mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Markham <aaron.s.mark...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] - Adopt "Become a Committer and PPMC Member" Document
Date Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:09:27 GMT
+1 non-binding
One minor thing first: can you define PPMC in the doc? It's brought in
without saying what it stands for. Even the link it goes to just talks
about PMC and there's no mention of PMCC... so I'm not sure what the
definition is.


On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:07 AM Carin Meier <carinmeier@gmail.com> wrote:

> From the feedback in the thread. I changed the wording of "Privileges" to
> "Rights and Responsibilities".
>
> If I misunderstood anything, please let me know.
>
> Best,
> Carin
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:00 AM Sergio Fernández <wikier@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 since the Beam model is much more open than the current one.
> >
> > Here my two cents to the discussion:
> >
> > You can see that in the past was different,, but we had evolved as
> > foundation. As general recommendation, the new way is to spend less
> effort
> > in ad-hoc bylaws on every project/podling and adopt the general ones. The
> > easier the project is managed, normally the better the community evolves.
> >
> > In addition, as a linguistic detail: commiters and/or pmc do not have
> more
> > "privileges", but "responsibilities".
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, 15:47 Carin Meier <carinmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This vote is to adopt the document
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal
> > > to replace the current document
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer
> > >
> > > The dev discussion thread is here
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e61ffa26af374de7a99c475d406e462a00b26cfc1155e232198dd53e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined
> > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > >
> > > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule
> > unless
> > > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than
> > > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless
> > of
> > > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too
> > > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is
> > typically
> > > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus
> > > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a
> > > modifying factor.)
> > >
> > > The vote will run until Friday Nov 2nd at 6:00 am EST
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Carin
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message