mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Qing Lan <lanking...@live.com>
Subject Re: Reformulating to a more efficient design of Mxnet-label-Bot
Date Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:28:45 GMT
Great work Harsh! I like your webhook design. This would allow us to do a great more for the
label bot and speed up the response time.

-Marco: I think Anton means the "Assignees" field in issues and PRs

Thanks,
Qing
On 9/27/18, 5:06 PM, "Marco de Abreu" <marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com.INVALID> wrote:

    You mean like a replacement for the codeowners feature?
    
    Anton Chernov <mechernov@gmail.com> schrieb am Fr., 28. Sep. 2018, 01:39:
    
    > As a feature request: Could we include detection and proposal of reviewers
    > to the bot as well?
    >
    > Anton
    >
    > чт, 27 сент. 2018 г. в 15:27, Harsh Patel <harshpatel081296@gmail.com>:
    >
    > > Hey,
    > > I'm Harsh Patel, and I am looking to contribute to MXNet. I wanted to get
    > > some feedback to improvements that could be made with the current
    > structure
    > > that we have for automatically labelling issues and pull requests. I have
    > > linked my proposed design structure on the bottom of this wiki page (
    > >
    > >
    > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Machine+Learning+Based+GitHub+Bot
    > > )
    > > - it should be under 7. Overall, users will benefit from this design
    > since
    > > it will allow adding, updating, and deleting of labels freely. Label
    > > creation will be faster since this model focuses on labelling an issue as
    > > soon as it is made. Another key benefit is that we minimize the number of
    > > total GitHub API calls that need to be made. Feedback would be much
    > > appreciated - I would like to hear what the developers have to say!
    > Thanks.
    > >
    >
    

Mime
View raw message