mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Zhao, Patric" <patric.z...@intel.com>
Subject RE: MKLDNN dynamically linked
Date Thu, 08 Nov 2018 23:51:24 GMT
+1 for static link :)

Feel free to let us know if anything we can help.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderland@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 7:30 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Cc: dev@mxnet.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MKLDNN dynamically linked
> 
> I think we should bias towards static linking.  It should make using mxnet
> easier in a lot of cases for users.  As long as the license permits static linking
> (i.e. is non-gpl) I'd +1 static linking for portability and ease of use.  The only
> caveat would be in cases where the package size would cause grief for PyPi
> maintainers.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 3:54 PM Sheng Zha <zhasheng@apache.org wrote:
> 
> > +1. Ideally, MKLDNN can be statically linked. mxnet-mkl relies on Make
> > +for
> > building it so help is wanted on mxnet.
> >
> > -sz
> >
> > On 2018/11/08 21:28:50, Alex Zai <azai91@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Currently in mxnet-mkl the libmxnet.so is dynamically linked to to
> > > libmkldnn.so.0. This is known to cause some issues if the wrong
> > > version
> > of
> > > mkldnn is linked. Can we static link this file instead?
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> >
Mime
View raw message