mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lv, Tao A" <tao.a...@intel.com>
Subject RE: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status
Date Tue, 08 Jan 2019 03:29:56 GMT
What should I do for the double headers in 3rdparty/mkldnn/src/cpu/xbyak/?

-tao

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenrochel@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:51 AM
To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status

Kellen and Tao -
yes, the understanding is that dependencies need to be considered and all licences referenced
to include in top level LICENSE file.
Appreciate your help with it.
Steffen

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:39 PM kellen sunderland < kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry to hear about the licensing issues.  I was following the general 
> vote but I'm still lacking some clarity around what licenses in the 
> onnx-trt repo need to be surfaced.  I believe onnx-trt is MIT 
> licensed, but it includes Onnx as a third party repo which then brings 
> in dependencies with a variety of licenses.  The proposal is that we 
> look at these on an individual basis and then add them to our top level LICENSE file
right?
>
> An alternative is that we may be able to checkout a smaller source 
> code dependency tree if we remove a few unneeded ONNX's dependencies 
> (pybind and google-bench).  My hope is that this wouldn't affect our 
> compilation process and would get us down to two licenses to report 
> (just Onnx and Onnx-TRT, both MIT).
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:07 PM Meghna Baijal 
> <meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > For some more context, these were the last emails I sent on the dev 
> > and legal lists requesting help on the open questions  –
> >
> > 1. Question on legal about the CC-By-2.5 <
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201805.mbox
> /%3CCAK1xzDe6ECToKt_2cTR_7txQQCwHeYfvxXDfmuGgfA3jaTs=Jw@mail.gmail.com
> %3E
> > >
> > 2. Question on dev about googletest file <
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201804.mbox/%3CCAMG
> gKDC8szdfFqQhhSNpwwT_3zi4LBS7A=u4v7KJ4ULE44u3cQ@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > 3. General Request for review of the licenses wiki <
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mxnet-dev/201801.mbox/%3CCAM
> GgKDCi=s933zcVWwei15i5uBC1h88VUogt3Br=Vq28=vi65g@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> >
> >  (Note: You can click on the the “>>” next to the thread on the top 
> > right to view the next responses in the email threads in the apache 
> > archive. )
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Meghna Baijal
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:30 PM Steffen Rochel 
> > <steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear MXNet community -
> > > as you should have seen in previous email, voting for v1.4.0.rc0 
> > > has
> been
> > > cancelled. We received a -1 vote due to outstanding license issues.
> > > Please help to update
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+License
> s
> > > and
> > > resolve outstanding issues.
> > >
> > > I would like to ask specifically for help from contributors to 
> > > mkldnn, opemmp and onnx-tensorrt to address the feedback from 
> > > Justin - see
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ebb8c4c00fb66dd98da13621c7dcb8753
> fee57562a861d61379d31e9@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> > > .
> > >
> > > I suggest to fix the issues first on master, then cherry-pick and 
> > > merge
> > to
> > > 1.4.x branch.
> > >
> > > I'm suggesting to exclude Julia from 1.4.0 release as integration 
> > > into MXNet repo and upgrade to 0.7+ is WIP.
> > > I'm suggesting to exclude googletest/googlemock from 1.4.0 release 
> > > as outstanind license issues are not resolved yet. This should not 
> > > impact users.
> > >
> > > Please provide your feedback to the suggestions.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Steffen
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM Steffen Rochel <
> steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear MXNet community -
> > > > I hope you have seen that voting for v1.4.0.rc0 has started and 
> > > > will continue until December 27th noon. So far two binding +1 votes.
> > > > I suggesting the following schedule to account for holidays and 
> > > > of
> > course
> > > > depending on voting feedback.
> > > >
> > > > Vote on dev@ until 12/27
> > > >
> > > > Vote on general@ 12/28 – 1/3
> > > >
> > > > Release announcement with pre-build language bindings 1/9
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know if you have concerns with the proposed schedule.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Steffen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:22 AM Haibin Lin <
> haibin.lin.aws@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Steffen,
> > > >>
> > > >> Aston and I would like to bring this PR to your attention:
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13686, where Zhi
> fixed
> > > the
> > > >> num_worker argument of DataLoader on windows. Without this fix,
> using
> > > >> DataLoader with num_worker > 0 would result in crash on Windows.
> > > Bringing
> > > >> this PR to 1.4.x would greatly benefit windows users of MXNet. 
> > > >> Aston
> > is
> > > >> working on the dive into deep learning book 
> > > >> <http://diveintodeeplearning.org> based on MXNet, which is due

> > > >> and
> > > frozen
> > > >> for publication next week. Currently the book will depend on 
> > > >> MXNet
> > 1.4.0
> > > >> and discourages readers from using multi-worker DataLoaders due 
> > > >> to
> > this
> > > >> bug
> > > >> on Windows. With this fix Aston can update the examples in the 
> > > >> book
> > with
> > > >> DataLoader using multiple workers, which will be very 
> > > >> beneficial to
> > the
> > > >> broader MXNet community.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Haibin
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:11 AM Pedro Larroy < 
> > > >> pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Steffen
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Added some notes in your PR for the release notes.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > In particular, I'm a bit concerned about the status of 
> > > >> > topology
> > aware
> > > >> > communication, since it has open issues and is not being 
> > > >> > tested in
> > CI.
> > > >> > (The tests also fail). I think we should anounce it when it's
> > working
> > > >> > properly and it's well tested.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Pedro.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:06 AM Steffen Rochel <
> > > >> steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Dear MXNet community -
> > > >> > > all issues beside one
> > > >> > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/13438>

> > > >> > > have
> > been
> > > >> > > addressed. I suggest to document the last remaining issue

> > > >> > > as
> known
> > > >> > problem
> > > >> > > and move forward with the release.
> > > >> > > Please communicate if you have concerns of know about 
> > > >> > > critical
> > > issues
> > > >> to
> > > >> > be
> > > >> > > addressed before starting vote about releasing 1.4.0 as

> > > >> > > soon as
> > > >> possible.
> > > >> > > Please also have a look at the release notes <
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incu
> bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > and provide feedback.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I'm planing to start voting beginning of next week.
> > > >> > > Steffen
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 8:31 PM Steffen Rochel <
> > > >> steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Hi Pedro - this are indeed the draft release notes
for v1.4.0.
> > > >> Please
> > > >> > add
> > > >> > > > description as you suggested.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > All - please have a look at the release notes and provide
> > feedback
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > > suggestions..
> > > >> > > > Steffen
> > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:30 AM Zhao, Patric <
> > > patric.zhao@intel.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> Hi Steffen,
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> I saw the draft of 1.4 release notes in here (
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incu
> bating%29+1.4.0+Release+Notes
> > > >> > > >> ).
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Is this near the final version?  I'd like to add
some
> > > descriptions
> > > >> of
> > > >> > new
> > > >> > > >> quantization features enabled in 1.4.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Is it OK?
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> --Patric
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > > >> > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenrochel@gmail.com]
> > > >> > > >> > Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2018 1:12 AM
> > > >> > > >> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > > >> > Subject: Apache MXNet v1.4.0 release status
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > Dear MXNet community - I would like to provide
update 
> > > >> > > >> > on v1.4.0 status, details
> are
> > > >> tracked
> > > >> > > >> here
> > > >> > > >> > <
> > > >> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i
> > > >> > > >> > ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status>
> > > >> > > >> > .
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > Thank you very much for everybody effort to
resolve 
> > > >> > > >> > the
> > > >> identified
> > > >> > > >> issues.
> > > >> > > >> > We are down to 3 open issues - for details
please see
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28in
> > > >> > > >> > cubating%29+1.
> > > >> > > >> > 4.0
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > +Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.4.0ReleasePlanandS
> > +Release+Plan+and+t
> > > >> > > >> > atu
> > > >> > > >> > +Release+Plan+and+s-OpenPRstotrack
> > > >> > > >> > <
> > > >> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28i
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> ncubating%29+1.4.0+Release+Plan+and+Status#ApacheMXNet(incubating)1.
> > > >> > > >> > 4.0ReleasePlanandStatus-OpenPRstotrack>
> > > >> > > >> > Please help to resolve the remaining issues
and 
> > > >> > > >> > integrate
> to
> > > >> v1.4.x
> > > >> > > >> branch.
> > > >> > > >> > Current estimate to address the identified
security
> > > >> vulnerabilities
> > > >> > in
> > > >> > > >> the
> > > >> > > >> > Scala/Java package and merge into v1.4.x branch
is end 
> > > >> > > >> > of
> > next
> > > >> week
> > > >> > > >> > (December 14th) I will communicate as soon
I have more
> > > >> information.
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > Regards,
> > > >> > > >> > Steffen
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Mime
View raw message