICENSE
file.
> > > > > >     > Appreciate your help with it.
> > > > > >     > Steffen
> > > > > >     >
> > > > > >     > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:39 PM kellen sunderland <
> > > > > >     > kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >     >
> > > > > >     > > Sorry to hear about the licensing issues.  I was
> following
> > > the
> > > > > > general
> > > > > >     > > vote but I'm still lacking some clarity around
what
> > licenses
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > >     > > onnx-trt repo need to be surfaced.  I believe
onnx-trt is
> > MIT
> > > > > >     > > licensed, but it includes Onnx as a third party
repo
> which
> > > then
> > > > > > brings
> > > > > >     > > in dependencies with a variety of licenses.  The
proposal
> > is
> > > > that
> > > > > > we
> > > > > >     > > look at these on an individual basis and then
add them to
> > our
> > > > top
> > > > > > level
> > > > > >     > LICENSE file right?
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >     > > An alternative is that we may be able to checkout
a
> smaller
> > > > > source
> > > > > >     > > code dependency tree if we remove a few unneeded
ONNX's
> > > > > > dependencies
> > > > > >     > > (pybind and google-bench).  My hope is that this
wouldn't
> > > > affect
> > > > > > our
> > > > > >     > > compilation process and would get us down to two
licenses
> > to
> > > > > report
> > > > > >     > > (just Onnx and Onnx-TRT, both MIT).
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >     > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:07 PM Meghna Baijal
> > > > > >     > > <meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com>
> > > > > >     > > wrote:
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >     > > > Hi All,
> > > > > >     > > > For some more context, these were the last
emails I
> sent
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > dev
> > > > > >     > > > and legal lists requesting help on the open
questions
> –
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > > > 1. Question on legal about the CC-By-2.5
<
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201805.mbox
> > > > > >     > > /%3CCAK1xzDe6ECToKt_2cTR_7txQQCwHeYfvxXDfmuGgfA3jaTs=
> > > > > > Jw@mail.gmail.com
> > > > > >     > > %3E
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > 2. Question on dev about googletest file
<
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201804.mbox/%3CCAMG
> > > > > >     > > gKDC8szdfFqQhhSNpwwT_3zi4LBS7A=
> > > u4v7KJ4ULE44u3cQ@mail.gmail.com
> > > > > %3E
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > 3. General Request for review of the licenses
wiki <
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201801.mbox/%3CCAM
> > > > > >     > > GgKDCi=s933zcVWwei15i5uBC1h88VUogt3Br=Vq28=
> > > > vi65g@mail.gmail.com
> > > > > %3E
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > > >  (Note: You can click on the the “>>”
next to the
> thread
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > top
> > > > > >     > > > right to view the next responses in the email
threads
> in
> > > the
> > > > > > apache
> > > > > >     > > > archive. )
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >     > > > Meghna Baijal
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:30 PM Steffen Rochel
> > > > > >     > > > <steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> > > > > >     > > > wrote:
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > Dear MXNet community -
> > > > > >     > > > > as you should have seen in previous
email, voting for
> > > > > > v1.4.0.rc0
> > > > > >     > > > > has
> > > > > >     > > been
> > > > > >     > > > > cancelled. We received a -1 vote due
to outstanding
> > > license
> > > > > > issues.
> > > > > >     > > > > Please help to update
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+License
> > > > > >     > > s
> > > > > >     > > > > and
> > > > > >     > > > > resolve outstanding issues.
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > I would like to ask specifically for
help from
> > > contributors
> > > > > to
> > > > > >     > > > > mkldnn, opemmp and onnx-tensorrt to
address the
> > feedback
> > > > from
> > > > > >     > > > > Justin - see
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ebb8c4c00fb66dd98da13621c7dcb8753
> > > > > >     > > fee57562a861d61379d31e9@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org
> %3E
> > > > > >     > > > > .
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > I suggest to fix the issues first on
master, then
> > > > cherry-pick
> > > > > > and
> > > > > >     > > > > merge
> > > > > >     > > > to
> > > > > >     > > > > 1.4.x branch.
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude Julia from
1.4.0 release as
> > > > > > integration
> > > > > >     > > > > into MXNet repo and upgrade to 0.7+
is WIP.
> > > > > >     > > > > I'm suggesting to exclude googletest/googlemock
from
> > > 1.4.0
> > > > > > release
> > > > > >     > > > > as outstanind license issues are not
resolved yet.
> This
> > > > > should
> > > > > > not
> > > > > >     > > > > impact users.
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > Please provide your feedback to the
suggestions.
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >     > > > > Steffen
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM Steffen
Rochel <
> > > > > >     > > steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> > > > > >     > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > > Dear MXNet community -
> > > > > >     > > > > > I hope you have seen that voting
for v1.4.0.rc0 has
> > > > started
> > > > > > and
> > > > > >     > > > > > will continue until December 27th
noon. So far two
> > > > binding
> > > > > +1
> > > > > >     > votes.
> > > > > >     > > > > > I suggesting the following schedule
to account for
> > > > holidays
> > > > > > and
> > > > > >     > > > > > of
> > > > > >     > > > course
> > > > > >     > > > > > depending on voting feedback.
> > > > > >     > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > > Vote on dev@ until 12/27
> > > > > >     > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > > Vote on general@ 12/28 – 1/3
> > > > > >     > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > > Release announcement with pre-build
language
> bindings
> > > 1/9
> > > > > >     > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > > Please let me know if you have
concerns with the
> > > proposed
> > > > > > schedule.
> > > > > >     > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >     > > > > > Steffen
> > > > > >     > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM
Haibin Lin <
> > > > > >     > > haibin.lin.aws@gmail.com>
> > > > > >     > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >     > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> Hi Steffen,
> > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> Aston and I would like to bring
this PR to your
> > > > attention:
> > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13686,
> > > > > > where Zhi
> > > > > >     > > fixed
> > > > > >     > > > > the
> > > > > >     > > > > >> num_worker argument of DataLoader
on windows.
> > Without
> > > > this
> > > > > > fix,
> > > > > >     > > using
> > > > > >     > > > > >> DataLoader with num_worker
> 0 would result in
> crash
> > > on
> > > > > > Windows.
> > > > > >     > > > > Bringing
> > > > > >     > > > > >> this PR to 1.4.x would greatly
benefit windows
> users
> > > of
> > > > > > MXNet.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> Aston
> > > > > >     > > > is
> > > > > >     > > > > >> working on the dive into deep
learning book
> > > > > >     > > > > >> <http://diveintodeeplearning.org>
based on MXNet,
> > > which
> > > > > is
> > > > > > due
> > > > > >     > > > > >> and
> > > > > >     > > > > frozen
> > > > > >     > > > > >> for publication next week.
Currently the book will
> > > > depend
> > > > > on
> > > > > >     > > > > >> MXNet
> > > > > >     > > > 1.4.0
> > > > > >     > > > > >> and discourages readers from
using multi-worker
> > > > > DataLoaders
> > > > > > due
> > > > > >     > > > > >> to
> > > > > >     > > > this
> > > > > >     > > > > >> bug
> > > > > >     > > > > >> on Windows. With this fix Aston
can update the
> > > examples
> > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > >     > > > > >> book
> > > > > >     > > > with
> > > > > >     > > > > >> DataLoader using multiple workers,
which will be
> > very
> > > > > >     > > > > >> beneficial to
> > > > > >     > > > the
> > > > > >     > > > > >> broader MXNet community.
> > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > >     > > > > >> Haibin
> > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:11
AM Pedro Larroy <
> > > > > >     > > > > >> pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > Hi Steffen
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > Added some notes in your
PR for the release
> notes.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > In particular, I'm a bit
concerned about the
> > status
> > > of
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > topology
> > > > > >     > > > aware
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > communication, since it
has open issues and is
> not
> > > > being
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > tested in
> > > > > >     > > > CI.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > (The tests also fail).
I think we should anounce
> > it
> > > > when
> > > > > > it's
> > > > > >     > > > working
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > properly and it's well
tested.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > Pedro.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at
11:06 AM Steffen Rochel
> <
> > > > > >     > > > > >> steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Dear MXNet community
-
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > all issues beside
one
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > <
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/13438
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > have
> > > > > >     > > > been
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > addressed. I suggest
to document the last
> > > remaining
> > > > > > issue
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > as
> > > > > >     > > known
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > problem
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > and move forward
with the release.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Please communicate
if you have concerns of
> know
> > > > about
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > critical
> > > > > >     > > > > issues
> > > > > >     > > > > >> to
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > be
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > addressed before
starting vote about releasing
> > > 1.4.0
> > > > > as
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > soon as
> > > > > >     > > > > >> possible.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Please also have
a look at the release notes <
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incu
> > > > > >     > > bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > and provide feedback.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > I'm planing to start
voting beginning of next
> > > week.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > Steffen
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018
at 8:31 PM Steffen Rochel
> <
> > > > > >     > > > > >> steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > Hi Pedro - this
are indeed the draft release
> > > notes
> > > > > for
> > > > > >     > v1.4.0.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> Please
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > add
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > description
as you suggested.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > All - please
have a look at the release
> notes
> > > and
> > > > > > provide
> > > > > >     > > > feedback
> > > > > >     > > > > >> and
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > suggestions..
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > Steffen
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec
9, 2018 at 3:30 AM Zhao, Patric
> <
> > > > > >     > > > > patric.zhao@intel.com>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Hi Steffen,
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> I saw the
draft of 1.4 release notes in
> here
> > (
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incu
> > > > > >     > > bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> ).
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Is this
near the final version?  I'd like
> to
> > > add
> > > > > some
> > > > > >     > > > > descriptions
> > > > > >     > > > > >> of
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > new
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> quantization
features enabled in 1.4.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Is it OK?
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> --Patric
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > -----Original
Message-----
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > From:
Steffen Rochel [mailto:
> > > > > > steffenrochel@gmail.com]
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Sent:
Saturday, December 8, 2018 1:12 AM
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > To:
dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Subject:
Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release
> status
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Dear
MXNet community - I would like to
> > > provide
> > > > > > update
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > on
v1.4.0 status, details
> > > > > >     > > are
> > > > > >     > > > > >> tracked
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> here
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > <
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > .
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Thank
you very much for everybody effort
> to
> > > > > resolve
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > the
> > > > > >     > > > > >> identified
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> issues.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > We
are down to 3 open issues - for
> details
> > > > please
> > > > > > see
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28in
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > cubating%29+1.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > 4.0
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >
> > +Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.4.0ReleasePlanandS
> > > > > >     > > > +Release+Plan+and+t
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > atu
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > +Release+Plan+and+s-OpenPRstotrack
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > <
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > > > > >     >
> > > > >
> ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > 4.0ReleasePlanandStatus-OpenPRstotrack>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Please
help to resolve the remaining
> issues
> > > and
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > integrate
> > > > > >     > > to
> > > > > >     > > > > >> v1.4.x
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> branch.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Current
estimate to address the
> identified
> > > > > security
> > > > > >     > > > > >> vulnerabilities
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > in
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> the
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Scala/Java
package and merge into v1.4.x
> > > branch
> > > > > is
> > > > > > end
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > of
> > > > > >     > > > next
> > > > > >     > > > > >> week
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > (December
14th) I will communicate as
> soon
> > I
> > > > have
> > > > > > more
> > > > > >     > > > > >> information.
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Regards,
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >> > Steffen
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >     > > > > >> >
> > > > > >     > > > > >>
> > > > > >     > > > > >
> > > > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >     > > >
> > > > > >     > >
> > > > > >     >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message