mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3
Date Sat, 01 Sep 2018 02:59:03 GMT
Thanks Pedro for bringing up this issue. Will add it in release notes.

@Sandeep, Thanks for working on this bug. For now, not prioritizing fix in
the release branch. We can address it in the next releases.

As we have not added Scala maven packages in previous release testing, we
will not be delaying the voting process anymore.
I will send a separate release voting email.

Thanks,
Roshani

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:34 AM sandeep krishnamurthy <
sandeep.krishna98@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Roshani/Sheng/MXNet community,
>
> Thanks for handling 1.3 release.
>
> Here is an issue - https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11849,
> where you cannot import non-fp32 models into Gluon Symbol block. I think
> this is an important feature for our users who imports a FP16, FP64 models
> into Gluon.
> I have created a PR for the fix -
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12412 reviewed by one
> community member (Lin) and I would like to work towards getting this
> merged, please chime in for review.
>
> Since we have not started the vote yet, I suggest we cherry pick this bug
> fix in to the RC.
>
> Let me know your suggestions.
>
> Best,
> Sandeep
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:38 AM Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > The armv7 docker builds are broken due to a problem with dockcross. Shall
> > we add this to the release notes?  I'm working on a fix. Best would be to
> > get the fix on the release branch.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12421
> >
> > Pedro
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:38 AM Roshani Nagmote <
> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I was waiting to run nightly builds to pass on the release branch. So
> RC0
> > > was a bit delayed.
> > > Now, we have tagged the release candidate! Thanks a lot Sheng for
> helping
> > > with this!
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.3.0.rc0
> > >
> > > Voting process to test RC0 will start after Scala package gets
> published
> > to
> > > maven repositories.
> > > I had an offline discussion with Naveen and Qing who will be working on
> > > publishing Scala packages. They want to include Scala packages in
> testing
> > > as well.
> > >
> > > I will communicate timelines for voting soon.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Roshani
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:24 AM kellen sunderland <
> > > kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Great news!  Thanks for the efforts Roshani + Sheng.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 6:58 PM Roshani Nagmote <
> > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Release branch v1.3.x was cut yesterday night. Thanks, @Sheng for
> > > helping
> > > > > with this and merging a bunch of PRs. I will be running tests on
> the
> > > > branch
> > > > > and move forward with the release steps now. :)
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Roshani
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:12 AM Roshani Nagmote <
> > > > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Patric for reviewing the notes. Updated the doc with
> MKL-DNN
> > > > > points
> > > > > > you mentioned accordingly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Roshani
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 8:03 PM Zhao, Patric <
> > patric.zhao@intel.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Roshani,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Good notes :)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Several items about the performance and MKL-DNN in the below,
> > please
> > > > > help
> > > > > >> take a review.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> @Da, Alex, if anything about MKL-DNN is missed, feel free to
> add.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> *Performance improvement
> > > > > >> +Support for dot(dns, csr) = dns and dot(dns, csr.T) = dns on
> CPU
> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11113
> > > > > >> +Performance improvement for Batch Dot on CPU from mshadow
> > > > > >> https://github.com/dmlc/mshadow/pull/342
> > > > > >> -Fix the topk regression issue (#12197)
> > > > > >> This is the bugfix rather than performance improvements
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> *MKL-DNN
> > > > > >> More functionality supports:
> > > > > >> +Support more activation functions, "sigmoid", "tanh",
> "softrelu"
> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10336
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Debugging functionality:
> > > > > >> +Result check
> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12069
> > > > > >> +Backend switch
> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12058
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --Patric
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > >> > From: Roshani Nagmote [mailto:roshaninagmote2@gmail.com]
> > > > > >> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 1:53 AM
> > > > > >> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Hi,
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thank you everyone for helping to clear release blockers. CI
> > tests
> > > > > were
> > > > > >> failing
> > > > > >> > so we delayed RC by some time. But now the tests are passing
> and
> > > we
> > > > > are
> > > > > >> > ready to cut the release branch.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I have drafted release notes here:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28in
> > > > > >> > cubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Notes
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Please take a look and update if I have missed anything. I
> will
> > be
> > > > > >> cutting
> > > > > >> > RC0 tomorrow.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > Roshani
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 2:28 PM Roshani Nagmote
> > > > > >> > <roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Sure will do. thanks.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > -Roshani
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:53 AM Afrooze, Sina <
> > > > sina.beh@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> Hi Roshani - Can you please make sure that this fix (which
> is
> > > > > already
> > > > > >> > >> merged to master) is also merged to the stable branch for
> > > 1.3.0:
> > > > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11493 -
> > Thanks,
> > > > > Sina
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> On 8/16/18, 10:51 AM, "Roshani Nagmote"
> > > > > >> > <roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     Hi all,
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     Release status:
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     Currently, for release 1.3.0 there are a couple of
> issues
> > > > open
> > > > > >> > >> which needs
> > > > > >> > >>     to be resolved before cutting RC.
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     The current date we are looking at for cutting RC0 is
> > > > > >> 08/17(Friday).
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     Open issues which need to be looked at before cutting
> RC:
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>        1. Topk regression issue
> > > > > >> > >>        <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12197
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > > >> > >> #12202 PR
> > > > > >> > >>        with fix <
> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12202>
> > > > > >> > >>        2. Excessive memory allocation issue
> > > > > >> > >>        <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > > >> > >> #12184 PR
> > > > > >> > >>        with fix <
> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12184>
> > > > > >> > >>        3. Test_io.test_csvIter breaks on CentOS
> > > > > >> > >>        <
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12139
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > > >> > >> #12189 PR
> > > > > >> > >>        with fix
> > > > > >> > >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12189>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     @committers, could you please help review these PRs and
> > get
> > > > > them
> > > > > >> > >> merged?
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:46 PM Roshani Nagmote <
> > > > > >> > >> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >>     wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     > Talked to the person who ran resnet50 benchmarks
> > offline.
> > > > > Build
> > > > > >> > >> flag was
> > > > > >> > >>     > not properly set so there was a difference in
> > performance
> > > > > >> > >> numbers observed.
> > > > > >> > >>     > There is no issue caught and he was able to get the
> > same
> > > > > >> results as
> > > > > >> > >>     > mentioned here
> > > > > >> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html
> > > > > >> > >>     > <
> > > > > >>
> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html#scoring-results>
> > > > > >> > >>     >
> > > > > >> > >>     > We are good here.
> > > > > >> > >>     >
> > > > > >> > >>     > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >>     > Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >
> > > > > >> > >>     > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:08 PM Roshani Nagmote <
> > > > > >> > >> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >>     > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >> Hi Dom,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >> I verified resnet50 run on MXNet master branch.
> > Checked
> > > on
> > > > > >> > >> single gpu
> > > > > >> > >>     >> machine. Numbers match. I didn't see any performance
> > > > > >> degradation.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>
> > > > > >>
> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html#scoring-results
> > > > > >> > >>     >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >> Can you please give me more details on the instance
> > type
> > > > and
> > > > > >> > >> script you
> > > > > >> > >>     >> ran exactly so that I can try to reproduce it again?
> > > > > >> > >>     >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >>     >> Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:31 PM Roshani Nagmote <
> > > > > >> > >>     >> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>> This is not a major feature. I meant other new
> > feature
> > > > > >> > >> requests PR won't
> > > > > >> > >>     >>> be accepted in 1.3 release now.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>> Bug fixes will be accepted. I will be trying to
> > > reproduce
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> > >> regression
> > > > > >> > >>     >>> Dom mentioned today. :)
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>> Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>> Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:06 PM Naveen Swamy
> > > > > >> > >> <mnnaveen@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> Is this is a major feature? This is a regression
> > that
> > > > Dom
> > > > > is
> > > > > >> > >> reporting
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> wrt
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> to performance
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Roshani Nagmote
> <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > Thanks for reporting this issue Dom.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > 08/10 (Frida)y was the major feature freeze
> date.
> > We
> > > > > >> won't be
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> accepting any
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > new features now for MXNet 1.3 release.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > RC0 will be cut on 08/17(Friday).
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > Will be verifying the performance degradation
> > issue
> > > > > >> mentioned.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:45 AM Divakaruni,
> > Dominic
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > <ddivakar@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > Hi all, We tested resnet50 on MXNet built from
> > > > master
> > > > > >> > >> branch on
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> Friday
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > and
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > were seeing degraded performance on GPU -
> about
> > > 50%
> > > > > >> > >> slower compared
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > these values here
> > > > > >> > >> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> FWIW
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > this slowdown was seen for both MXNet as well
> as
> > > the
> > > > > TRT
> > > > > >> > >> integrated
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > MXNet.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > Something for you all to verify before or
> after
> > > you
> > > > > cut
> > > > > >> > >> the RC.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > Thx!
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > On 8/13/18, 4:34 AM, "kellen sunderland" <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     Hey Roshani,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     Has a RC branch already been cut?  If so,
> a
> > > > quick
> > > > > >> heads
> > > > > >> > >> up that
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> I
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > think
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     this commit should probably get into RC0
> for
> > > > 1.3.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > ee8755a2531b322fec29c9c3d2aa3b8738da41f3
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     It won't cause issues for users, but from
> a
> > > > > >> versioning
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> compatibility
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     perspective it's probably better that we
> > > remove
> > > > > >> these
> > > > > >> > >> functions
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> in
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > this
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     release. This way we don't have to worry
> > about
> > > > > major
> > > > > >> > >> bumps in
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> the
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > next
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     release if they're removed.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     -Kellen
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:24 PM Roshani
> > > Nagmote
> > > > <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > Thanks Kellen and everyone else for
> > working
> > > to
> > > > > get
> > > > > >> > >> TensorRT PR
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > merged!
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > @Sina, I will be keeping track of that
> > issue
> > > > and
> > > > > >> fixes
> > > > > >> > >> to get
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> in
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > the
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > release.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > We are starting code freeze for 1.3
> > release
> > > > > >> today. A
> > > > > >> > >> release
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > candidate will
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > be cut on 08/17.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > Feel free to add any other
> > > > comments/suggestions.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:39 AM kellen
> > > > > sunderland
> > > > > >> <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > All merged and ready to go from my
> side
> > > > > Roshani
> > > > > >> (the
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> TensorRT
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > PR).
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > I agree with Sina that issue 12116
> looks
> > > > it's
> > > > > a
> > > > > >> > >> blocker.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> I'll
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > try
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > and
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > reproduce it locally to get another
> > > > datapoint.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:15 AM
> Afrooze,
> > > > Sina
> > > > > <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > sina.beh@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > Hi Roshani - I think this regression
> > > issue
> > > > > is
> > > > > >> a
> > > > > >> > >> release
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > blocker:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> - Sina
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > On 8/8/18, 12:40 PM, "Roshani
> > Nagmote" <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     Thanks, Kellen for letting me
> > know.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM
> > > kellen
> > > > > >> > >> sunderland <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     kellen.sunderland@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > Hey Roshani, I think it should
> > be
> > > > > ready
> > > > > >> by
> > > > > >> > >> Friday.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 10:20 PM
> > > > Roshani
> > > > > >> > >> Nagmote <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > Thanks Kellen. Yes, we were
> > > > treating
> > > > > >> this
> > > > > >> > >> PR as a
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > release
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > blocker.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > Do you
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > have any ETA by which it
> will
> > be
> > > > > >> completed?
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> Approximate
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > time
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > will
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > also
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > work.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > @zhi, Thanks for bringing
> this
> > > PR
> > > > > into
> > > > > >> > >> notice. I
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> will
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > keep a
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > track
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > of it.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > -Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:30
> > AM
> > > > > >> Joshua Z.
> > > > > >> > >> Zhang <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > cheungchih@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > I strongly suggest to
> track
> > > this
> > > > > PR
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > in 1.3
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > release
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > which fixed the usability
> > > issue
> > > > > for
> > > > > >> > >> lower end
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > machines
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > that
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > don’t have
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > as
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > large shared memory space
> as
> > > ec2
> > > > > >> > >> instances.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > Best,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > - Zhi
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:05
> > AM,
> > > > > >> Roshani
> > > > > >> > >> Nagmote <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Right now, we are
> delaying
> > > > MXNet
> > > > > >> 1.3
> > > > > >> > >> release
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> for
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > pending
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > TensorRT PR
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > (
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > ).
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > I wanted to ask everyone
> > for
> > > > > their
> > > > > >> > >> opinions
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> if we
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > should
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > delay
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > the
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > release
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > to get tensorRT
> > integration
> > > in
> > > > > or
> > > > > >> we
> > > > > >> > >> should go
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > ahead
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > with
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > the
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > release
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > and
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > include tensorRT in next
> > > > > release.
> > > > > >> > >> Please
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> provide
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > suggestions.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at
> > 12:45
> > > > AM
> > > > > >> Hagay
> > > > > >> > >> Lupesko
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > lupesko@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Some thoughts: why not
> > keep
> > > > it
> > > > > >> out of
> > > > > >> > >> 1.3,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> and
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > merge it
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > into
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > master
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > so
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > it
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> can go out with 1.4
> > > instead?
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Pros:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - Reduce quality risks
> > for
> > > > 1.3
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - More time to test and
> > get
> > > > > >> feedback
> > > > > >> > >> before
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > release
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - Avoid further delays
> in
> > > 1.3
> > > > > >> release
> > > > > >> > >> (lots
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> of
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > good
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > stuff
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > there
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > already
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > for
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> users)
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Cons:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - People will need to
> get
> > > > > master
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> experiment
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > with
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > TRT
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > (not
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > a major
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > issue
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> IMO)
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Besides, TRT requires a
> > > build
> > > > > >> flag
> > > > > >> > >> anyway, so
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > MXNet
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > users
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > consuming
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > built
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> packages (PyPi, Scala)
> > will
> > > > > >> anyway
> > > > > >> > >> not be
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> able to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > try it
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > out
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > unless
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> building from source...
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Thoughts?
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at
> > > 10:38
> > > > PM
> > > > > >> > >> Steffen
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> Rochel <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > steffenrochel@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Marek, Kellen, Jun,
> Da,
> > > > Eric,
> > > > > >> myself
> > > > > >> > >> and a
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> few
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > other
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > people
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > discussed
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> offline about TensorRT
> > > > > >> integration
> > > > > >> > >> PR (
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
> > > > > ).
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > We
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > do
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > agree
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > that
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> it
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> would be good to
> include
> > > the
> > > > > PR
> > > > > >> into
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> upcoming 1.3
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > release,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > but are
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > all
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> concerned about the
> risk
> > > > > >> involved
> > > > > >> > >> and the
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > breaking
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > API
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > change. The
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> discussion converged
> to
> > > > > >> following
> > > > > >> > >> proposal.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> (1)
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > change to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > contrib
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > PR
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > and
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> (2) define a different
> > top
> > > > > >> level API
> > > > > >> > >> to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> indicate
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > that the
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > package
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > is
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > part
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> of contrib and
> > > experimental
> > > > > >> (details
> > > > > >> > >> of API
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> TBD
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > between
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > Marek,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > Kellen
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > and
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Eric). This change
> would
> > > > allow
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> > >> include
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> TRT
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > integration
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > with v1.3
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> enable users to try
> TRT
> > > with
> > > > > >> MXNet,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> minimize the
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > risk and
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > avoid
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > breaking
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> API change.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> To accommodate the
> > change
> > > > the
> > > > > >> > >> request is to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> delay
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > RC for
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > a
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > few
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > days.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Steffen
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018
> at
> > > 5:08
> > > > > PM
> > > > > >> > >> Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> Nagmote <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
> > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Hi,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> I have created a wiki
> > for
> > > > > >> tracking
> > > > > >> > >> MXNet
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> 1.3
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > release
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > with
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > the
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > timeline.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Please take a look
> > here:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> >
> Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Status
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> I am still waiting
> for
> > > > > >> following 2
> > > > > >> > >> PRs to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> get
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > merged:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> TRT integration:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Gluon RNN:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> *Code freeze date is
> > > > > >> > >> 08/02(Thursday).*
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> Kindly
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > try
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > complete
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > ongoing
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> work
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> and get these PRs
> > merged.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018
> at
> > > > 1:02
> > > > > PM
> > > > > >> > >> Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> Nagmote
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
> > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Hi all,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Here is an update on
> > > MXNet
> > > > > 1.3
> > > > > >> > >> release:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> I am still waiting
> for
> > > > > >> following
> > > > > >> > >> PRs to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> get
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > merged:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> TRT integration:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Gluon RNN:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Scala examples:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11753
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11621
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> *New code freeze
> date
> > > is:
> > > > > >> 08/03*
> > > > > >> > >> Please
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> try to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > get
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > your
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > ongoing
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > PRs
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> merged by then.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> @Pedro, I didn't
> > include
> > > > > your
> > > > > >> PRs
> > > > > >> > >> in
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> tracking
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > list as
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > you
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > said
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > those
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> are
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> not critical for
> now.
> > > > Please
> > > > > >> let
> > > > > >> > >> me know
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> if
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > those needs
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > be
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> included.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> I also have updated
> > > > project
> > > > > >> > >> proposal
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> cwiki page
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > to
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > update
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > the
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > status
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> of
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> PRs.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Please let me know
> if
> > I
> > > am
> > > > > >> missing
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> something.
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018
> > at
> > > > 1:34
> > > > > >> PM
> > > > > >> > >> Pedro
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> Larroy <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> > > > pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> I would like to get
> > > these
> > > > > PR
> > > > > >> > >> merged:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> How much longer
> until
> > > the
> > > > > >> code
> > > > > >> > >> freeze?
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 26,
> 2018
> > at
> > > > > 1:44
> > > > > >> AM
> > > > > >> > >> Roshani
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > Nagmote
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > <
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> > > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Hi all,
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> PRs waiting to be
> > > merged
> > > > > >> for 1.3
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> release:
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Are there any
> other
> > > PRs
> > > > > >> waiting
> > > > > >> > >> to get
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > merged?
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > > Please
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > let me
> > > > > >> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > know.
> > > > > >> > >>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message