mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From kellen sunderland <kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MKLDNN dynamically linked
Date Thu, 08 Nov 2018 23:29:31 GMT
I think we should bias towards static linking.  It should make using mxnet
easier in a lot of cases for users.  As long as the license permits static
linking (i.e. is non-gpl) I'd +1 static linking for portability and ease of
use.  The only caveat would be in cases where the package size would cause
grief for PyPi maintainers.

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 3:54 PM Sheng Zha <zhasheng@apache.org wrote:

> +1. Ideally, MKLDNN can be statically linked. mxnet-mkl relies on Make for
> building it so help is wanted on mxnet.
>
> -sz
>
> On 2018/11/08 21:28:50, Alex Zai <azai91@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Currently in mxnet-mkl the libmxnet.so is dynamically linked to to
> > libmkldnn.so.0. This is known to cause some issues if the wrong version
> of
> > mkldnn is linked. Can we static link this file instead?
> >
> > Alex
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message