From dev-return-4692-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Mon Nov 5 18:54:51 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 05159180670 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:54:50 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 92408 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2018 17:54:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88197 invoked by uid 99); 5 Nov 2018 17:52:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 17:52:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C4CC4CCE37 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:52:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nY5RrlAbWW6f for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk1-f174.google.com (mail-qk1-f174.google.com [209.85.222.174]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1F6205F41C for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id o125so16307367qkf.3 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:52:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:reply-to:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7hyaIZ1f6kNNokSXVGNS9QtE1upMVbtSJf5de0iyVm4=; b=hodTijRQ3h4EZw1BlPTB9SD/oVQXgRKwqmPw3pf5nufD6Pw0KaeLI9ldkxt0WvHgR9 AP1EkoDij4uMwyU9bumXsGMufsH1CqnZCuSR7Z0FnObnD9d939c561GcS754g8BJYhfx 46Lpl3R53/ckSKTZWElqKMf45tcAxt3QyCx5BTNtXcY2s1rKMFqP+Vl7Y47FdIwdi7C6 96EFrP6Nty0GYqBtnAZtiWgzHzzdlXrGijwQ+lAP1aNMfBkJvnk8QVn9q5l6XBDeGqFw 76aF4bgmhhTi6yZOILTFKM5fX0r6Rv8cu7WWcPRq8qUMpPmT2oPu7i3aLZVnz1Jp8hrc EJuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKosCnwSyqhuf1NUraLi40FpvZESxTaZm3byDFgvkgUn39gYHJ6 v/o3hAPHcYCMXxhiCtuqj9dqB8pk X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fFJgBe/I3CePZc8+E83mOOJQCaYSygsSIS20yiCBGjrqFFxzyJdMeM3bFnMXjrjP5/MPeAhQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3e19:: with SMTP id z25-v6mr502142qtf.143.1541440323384; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:52:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.19.243.131] (216-165-95-176.NATPOOL.NYU.EDU. [216.165.95.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w201sm4251613qkw.11.2018.11.05.09.52.02 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:52:02 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Separating PMC and Committership To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org References: Reply-To: ssc@apache.org From: Sebastian Message-ID: <28db0323-f96b-245b-0cc7-f1d98f86abd3@apache.org> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 12:52:02 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +1 (binding) On 05.11.18 11:29, Carin Meier wrote: > This is a procedural vote on whether to separate the committer and PPMC > levels in the project. The current state is that a user is considered as > both a committer and a PPMC member at the same time. This vote is to change > that to be able to invite a person in as a committer separately from a PPMC > member. > > Document reference: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member > > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c6ecda02e081aa6b689c92badc9dcf05ced6fb3691fd370471773d1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule unless > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless of > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is typically > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus > for a > modifying factor.) > > The vote will run until Friday Nov 9th at 6:00 am EST > > Thanks, > Carin >