From dev-return-4660-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Thu Nov 1 15:56:59 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B4214180652 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:56:57 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 96693 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2018 14:56:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96681 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2018 14:56:56 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 14:56:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B51661A5032 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 14:56:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.178 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.178 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.289, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q2LYk1FC8gz6 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 14:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi1-f171.google.com (mail-oi1-f171.google.com [209.85.167.171]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8B04F5F32E for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 14:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f171.google.com with SMTP id c25-v6so16850289oiy.0 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 07:56:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CoTJRavgTRze5ggaPZztIkuUtFW097lcixCu4WA/bgA=; b=PUbw2o8zEf+arrnBXfVMCae1WZgwtyjo3JWt+reDz0d2x3nw9cSXYuqxYG4x3uAAvT 9y1o7qrk4aE6FGnqtlwYv3jgEtpv0EIwCc5LjbxnM3Qy/P60GSNLhdY8IlHgXJTob/SS RTTZPx9y4uOzaa95Yc029m7eBkteFzPio8c5/DF5/YHcIjcKMLjN8w7xaWF5dwJek9kP dB3LqcQi128oYpWGgZnkp/Nv2zzTg33+067G+s5jiTqcaR/fh0JINyMHIAQTokeu1+bx FHqknHHYWtUHjK6eORqYMCJsAMi3MkixzVIHGxohaCS8gyMm6/nwgEteRDBZKkFkfOMy 9aag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CoTJRavgTRze5ggaPZztIkuUtFW097lcixCu4WA/bgA=; b=WNlBeGs7EOpy5n/PKKM/E2tU7HnGsDn+zzX4mM5NV9nX6g0X5ykKahbanzy10ZIZC3 VBoXqcmIUHjdWkz2pm3AXU6XEbh82LqNA4sAANE1Nwn84aVwbJRYogQ6gp5dKwlqh3jK 2k0bJK236N/F1KTbYEi6aSvHnI+AkzxSjBqf7g+FIWxEne6iXX13arbdagZ6P1VDy2X7 0GH8QSo9NtaVxefHMvtcXqehmlCSS1usAu426Tcupx9zIcaAwrmRyU0JtfMtlsyCesxE 5K0++FLK5GvLdtDw2aiqYE0GobsTOwNdXHjqQeb6zj8mLWEyrw0PXfgOi5lomioUB+J+ TM9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIr/XDkgoAvHG+6EqnVE6sdMVnEt9vUQUpfKYwSmg05YDY4TIvR 4zUDOq2EnuKTYL0mdabaK53ujaS3VODVTlQoy3ft+Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eCISxkg5LW0fRw1rv7TUJh6GPZBmg9AJ2eYJWPtdZw6kpYCyWYCiqmjXP0hEMrbTxRGVeF8vzmE1YgF59PbbA= X-Received: by 2002:aca:e144:: with SMTP id y65-v6mr4770857oig.289.1541084210598; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 07:56:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3EDB625C-75F6-4383-B580-EE480D9FC073@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Steffen Rochel Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 07:56:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [RESULT][LAZY VOTE] Next MXNet release To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Cc: jason.y.ye@intel.com, alexzai@amazon.com, dzzhen@amazon.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f1192805799ba047" --000000000000f1192805799ba047 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There have been no objections, so lazy vote passed. Anton volunteered to manage the 1.3.1 release and Naveen will support him as co-manager to handle the release tasks requiring committer powers. Please support Anton for a smooth 1.3.1 release process. I'm still looking for volunteers to manage / co-manage the 1.4.0 release. Regards, Steffen On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:33 PM Steffen Rochel wrote: > I calling a lazy vote to release MXNet > 1.3.1 (patch release) and 1.4.0 (minor relase). > > Release content: release proposal page > > > Target milestones: > *1.3.1* > > - Code Freeze: 10/31 > - Release published: 11/13 > > *1.4.0:* > > - Code Freeze: 11/13 > - Release published: 12/13 (if possible announce during NIPS) > > > The vote will be open until Wednesday October 31, 2018 8.00pm PDT. > > Regards, > Steffen > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:56 AM Steffen Rochel > wrote: > >> During the Hangout on Wednesday multiple release proposals have been >> discussed. I summarized discussion here >> and >> updated the release proposal page >> >> . >> Please review, provide feedback and propose changes. >> I plan to start a lazy vote on Sunday regarding the release proposal. >> >> Calling for volunteers to manage the 1.3.1 and 1.4.0 release. >> >> Regards, >> Steffen >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 7:20 AM kellen sunderland < >> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey Steffen, >>> >>> Recommend these be merged into patch release: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12631 >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12603 >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12499 >>> >>> -Kellen >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:17 AM Zhao, Patric >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Thanks to let us know this discussion. >>> > Because we don't have enough bandwidth to track the different sources= , >>> > like discussion forum. >>> > >>> > I think the best way is to open issue in the github so that we can >>> > answer/solve the issue in time :) >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > --Patric >>> > >>> > > -----Original Message----- >>> > > From: Afrooze, Sina [mailto:sina.beh@gmail.com] >>> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 1:14 AM >>> > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org >>> > > Cc: Ye, Jason Y ; Zai, Alexander >>> > > ; Zheng, Da >>> > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release >>> > > >>> > > This post suggests there is a regression from 1.1.0 to 1.2.1 relate= d >>> to >>> > > MKLDNN integration: >>> https://discuss.mxnet.io/t/mxnet-1-2-1-module-get- >>> > > outputs/1882 >>> > > >>> > > The error is related to MKLDNN layout not being converted back to >>> MXNet >>> > > layout in some operator: " !IsMKLDNNData() We can=E2=80=99t generat= e TBlob >>> for >>> > > MKLDNN data. Please use Reorder2Default() to generate a new NDArray >>> > > first" >>> > > >>> > > Sina >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > =EF=BB=BFOn 9/30/18, 6:55 PM, "Steffen Rochel" >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Thanks Patrick. >>> > > Updated roadmap and next release content. >>> > > >>> > > Patrick - suggest to send a reminder to review the design doc a= nd >>> > collect >>> > > feedback. >>> > > Are there still known issues or gaps before we declare MKL-DNN >>> > > integration >>> > > as GA? >>> > > >>> > > Regards, >>> > > Steffen >>> > > >>> > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:31 AM Zhao, Patric < >>> patric.zhao@intel.com> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Thanks, Steffen. >>> > > > >>> > > > Regarding the next release note, two items from our side: >>> > > > >>> > > > 1. (-remove) MKL-DNN integration is done. I think we can remo= ve >>> > this >>> > > item. >>> > > > 2. (+add) MKL-DNN based graph optimization and quantization b= y >>> > > subgraph >>> > > > Design doc: >>> > > > >>> > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Graph+Optimiz >>> > > ation+and+Quantization+based+on+subgraph+and+MKL-DNN >>> > > > Lead Contributor: Patric Zhao, >>> > https://github.com/pengzhao-intel/ >>> > > > >>> > > > Regarding the Roadmap >>> > > > (+add) Q1 2019: MKL-DNN RNN API supports >>> > > > >>> > > > BR, >>> > > > >>> > > > Thanks, >>> > > > >>> > > > --Patric >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > -----Original Message----- >>> > > > > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderland@gmail.com= ] >>> > > > > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2018 11:31 AM >>> > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org >>> > > > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Sorry I meant to say next 'Regarding the *minor* release'. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 5:27 AM kellen sunderland < >>> > > > > kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > Thanks for transparently setting a rough timeline >>> Steffen. I >>> > think >>> > > > > > this will go a long way in helping the community plan the= ir >>> > work, even >>> > > > > > if the details change somewhat on the road to the release= . >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regarding the major release: I would propose we unify >>> TensorRT >>> > with >>> > > > > > the subgraph operator work. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regarding the patch release: There were a few minor >>> > stack/buffer >>> > > > > > overflows exposed by ASAN that have been addressed. It's >>> > probably >>> > > a >>> > > > > > good idea to include them in a patch release, as they at >>> best >>> > result >>> > > > > > in non-deterministic behaviour. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > -Kellen >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:39 AM Steffen Rochel >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> I updated >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+f >>> > > > > >> or+next+MXNet+Release >>> > > > > >> , >>> > > > > >> removed the completed items from 1.3 release and would >>> like to >>> > > kick >>> > > > > >> off discussion about the next release. Please suggest >>> what you >>> > > would >>> > > > > >> like to see included in the next release together with >>> link >>> > to design >>> > > > > >> proposal (appropriately for the size and complexity of t= he >>> > proposal) >>> > > > > >> or suggest changes. >>> > > > > >> I suggest to target the next release for December 2018 t= o >>> > frame the >>> > > > > >> discussion. >>> > > > > >> Lets include review of >>> > > > > >> >>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Roadmap - >>> > > > > >> time to update and discuss changes. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> From the 1.3 release we had discussion regarding >>> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11849 >>> and >>> > > resolution >>> > > > > >> in >>> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12412 . >>> > > > > >> Are you aware of critical issues and feedback from user >>> which >>> > we >>> > > > > >> should consider for a potential 1.3.1 patch release. >>> Should we >>> > > > > >> include PR 12412 in a potential patch release? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> Regards, >>> > > > > >> Steffen >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> >> --000000000000f1192805799ba047--