mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3
Date Thu, 23 Aug 2018 16:58:10 GMT
Release branch v1.3.x was cut yesterday night. Thanks, @Sheng for helping
with this and merging a bunch of PRs. I will be running tests on the branch
and move forward with the release steps now. :)
Thanks,
Roshani

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:12 AM Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Patric for reviewing the notes. Updated the doc with MKL-DNN points
> you mentioned accordingly.
>
> Regards,
> Roshani
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 8:03 PM Zhao, Patric <patric.zhao@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Roshani,
>>
>> Good notes :)
>>
>> Several items about the performance and MKL-DNN in the below, please help
>> take a review.
>>
>> @Da, Alex, if anything about MKL-DNN is missed, feel free to add.
>>
>> *Performance improvement
>> +Support for dot(dns, csr) = dns and dot(dns, csr.T) = dns on CPU
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11113
>> +Performance improvement for Batch Dot on CPU from mshadow
>> https://github.com/dmlc/mshadow/pull/342
>> -Fix the topk regression issue (#12197)
>> This is the bugfix rather than performance improvements
>>
>>
>> *MKL-DNN
>> More functionality supports:
>> +Support more activation functions, "sigmoid", "tanh", "softrelu"
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/10336
>>
>> Debugging functionality:
>> +Result check
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12069
>> +Backend switch
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12058
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Patric
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Roshani Nagmote [mailto:roshaninagmote2@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 1:53 AM
>> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Thank you everyone for helping to clear release blockers. CI tests were
>> failing
>> > so we delayed RC by some time. But now the tests are passing and we are
>> > ready to cut the release branch.
>> >
>> > I have drafted release notes here:
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28in
>> > cubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Notes
>> >
>> >
>> > Please take a look and update if I have missed anything. I will be
>> cutting
>> > RC0 tomorrow.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Roshani
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 2:28 PM Roshani Nagmote
>> > <roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Sure will do. thanks.
>> > >
>> > > -Roshani
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:53 AM Afrooze, Sina <sina.beh@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Roshani - Can you please make sure that this fix (which is already
>> > >> merged to master) is also merged to the stable branch for 1.3.0:
>> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11493 - Thanks, Sina
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On 8/16/18, 10:51 AM, "Roshani Nagmote"
>> > <roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>     Hi all,
>> > >>
>> > >>     Release status:
>> > >>
>> > >>     Currently, for release 1.3.0 there are a couple of issues open
>> > >> which needs
>> > >>     to be resolved before cutting RC.
>> > >>
>> > >>     The current date we are looking at for cutting RC0 is
>> 08/17(Friday).
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>     Open issues which need to be looked at before cutting RC:
>> > >>
>> > >>        1. Topk regression issue
>> > >>        <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12197> -
>> > >> #12202 PR
>> > >>        with fix <
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12202>
>> > >>        2. Excessive memory allocation issue
>> > >>        <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116> -
>> > >> #12184 PR
>> > >>        with fix <
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12184>
>> > >>        3. Test_io.test_csvIter breaks on CentOS
>> > >>        <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12139> -
>> > >> #12189 PR
>> > >>        with fix
>> > >> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12189>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>     @committers, could you please help review these PRs and get them
>> > >> merged?
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>     Thanks,
>> > >>
>> > >>     Roshani
>> > >>
>> > >>     On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:46 PM Roshani Nagmote <
>> > >> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >>     wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>     > Talked to the person who ran resnet50 benchmarks offline. Build
>> > >> flag was
>> > >>     > not properly set so there was a difference in performance
>> > >> numbers observed.
>> > >>     > There is no issue caught and he was able to get the same
>> results as
>> > >>     > mentioned here
>> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html
>> > >>     > <
>> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html#scoring-results>
>> > >>     >
>> > >>     > We are good here.
>> > >>     >
>> > >>     > Thanks,
>> > >>     > Roshani
>> > >>     >
>> > >>     > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:08 PM Roshani Nagmote <
>> > >> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >>     > wrote:
>> > >>     >
>> > >>     >> Hi Dom,
>> > >>     >>
>> > >>     >> I verified resnet50 run on MXNet master branch. Checked on
>> > >> single gpu
>> > >>     >> machine. Numbers match. I didn't see any performance
>> degradation.
>> > >>     >>
>> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html#scoring-results
>> > >>     >>
>> > >>     >> Can you please give me more details on the instance type and
>> > >> script you
>> > >>     >> ran exactly so that I can try to reproduce it again?
>> > >>     >>
>> > >>     >> Thanks,
>> > >>     >> Roshani
>> > >>     >>
>> > >>     >>
>> > >>     >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:31 PM Roshani Nagmote <
>> > >>     >> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>     >>
>> > >>     >>> This is not a major feature. I meant other new feature
>> > >> requests PR won't
>> > >>     >>> be accepted in 1.3 release now.
>> > >>     >>> Bug fixes will be accepted. I will be trying to reproduce the
>> > >> regression
>> > >>     >>> Dom mentioned today. :)
>> > >>     >>>
>> > >>     >>> Thanks,
>> > >>     >>> Roshani
>> > >>     >>>
>> > >>     >>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:06 PM Naveen Swamy
>> > >> <mnnaveen@gmail.com
>> > >> >
>> > >>     >>> wrote:
>> > >>     >>>
>> > >>     >>>> Is this is a major feature? This is a regression that Dom is
>> > >> reporting
>> > >>     >>>> wrt
>> > >>     >>>> to performance
>> > >>     >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Roshani Nagmote <
>> > >>     >>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > >>     >>>> > wrote:
>> > >>     >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > Thanks for reporting this issue Dom.
>> > >>     >>>> > 08/10 (Frida)y was the major feature freeze date. We
>> won't be
>> > >>     >>>> accepting any
>> > >>     >>>> > new features now for MXNet 1.3 release.
>> > >>     >>>> > RC0 will be cut on 08/17(Friday).
>> > >>     >>>> >
>> > >>     >>>> > Will be verifying the performance degradation issue
>> mentioned.
>> > >>     >>>> >
>> > >>     >>>> > Thanks,
>> > >>     >>>> > Roshani
>> > >>     >>>> >
>> > >>     >>>> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:45 AM Divakaruni, Dominic
>> > >>     >>>> > <ddivakar@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> >
>> > >>     >>>> > > Hi all, We tested resnet50 on MXNet built from master
>> > >> branch on
>> > >>     >>>> Friday
>> > >>     >>>> > and
>> > >>     >>>> > > were seeing degraded performance on GPU - about 50%
>> > >> slower compared
>> > >>     >>>> to
>> > >>     >>>> > > these values here
>> > >> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html.
>> > >>     >>>> FWIW
>> > >>     >>>> > > this slowdown was seen for both MXNet as well as the TRT
>> > >> integrated
>> > >>     >>>> > MXNet.
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > > Something for you all to verify before or after you cut
>> > >> the RC.
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > > Thx!
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > > On 8/13/18, 4:34 AM, "kellen sunderland" <
>> > >>     >>>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com>
>> > >>     >>>> > > wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     Hey Roshani,
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     Has a RC branch already been cut?  If so, a quick
>> heads
>> > >> up that
>> > >>     >>>> I
>> > >>     >>>> > think
>> > >>     >>>> > >     this commit should probably get into RC0 for 1.3.
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>> > >>     >>>> > ee8755a2531b322fec29c9c3d2aa3b8738da41f3
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     It won't cause issues for users, but from a
>> versioning
>> > >>     >>>> compatibility
>> > >>     >>>> > >     perspective it's probably better that we remove
>> these
>> > >> functions
>> > >>     >>>> in
>> > >>     >>>> > this
>> > >>     >>>> > >     release. This way we don't have to worry about major
>> > >> bumps in
>> > >>     >>>> the
>> > >>     >>>> > next
>> > >>     >>>> > >     release if they're removed.
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     -Kellen
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:24 PM Roshani Nagmote <
>> > >>     >>>> > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > Thanks Kellen and everyone else for working to get
>> > >> TensorRT PR
>> > >>     >>>> > > merged!
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > @Sina, I will be keeping track of that issue and
>> fixes
>> > >> to get
>> > >>     >>>> in
>> > >>     >>>> > the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > release.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > We are starting code freeze for 1.3 release
>> today. A
>> > >> release
>> > >>     >>>> > > candidate will
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > be cut on 08/17.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > Feel free to add any other comments/suggestions.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > Thanks,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > Roshani
>> > >>     >>>> > >     >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:39 AM kellen sunderland
>> <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > All merged and ready to go from my side Roshani
>> (the
>> > >>     >>>> TensorRT
>> > >>     >>>> > PR).
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > I agree with Sina that issue 12116 looks it's a
>> > >> blocker.
>> > >>     >>>> I'll
>> > >>     >>>> > try
>> > >>     >>>> > > and
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > reproduce it locally to get another datapoint.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:15 AM Afrooze, Sina <
>> > >>     >>>> > sina.beh@gmail.com>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > Hi Roshani - I think this regression issue is
>> a
>> > >> release
>> > >>     >>>> > blocker:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
>> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116
>> > >>     >>>> - Sina
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > On 8/8/18, 12:40 PM, "Roshani Nagmote" <
>> > >>     >>>> > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     Thanks, Kellen for letting me know.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM kellen
>> > >> sunderland <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > Hey Roshani, I think it should be ready
>> by
>> > >> Friday.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 10:20 PM Roshani
>> > >> Nagmote <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > Thanks Kellen. Yes, we were treating
>> this
>> > >> PR as a
>> > >>     >>>> > release
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > blocker.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > Do you
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > have any ETA by which it will be
>> completed?
>> > >>     >>>> Approximate
>> > >>     >>>> > > time
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > will
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > also
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > work.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > @zhi, Thanks for bringing this PR into
>> > >> notice. I
>> > >>     >>>> will
>> > >>     >>>> > > keep a
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > track
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > of it.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > -Roshani
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:30 AM
>> Joshua Z.
>> > >> Zhang <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > cheungchih@gmail.com>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > I strongly suggest to track this PR
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908
>> > >>     >>>> > <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>> > >>     >>>> > > in 1.3
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > release
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > which fixed the usability issue for
>> > >> lower end
>> > >>     >>>> > machines
>> > >>     >>>> > > that
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > don’t have
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > as
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > large shared memory space as ec2
>> > >> instances.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > Best,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > - Zhi
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:05 AM,
>> Roshani
>> > >> Nagmote <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Hi all,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Right now, we are delaying MXNet
>> 1.3
>> > >> release
>> > >>     >>>> for
>> > >>     >>>> > > pending
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > TensorRT PR
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > (
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > https://github.com/apache/
>> > >>     >>>> > incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>> > >>     >>>> > > ).
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > I wanted to ask everyone for their
>> > >> opinions
>> > >>     >>>> if we
>> > >>     >>>> > > should
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > delay
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > release
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > to get tensorRT integration in or
>> we
>> > >> should go
>> > >>     >>>> > ahead
>> > >>     >>>> > > with
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > release
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > and
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > include tensorRT in next release.
>> > >> Please
>> > >>     >>>> provide
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > suggestions.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Thanks,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Roshani
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:45 AM
>> Hagay
>> > >> Lupesko
>> > >>     >>>> <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > lupesko@gmail.com>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Some thoughts: why not keep it
>> out of
>> > >> 1.3,
>> > >>     >>>> and
>> > >>     >>>> > > merge it
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > into
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > master
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > so
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > it
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> can go out with 1.4 instead?
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Pros:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - Reduce quality risks for 1.3
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - More time to test and get
>> feedback
>> > >> before
>> > >>     >>>> > release
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - Avoid further delays in 1.3
>> release
>> > >> (lots
>> > >>     >>>> of
>> > >>     >>>> > good
>> > >>     >>>> > > stuff
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > there
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > already
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > for
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> users)
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Cons:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - People will need to get master
>> to
>> > >>     >>>> experiment
>> > >>     >>>> > with
>> > >>     >>>> > > TRT
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > (not
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > a major
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > issue
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> IMO)
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Besides, TRT requires a build
>> flag
>> > >> anyway, so
>> > >>     >>>> > MXNet
>> > >>     >>>> > > users
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > consuming
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > built
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> packages (PyPi, Scala) will
>> anyway
>> > >> not be
>> > >>     >>>> able to
>> > >>     >>>> > > try it
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > out
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > unless
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> building from source...
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Thoughts?
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 10:38 PM
>> > >> Steffen
>> > >>     >>>> Rochel <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > steffenrochel@gmail.com
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Marek, Kellen, Jun, Da, Eric,
>> myself
>> > >> and a
>> > >>     >>>> few
>> > >>     >>>> > > other
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > people
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > discussed
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> offline about TensorRT
>> integration
>> > >> PR (
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 ).
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > We
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > do
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > agree
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > that
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> it
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> would be good to include the PR
>> into
>> > >>     >>>> upcoming 1.3
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > release,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > but are
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > all
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> concerned about the risk
>> involved
>> > >> and the
>> > >>     >>>> > breaking
>> > >>     >>>> > > API
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > change. The
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> discussion converged to
>> following
>> > >> proposal.
>> > >>     >>>> (1)
>> > >>     >>>> > > change to
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > contrib
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > PR
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > and
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> (2) define a different top
>> level API
>> > >> to
>> > >>     >>>> indicate
>> > >>     >>>> > > that the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > package
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > is
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > part
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> of contrib and experimental
>> (details
>> > >> of API
>> > >>     >>>> TBD
>> > >>     >>>> > > between
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > Marek,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > Kellen
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > and
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Eric). This change would allow
>> to
>> > >> include
>> > >>     >>>> TRT
>> > >>     >>>> > > integration
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > with v1.3
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > to
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> enable users to try TRT with
>> MXNet,
>> > >>     >>>> minimize the
>> > >>     >>>> > > risk and
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > avoid
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > breaking
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> API change.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> To accommodate the change the
>> > >> request is to
>> > >>     >>>> delay
>> > >>     >>>> > > RC for
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > a
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > few
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > days.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Regards,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Steffen
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:08 PM
>> > >> Roshani
>> > >>     >>>> Nagmote <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Hi,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> I have created a wiki for
>> tracking
>> > >> MXNet
>> > >>     >>>> 1.3
>> > >>     >>>> > > release
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > with
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > timeline.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Please take a look here:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     >
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>> > >>     >>>> > Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Status
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> I am still waiting for
>> following 2
>> > >> PRs to
>> > >>     >>>> get
>> > >>     >>>> > > merged:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> TRT integration:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Gluon RNN:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
>> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> *Code freeze date is
>> > >> 08/02(Thursday).*
>> > >>     >>>> Kindly
>> > >>     >>>> > try
>> > >>     >>>> > > to
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > complete
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > ongoing
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> work
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> and get these PRs merged.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Thanks,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Roshani
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:02 PM
>> > >> Roshani
>> > >>     >>>> Nagmote
>> > >>     >>>> > <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Hi all,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Here is an update on MXNet 1.3
>> > >> release:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> I am still waiting for
>> following
>> > >> PRs to
>> > >>     >>>> get
>> > >>     >>>> > > merged:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> TRT integration:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Gluon RNN:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
>> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Scala examples:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11753
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11621
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> *New code freeze date is:
>> 08/03*
>> > >> Please
>> > >>     >>>> try to
>> > >>     >>>> > > get
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > your
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > ongoing
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > PRs
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> merged by then.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> @Pedro, I didn't include your
>> PRs
>> > >> in
>> > >>     >>>> tracking
>> > >>     >>>> > > list as
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > you
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > said
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > those
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> are
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> not critical for now. Please
>> let
>> > >> me know
>> > >>     >>>> if
>> > >>     >>>> > > those needs
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > to
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > be
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> included.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> I also have updated project
>> > >> proposal
>> > >>     >>>> cwiki page
>> > >>     >>>> > > to
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > update
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > status
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> of
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> PRs.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > >
>> > >>     >>>> > >     >
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>> > >>     >>>> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Please let me know if I am
>> missing
>> > >>     >>>> something.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Thanks,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Roshani
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:34
>> PM
>> > >> Pedro
>> > >>     >>>> Larroy <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> I would like to get these PR
>> > >> merged:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> How much longer until the
>> code
>> > >> freeze?
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:44
>> AM
>> > >> Roshani
>> > >>     >>>> > Nagmote
>> > >>     >>>> > > <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Hi all,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> PRs waiting to be merged
>> for 1.3
>> > >>     >>>> release:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Are there any other PRs
>> waiting
>> > >> to get
>> > >>     >>>> > merged?
>> > >>     >>>> > > Please
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > let me
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > know.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Release blocker issue:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     >
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11853
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> @Marco, @Kellen, Thanks for
>> > >> bringing up
>> > >>     >>>> the
>> > >>     >>>> > > important
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > topic. I
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> agree
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> with
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> you and we(internal Amazon
>> team)
>> > >> will be
>> > >>     >>>> > > working on
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > fixing the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> disabled
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> tests.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Currently, my colleague,
>> Hao Jin
>> > >> is
>> > >>     >>>> working
>> > >>     >>>> > on
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > compiling
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > list
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> of
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> disabled tests and leading
>> the
>> > >> effort
>> > >>     >>>> to fix
>> > >>     >>>> > > them in
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > next
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > few
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> days.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Roshani
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at
>> 6:39 PM
>> > >> kellen
>> > >>     >>>> > > sunderland <
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com
>> >
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks again for organizing
>> > >> Roshani.  I
>> > >>     >>>> > > believe the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > TensorRT
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> work
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> is
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> ready
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> for a merge.  Thanks to
>> Marek
>> > >> and all
>> > >>     >>>> the
>> > >>     >>>> > > NVIDIA
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > people
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > for
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> iterating
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> on
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> it.  If possible could a
>> > >> committer
>> > >>     >>>> review,
>> > >>     >>>> > > make sure
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > it
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > meets
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> their
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> expectations and then
>> merge?
>> > >> PR is
>> > >>     >>>> here:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     >
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> To Marco's point.  I'd
>> > >> recommend we
>> > >>     >>>> review
>> > >>     >>>> > > some of
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > those
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> disabled
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> tests
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> and
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> see how likely they are to
>> > >> affect users
>> > >>     >>>> > > before we
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > cut
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > a
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > release.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> Many of
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> them are obviously not too
>> > >> important
>> > >>     >>>> from a
>> > >>     >>>> > > user's
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > point of
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > view
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> (e.g.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> downloading a
>> sometimes-offline
>> > >> image
>> > >>     >>>> in a
>> > >>     >>>> > > test).
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > One
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > idea
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> would
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> be
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> to
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> try
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> and address as many of the
>> > >> customer
>> > >>     >>>> > impacting
>> > >>     >>>> > > issues
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > as
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > possible
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> between
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> code freeze and the RC0
>> vote.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at
>> 1:23 PM
>> > >> Marco
>> > >>     >>>> de
>> > >>     >>>> > Abreu
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> <
>> marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com
>> > >> .invalid>
>> > >>     >>>> > wrote:
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello Roshani,
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> frequent releases are
>> good and
>> > >> I'm
>> > >>     >>>> > > supportive for
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > this
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > in
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> general
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> in
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> order
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> to provide our users with
>> the
>> > >> latest
>> > >>     >>>> > > features and
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> improvements.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> But
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> at
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> moment, I'm slightly
>> concerned
>> > >> about
>> > >>     >>>> the
>> > >>     >>>> > test
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > coverage
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > due to
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> [1]. I
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> want
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> us to be conscious about
>> > >> cutting a
>> > >>     >>>> release
>> > >>     >>>> > > even
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > though
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > not
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > all
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> tests
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> are
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> enabled (29 disabled
>> tests [2]
>> > >> as of
>> > >>     >>>> > today).
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > However, I
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> acknowledge
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> that
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> we
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> have improved by a lot
>> lately
>> > >> thanks
>> > >>     >>>> to
>> > >>     >>>> > > everybody
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> participating
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> and
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> leading
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the efforts around
>> improving
>> > >> flaky
>> > >>     >>>> tests.
>> > >>     >>>> > > From a
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > retrospective
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> point of
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> view, we could say that
>> these
>> > >> efforts
>> > >>     >>>> have
>> > >>     >>>> > > actually
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > revealed
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> some
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> quite
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> interesting bugs and thus
>> the
>> > >> time
>> > >>     >>>> was well
>> > >>     >>>> > > spent
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > and
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > yielded
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> good
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> results.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> What does the community
>> think
>> > >> about
>> > >>     >>>> making
>> > >>     >>>> > > another
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > sprint of
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> improvements
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> around tests followed up
>> by a
>> > >> period
>> > >>     >>>> of 1-2
>> > >>     >>>> > > weeks
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > during
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > which
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> we
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> observe
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the failures closely to
>> ensure
>> > >> that no
>> > >>     >>>> > > critical
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > paths
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > are
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> impacted?
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> If
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> we
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> are in a good shape by
>> then,
>> > >> we could
>> > >>     >>>> > > continue the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > release
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> process
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> and
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> at
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the same time have the
>> > >> advantage of
>> > >>     >>>> giving
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > contributors more
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> lead
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> time
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> to
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> finish their work to
>> ensure it
>> > >> gets
>> > >>     >>>> into
>> > >>     >>>> > the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > release
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > in the
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> desired
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> quality.
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Again, thanks to
>> everybody for
>> > >> their
>> > >>     >>>> > efforts
>> > >>     >>>> > > during
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > the last
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> weeks
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> to
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> improve the usability and
>> > >> stability of
>> > >>     >>>> > > MXNet. This
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > is
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > > great
>> > >>     >>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> community
>> > >>     >>>> > >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message