mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3
Date Mon, 13 Aug 2018 23:08:03 GMT
Hi Dom,

I verified resnet50 run on MXNet master branch. Checked on single gpu
machine. Numbers match. I didn't see any performance degradation.
https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html#scoring-results

Can you please give me more details on the instance type and script you ran
exactly so that I can try to reproduce it again?

Thanks,
Roshani


On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:31 PM Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This is not a major feature. I meant other new feature requests PR won't
> be accepted in 1.3 release now.
> Bug fixes will be accepted. I will be trying to reproduce the regression
> Dom mentioned today. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Roshani
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:06 PM Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is this is a major feature? This is a regression that Dom is reporting wrt
>> to performance
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Roshani Nagmote <
>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for reporting this issue Dom.
>> > 08/10 (Frida)y was the major feature freeze date. We won't be accepting
>> any
>> > new features now for MXNet 1.3 release.
>> > RC0 will be cut on 08/17(Friday).
>> >
>> > Will be verifying the performance degradation issue mentioned.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Roshani
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:45 AM Divakaruni, Dominic
>> > <ddivakar@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all, We tested resnet50 on MXNet built from master branch on Friday
>> > and
>> > > were seeing degraded performance on GPU - about 50% slower compared to
>> > > these values here https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html.
>> FWIW
>> > > this slowdown was seen for both MXNet as well as the TRT integrated
>> > MXNet.
>> > >
>> > > Something for you all to verify before or after you cut the RC.
>> > >
>> > > Thx!
>> > >
>> > > On 8/13/18, 4:34 AM, "kellen sunderland" <
>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >     Hey Roshani,
>> > >
>> > >     Has a RC branch already been cut?  If so, a quick heads up that I
>> > think
>> > >     this commit should probably get into RC0 for 1.3.
>> > >
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>> > ee8755a2531b322fec29c9c3d2aa3b8738da41f3
>> > >
>> > >     It won't cause issues for users, but from a versioning
>> compatibility
>> > >     perspective it's probably better that we remove these functions in
>> > this
>> > >     release. This way we don't have to worry about major bumps in the
>> > next
>> > >     release if they're removed.
>> > >
>> > >     -Kellen
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >     On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:24 PM Roshani Nagmote <
>> > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >     wrote:
>> > >
>> > >     > Thanks Kellen and everyone else for working to get TensorRT PR
>> > > merged!
>> > >     > @Sina, I will be keeping track of that issue and fixes to get in
>> > the
>> > >     > release.
>> > >     >
>> > >     > We are starting code freeze for 1.3 release today. A release
>> > > candidate will
>> > >     > be cut on 08/17.
>> > >     > Feel free to add any other comments/suggestions.
>> > >     >
>> > >     > Thanks,
>> > >     > Roshani
>> > >     >
>> > >     > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:39 AM kellen sunderland <
>> > >     > kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >     >
>> > >     > > All merged and ready to go from my side Roshani (the TensorRT
>> > PR).
>> > >     > >
>> > >     > > I agree with Sina that issue 12116 looks it's a blocker.  I'll
>> > try
>> > > and
>> > >     > > reproduce it locally to get another datapoint.
>> > >     > >
>> > >     > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:15 AM Afrooze, Sina <
>> > sina.beh@gmail.com>
>> > >     > wrote:
>> > >     > >
>> > >     > > > Hi Roshani - I think this regression issue is a release
>> > blocker:
>> > >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116  -
>> Sina
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > > > On 8/8/18, 12:40 PM, "Roshani Nagmote" <
>> > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >     > > wrote:
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     Thanks, Kellen for letting me know.
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM kellen sunderland <
>> > >     > > >     kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > Hey Roshani, I think it should be ready by Friday.
>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >     > > >     > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 10:20 PM Roshani Nagmote <
>> > >     > > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >     > > >     > wrote:
>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >     > > >     > > Thanks Kellen. Yes, we were treating this PR as a
>> > release
>> > >     > > blocker.
>> > >     > > > Do you
>> > >     > > >     > > have any ETA by which it will be completed?
>> Approximate
>> > > time
>> > >     > will
>> > >     > > > also
>> > >     > > >     > > work.
>> > >     > > >     > > @zhi, Thanks for bringing this PR into notice. I
>> will
>> > > keep a
>> > >     > > track
>> > >     > > > of it.
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     > > -Roshani
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:30 AM Joshua Z. Zhang <
>> > >     > > > cheungchih@gmail.com>
>> > >     > > >     > > wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > I strongly suggest to track this PR
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908
>> > <
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908
>> > >
>> > > in 1.3
>> > >     > > > release
>> > >     > > >     > > > which fixed the usability issue for lower end
>> > machines
>> > > that
>> > >     > > > don’t have
>> > >     > > >     > as
>> > >     > > >     > > > large shared memory space as ec2 instances.
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > Best,
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > - Zhi
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > > On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Roshani Nagmote <
>> > >     > > >     > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > > Hi all,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > > Right now, we are delaying MXNet 1.3 release for
>> > > pending
>> > >     > > > TensorRT PR
>> > >     > > >     > (
>> > >     > > >     > > > > https://github.com/apache/
>> > incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>> > > ).
>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > > I wanted to ask everyone for their opinions if
>> we
>> > > should
>> > >     > > delay
>> > >     > > > the
>> > >     > > >     > > > release
>> > >     > > >     > > > > to get tensorRT integration in or we should go
>> > ahead
>> > > with
>> > >     > the
>> > >     > > > release
>> > >     > > >     > > and
>> > >     > > >     > > > > include tensorRT in next release. Please provide
>> > >     > suggestions.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > > Thanks,
>> > >     > > >     > > > > Roshani
>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:45 AM Hagay Lupesko <
>> > >     > > > lupesko@gmail.com>
>> > >     > > >     > > wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Some thoughts: why not keep it out of 1.3, and
>> > > merge it
>> > >     > into
>> > >     > > > master
>> > >     > > >     > so
>> > >     > > >     > > > it
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> can go out with 1.4 instead?
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Pros:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - Reduce quality risks for 1.3
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - More time to test and get feedback before
>> > release
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - Avoid further delays in 1.3 release (lots of
>> > good
>> > > stuff
>> > >     > > > there
>> > >     > > >     > > already
>> > >     > > >     > > > for
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> users)
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Cons:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - People will need to get master to experiment
>> > with
>> > > TRT
>> > >     > (not
>> > >     > > > a major
>> > >     > > >     > > > issue
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> IMO)
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Besides, TRT requires a build flag anyway, so
>> > MXNet
>> > > users
>> > >     > > > consuming
>> > >     > > >     > > > built
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> packages (PyPi, Scala) will anyway not be able
>> to
>> > > try it
>> > >     > out
>> > >     > > > unless
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> building from source...
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Thoughts?
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 10:38 PM Steffen Rochel
>> <
>> > >     > > >     > > steffenrochel@gmail.com
>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Marek, Kellen, Jun, Da, Eric, myself and a few
>> > > other
>> > >     > people
>> > >     > > >     > discussed
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> offline about TensorRT integration PR (
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 ).
>> > >     > We
>> > >     > > > do
>> > >     > > >     > agree
>> > >     > > >     > > > that
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> it
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> would be good to include the PR into upcoming
>> 1.3
>> > >     > release,
>> > >     > > > but are
>> > >     > > >     > > all
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> concerned about the risk involved and the
>> > breaking
>> > > API
>> > >     > > > change. The
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> discussion converged to following proposal.
>> (1)
>> > > change to
>> > >     > > > contrib
>> > >     > > >     > PR
>> > >     > > >     > > > and
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> (2) define a different top level API to
>> indicate
>> > > that the
>> > >     > > > package
>> > >     > > >     > is
>> > >     > > >     > > > part
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> of contrib and experimental (details of API
>> TBD
>> > > between
>> > >     > > > Marek,
>> > >     > > >     > Kellen
>> > >     > > >     > > > and
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Eric). This change would allow to include TRT
>> > > integration
>> > >     > > > with v1.3
>> > >     > > >     > > to
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> enable users to try TRT with MXNet, minimize
>> the
>> > > risk and
>> > >     > > > avoid
>> > >     > > >     > > > breaking
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> API change.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> To accommodate the change the request is to
>> delay
>> > > RC for
>> > >     > a
>> > >     > > > few
>> > >     > > >     > days.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Regards,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Steffen
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:08 PM Roshani
>> Nagmote <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Hi,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> I have created a wiki for tracking MXNet 1.3
>> > > release
>> > >     > with
>> > >     > > > the
>> > >     > > >     > > > timeline.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Please take a look here:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > >
>> > >     >
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>> > Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Status
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> I am still waiting for following 2 PRs to get
>> > > merged:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> TRT integration:
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Gluon RNN:
>> > >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> *Code freeze date is 08/02(Thursday).* Kindly
>> > try
>> > > to
>> > >     > > > complete
>> > >     > > >     > > ongoing
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> work
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> and get these PRs merged.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Thanks,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Roshani
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:02 PM Roshani
>> Nagmote
>> > <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Hi all,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Here is an update on MXNet 1.3 release:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> I am still waiting for following PRs to get
>> > > merged:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> TRT integration:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Gluon RNN:
>> > >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Scala examples:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11753
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11621
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> *New code freeze date is: 08/03*  Please
>> try to
>> > > get
>> > >     > your
>> > >     > > > ongoing
>> > >     > > >     > > PRs
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> merged by then.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> @Pedro, I didn't include your PRs in
>> tracking
>> > > list as
>> > >     > you
>> > >     > > > said
>> > >     > > >     > > those
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> are
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> not critical for now. Please let me know if
>> > > those needs
>> > >     > > to
>> > >     > > > be
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> included.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> I also have updated project proposal cwiki
>> page
>> > > to
>> > >     > update
>> > >     > > > the
>> > >     > > >     > > status
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> of
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> PRs.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > >
>> > >     >
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Please let me know if I am missing
>> something.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Thanks,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Roshani
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:34 PM Pedro
>> Larroy <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> I would like to get these PR merged:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> How much longer until the code freeze?
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:44 AM Roshani
>> > Nagmote
>> > > <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Hi all,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> PRs waiting to be merged for 1.3 release:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Are there any other PRs waiting to get
>> > merged?
>> > > Please
>> > >     > > > let me
>> > >     > > >     > > know.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Release blocker issue:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11853
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> @Marco, @Kellen, Thanks for bringing up
>> the
>> > > important
>> > >     > > > topic. I
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> agree
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> with
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> you and we(internal Amazon team) will be
>> > > working on
>> > >     > > > fixing the
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> disabled
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> tests.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Currently, my colleague, Hao Jin is
>> working
>> > on
>> > >     > > compiling
>> > >     > > > the
>> > >     > > >     > list
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> of
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> disabled tests and leading the effort to
>> fix
>> > > them in
>> > >     > > the
>> > >     > > > next
>> > >     > > >     > few
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> days.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Roshani
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:39 PM kellen
>> > > sunderland <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks again for organizing Roshani.  I
>> > > believe the
>> > >     > > > TensorRT
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> work
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> is
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> ready
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> for a merge.  Thanks to Marek and all the
>> > > NVIDIA
>> > >     > > people
>> > >     > > > for
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> iterating
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> on
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> it.  If possible could a committer
>> review,
>> > > make sure
>> > >     > > it
>> > >     > > > meets
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> their
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> expectations and then merge?  PR is here:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >     > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> To Marco's point.  I'd recommend we
>> review
>> > > some of
>> > >     > > those
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> disabled
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> tests
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> and
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> see how likely they are to affect users
>> > > before we
>> > >     > cut
>> > >     > > a
>> > >     > > >     > release.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> Many of
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> them are obviously not too important
>> from a
>> > > user's
>> > >     > > > point of
>> > >     > > >     > view
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> (e.g.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> downloading a sometimes-offline image in
>> a
>> > > test).
>> > >     > One
>> > >     > > > idea
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> would
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> be
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> to
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> try
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> and address as many of the customer
>> > impacting
>> > > issues
>> > >     > > as
>> > >     > > >     > possible
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> between
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> code freeze and the RC0 vote.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:23 PM Marco de
>> > Abreu
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> <marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com.invalid>
>> > wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello Roshani,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> frequent releases are good and I'm
>> > > supportive for
>> > >     > > this
>> > >     > > > in
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> general
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> in
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> order
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> to provide our users with the latest
>> > > features and
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> improvements.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> But
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> at
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> the
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> moment, I'm slightly concerned about the
>> > test
>> > >     > > coverage
>> > >     > > > due to
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> [1]. I
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> want
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> us to be conscious about cutting a
>> release
>> > > even
>> > >     > > though
>> > >     > > > not
>> > >     > > >     > all
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> tests
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> are
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> enabled (29 disabled tests [2] as of
>> > today).
>> > >     > > However, I
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> acknowledge
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> that
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> we
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> have improved by a lot lately thanks to
>> > > everybody
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> participating
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> and
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> leading
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the efforts around improving flaky
>> tests.
>> > > From a
>> > >     > > >     > retrospective
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> point of
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> view, we could say that these efforts
>> have
>> > > actually
>> > >     > > > revealed
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> some
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> quite
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> interesting bugs and thus the time was
>> well
>> > > spent
>> > >     > and
>> > >     > > > yielded
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> good
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> results.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> What does the community think about
>> making
>> > > another
>> > >     > > > sprint of
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> improvements
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> around tests followed up by a period of
>> 1-2
>> > > weeks
>> > >     > > > during
>> > >     > > >     > which
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> we
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> observe
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the failures closely to ensure that no
>> > > critical
>> > >     > paths
>> > >     > > > are
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> impacted?
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> If
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> we
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> are in a good shape by then, we could
>> > > continue the
>> > >     > > > release
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> process
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> and
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> at
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the same time have the advantage of
>> giving
>> > >     > > > contributors more
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> lead
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> time
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> to
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> finish their work to ensure it gets into
>> > the
>> > >     > release
>> > >     > > > in the
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> desired
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> quality.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Again, thanks to everybody for their
>> > efforts
>> > > during
>> > >     > > > the last
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> weeks
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> to
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> improve the usability and stability of
>> > > MXNet. This
>> > >     > is
>> > >     > > > great
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> community
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> effort and a good example of a community
>> > > working
>> > >     > > > together
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> towards
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> a
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> unified
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> goal!
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Marco
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> [1]:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > >
>> > >     >
>> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d6d81401de796a96677a112d6cd0b0
>> > 74b01f46564194ea89b86c6a3e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> [2]:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > >
>> > >     >
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues?q=is%
>> > 3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Disabled+test%22
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:34 PM Roshani
>> > > Nagmote <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> As mentioned before, code freeze date
>> is
>> > > today
>> > >     > July
>> > >     > > > 23rd.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Please
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> try
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> to
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> get
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> your ongoing PRs merged by today.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any
>> > > concerns or
>> > >     > need
>> > >     > > > more
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> time.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Roshani
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:16 PM Anirudh
>> > > Acharya <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> anirudhkrec@gmail.com
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> @sandeep krishnamurthy <
>> > >     > > sandeep.krishna98@gmail.com>
>> > >     > > > the
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> bug
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> fixes
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> in
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> R-package is something we have just
>> > begun,
>> > > there
>> > >     > > > will not
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> be
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> anything
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> significant to announce before the
>> v1.3
>> > > code
>> > >     > > freeze.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:08 PM
>> Steffen
>> > > Rochel <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> steffenrochel@gmail.com
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To make it easier to find the
>> > discussions
>> > >     > related
>> > >     > > to
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> project
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> proposals
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> I
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> added a column with a link to the
>> thread
>> > > on dev@
>> > >     > > > for
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> most
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> projects.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Appreciate for the project owners to
>> > fill
>> > > in the
>> > >     > > > blanks
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> and
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> to
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> check
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that I
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> got the right threads.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Steffen
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:11 PM
>> Roshani
>> > > Nagmote
>> > >     > <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kellen,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. I will update the notes with
>> the
>> > >     > > information.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roshani
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:01 PM
>> kellen
>> > >     > > sunderland <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Roshani,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to add 'TensorRT
>> > > Runtime
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Integration'
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> to
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> the
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> list
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> upcoming features?  We'll target
>> > > getting the
>> > >     > > > release
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> in
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> and
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> polished
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> by
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 23rd.  Design proposal is here:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > >
>> > >     >
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>> > Runtime+Integration+with+TensorRT
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the lead contributor is Marek
>> > > Kolodziej.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Kellen
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:32 PM
>> > Roshani
>> > >     > Nagmote
>> > >     > > <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting the process to
>> prepare
>> > > for
>> > >     > Apache
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> MXNet
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> (incubating)
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.3
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release. Please find project
>> proposal
>> > > draft
>> > >     > for
>> > >     > > >     > > > >> this
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> release
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> here:
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <*
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > >
>> > >     >
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > >
>> > >     >
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Target feature freeze date is July
>> > > 23rd. A
>> > >     > > > release
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> candidate
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> will
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around Monday, August 6th and
>> voting
>> > > will
>> > >     > > > commence
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> from
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> then
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> until
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, August 9th. If you have
>> any
>> > >     > > additional
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> features
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> in
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> progress
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to include it in this
>> > > release,
>> > >     > > please
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> make
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> sure
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> to
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> comment
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can update the release notes.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to add any other
>> > >     > > comments/suggestions.
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roshani
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >     > >
>> > >     > > >     >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > > >
>> > >     > >
>> > >     >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message